Thanks for posting this video.
Here is the unfortunate sequel:
The Sisters of St. Agnes were so embarrassed by the re-release of the 1958 video by the National Film Preservation Foundation that they created a counter-film to show that they have entirely repudiated everything that they stood for back then.
"This film was created in response to the re-release of Decision for Happiness (https: //youtu.be/N2pDxuipbG0) to show the many changes that are a result of Vatican II."
I wasn't going to show that but I knew that sooner or later somebody would.
I have to ask a question that I'm posing on the Austrian chancellor thread and which is also being debated on the Iran thread.
Were those nuns faking it? It doesn't seem likely you would renounce husband and children in favor of the rigors of the convent if you didn't have some firm belief.
So if they were sincere at that time, what made them change? The collapse of Western Civ and return to tribalism of the 60's? Vat 2? Bishop Happy-Clappy? The changes in the liturgy?
And if those things made them change, how solid was their faith to begin with? How solid is any of our faith if we can so easily be persuaded to abandon it? And why did others never abandon it? Why did some abandon it and then later return to it? The Grace of God? Predestination? Circumstance?
If we are a remnant that has been favored by God to keep the faith, does that mean that God no longer desires Christendom? Are Christians supposed to be a tiny persecuted and ridiculed minority? What is the sense then of building a Catholic society? A society where the majority, damned to Hell, are just going through the motions, all so that we faithful few can live in a better place to raise our kids?
Or is this all just part of a cycle? The faithful few survive tribulations, construct a decent society which produces Godless self-indulgent hedonists, only to collapse again so that the faithful few can rebuild it? What am I missing here?