the Church of One

[Older Salt]

During?  Are you sure you don't mean after?

Actually, not getting ahead of ourselves... would you mind my asking exactly what you mean by "developments in the faith" in the first place?

The gradual acceptance of the Augustinian thesis on the interpretation of Genesis...the acceptance of Heliocentrism (to oversimplify)...the acceptance of figurative language in the Old Testament...these are the ones people usually fight about in settings like this.

Heliocentrism is not an established fact.

[Adeodatus]

Please define conspiracy nut....and dont say voxxpopulisuxx

OK, I won't.

People who think "Not A therefore B" is a valid form of argument.

[Icterus]

Heliocentrism is not an established fact.

Bob Sungenis keeps telling me that. 

[Icterus]

This place doesn't seem much different from Cathinfo.  At least they're honest about their prejudices.  I'm out.  BTW, Kaesekopf, you can't call me down for my tone while you call posters 'asshats'.  That's just [removed] up.  Try to do a better job. 

Edited by kaese for vulgarity.

[Greg]

So where is left now Icterus?

Fisheaters  x
CathInfo    x
SD            x
Catholic Answers  x

Try Belamine Forums or Archbishop Lefebvre's (Vulcan Mind Meld) Forum

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m48xii7ndcg[/yt]

[Icterus]

Done.  With the Trad Catholic.  I hope to say this is the last post ever.  I'm tired of it.  Narrow, frightened minds.  Look at your post in the evolution thread. [Removed] scary.  If Adam wasn't one man, a billion abortions don't matter?  You're not even a good atheistic humanist, much less a follower of Christ.  Peace, out. 

[Kaesekopf]

Good riddance to bad rubbish!

And watch your language.  It's unbecoming of a grown man

[Kaesekopf]

Also, you 'hope to say'?  No one is forcing you to post here.  No one is taking over your body making posts. 

Learn some self control and just get out.

To help you out, take a one day ban per the ban schedule. 

[Recovering NOer]

Welcome, Icterus! I think I'm going to like you. 

So much for that. 

[voxxpopulisuxx]

Please define conspiracy nut....and dont say voxxpopulisuxx

OK, I won't.

Ok so wheres your definition?

[tradne4163]

i call troll. agree?

obvious troll is obvious.

[voxxpopulisuxx]

Please define conspiracy nut....and dont say voxxpopulisuxx

OK, I won't.

People who think "Not A therefore B" is a valid form of argument.

how about if not A therefore A must be discounted and B-C-D......Z can be considered and should be

[Ancilla Domini]

Welcome, Icterus! I think I'm going to like you. 

So much for that. 

I didn't realize my personal preferences were of such interest to anyone here.

[Penelope]

Welp, I think we're done here. OP banned; thread locked.