The Vladimir Putin Interview - Tucker Carlson

[josh987654321]

Thought I'd also add.

1) I would've been keen to hear about what Russia has found in terms of the those USA backed and run Bio-labs in Ukraine. Unfortunately it was not talked about.

2) ABM System -

The third moment, a very important one, is the moment when the US missile defense (ABM) system was created. The beginning. We tried for a long time to persuade the United States not to do it. Moreover, after I was invited by Bush Jr.'s father, Bush Sr. to visit his place on the ocean, I had a very serious conversation with President Bush and his team. I proposed that the United States, Russia and Europe jointly create a missile defense system that, we believe, if created unilaterally, threatens our security,

It's rather ironic, I was watching an old video of Ronald Raegan talking about exactly this, and Vladimir Putin is saying exactly what Ronald Raegan proposed to the Soviet Press, that instead of MAD doctrine (Mutually Assured Destruction) instead they develop and share an Anti-Ballistic Missile system (ABM) so that it's Mutually Assured Defence. The Soviet Press at the time said that if developed unilaterally it would simply be another arms race and return to MAD, in which Raegan said it should be developed jointly for joint security, so very ironic that Vladimir Putin is talking about here exactly what Ronald Raegan envisaged and proposed.



^ Starting at 3:35

And... keeping for our own advantage is exactly what they ended up doing after Reagan, which of course forces others to overcome them which turns into a new arms race which returns to the original status quo MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction).

Reagan even 'assured' them, but obviously Reagan can't live and be President forever. I don't doubt Reagan was sincere, but unfortunately he is long gone now.

There is even more irony in that interview, especially in terms of Afghanistan, when you take into account Iraq and Syria.

God Bless

[King Wenceslas]

This is funny. Putin still doesn't know that he owned Carlson from the get go.

What planet is Putin on. O, that's right, he is so isolated from the real world that he doesn't know jack about Carlson. Putin thought that Carlson would be asking hard questions like a western journalist. He didn't know that Carlson is pro-Russian.

[Baylee]

This is funny. Putin still doesn't know that he owned Carlson from the get go.

What planet is Putin on. O, that's right, he is so isolated from the real world that he doesn't know jack about Carlson. Putin thought that Carlson would be asking hard questions like a western journalist. He didn't know that Carlson is pro-Russian.

Carlson is very anti-war, so I doubt that he's pro-Russian or pro-Ukraine.

[drummerboy]

This is funny. Putin still doesn't know that he owned Carlson from the get go.

What planet is Putin on. O, that's right, he is so isolated from the real world that he doesn't know jack about Carlson. Putin thought that Carlson would be asking hard questions like a western journalist. He didn't know that Carlson is pro-Russian.

 Not quite.  Tucker was really pushing where he shouldn't have at the end when he get urging Putin to release that reporter.  Putin made it clear he was found in espionage, and therefore a matter of state security, but was still quite gracious given Tucker's insistence.  And Tucker was clearly trying to dupe Putin into some admission that he's nothing more than a land grabbing war monger. 

[Greg]

This is funny. Putin still doesn't know that he owned Carlson from the get go.

What planet is Putin on. O, that's right, he is so isolated from the real world that he doesn't know jack about Carlson. Putin thought that Carlson would be asking hard questions like a western journalist. He didn't know that Carlson is pro-Russian.

What's funny is that your addled brain believes that the same people who lied to you about Covid and vaccines and Hunter Biden's laptop are telling you the truth about Ukraine.

[SamVanHouten]

This is funny. Putin still doesn't know that he owned Carlson from the get go.

What planet is Putin on. O, that's right, he is so isolated from the real world that he doesn't know jack about Carlson. Putin thought that Carlson would be asking hard questions like a western journalist. He didn't know that Carlson is pro-Russian.

Glory to the Indivisible and Holy Trinity!

Add to that these two truths as to why Catholics cannot support Russia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Diocese_of_Saint_Joseph_at_Irkutsk

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Catholic_Apostolic_Exarchate_of_Russia

The largest Catholic diocese by area has 150,000 faithful in Russia. Russia is yet to produce a bishop of its own while the Finnish of 15,000 Catholics have had their first bishop since the deformation of Luther.

The Russian Byzantine attempt had yet to materialize when once by the Tsar and again by the Soviets, it was vanquished.

Why do you continue to side with a country who considers Catholics untermenschen? It considers the Orthodox untermenschen filth as well, as their rates of substance abuse-caused hepatic diseases and abortion are unmatched in the world.

[Greg]

I side with them because they are clearly trying to stop their children from being perverted and groomed by sodomites and paedophiles.  The west is trying to normalise paedophilia having already normalised sodomy.

They very clearly, as a solid government policy, want to encourage stable healthy families.  They give large amounts of money away to large families and all sorts of financial benefits.

I side with them because they have the balls to stand up to the globalists who are all satanic freemasons.

All countries have legal abortion.  Russia's abortion rates are dropping.  I think they will ban it in the next few years.

I side with them because they will be converted.

I side with them because God wants them consecrated and the hierarchy have completely let Russia down.

I side with them because when this is all over there WILL be a Russia.  No other country has that guarantee.

[Frank]

+1

[ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez]

I side with them because they will be converted.

Nobody ever promised that this would happen within our lifetimes.

Isn't it wise to hedge until it does?

[TradGranny]

Carlson is pro-Russian.

Opposition to US involvement in foreign war does not equate to being "pro-Russia."

[Greg]

I side with them because they will be converted.

Nobody ever promised that this would happen within our lifetimes.

Isn't it wise to hedge until it does?

How would I hedge without giving some of my support to faggots?

Hedging is for weaklings and the lukewarm.  I look at the information and make the call.

How many Putins come along in several hundred years in Russia.  1 or 2 if you are lucky.

Born on the feast of the Rosary?  That is an on the nose bet for sure.

[ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez]

Hedging is for weaklings and the lukewarm.  I look at the information and make the call.

Your Fatima eisegesis and your hopes regarding Russian abortion law are not "information".  This is just wishful thinking.

[Greg]

But the fact the Russia is the only white civilisation taking a hard stance against homosexual perversion is not wishful thinking.  And prior to them doing this, they were left in relative peace by the west.  It was their support of more conservative moral values and veering away from perversion that really saw the western world (USA) panic about where Putin was taking Russia.

So we have a Catholic prophecy and a confluence of otherwise impossible to predict events.

There are many white former Christian nations.  Why have only Russia taken this hard line stance?

Your view of possible future events is wishful thinking too, since the future is only known to God.

What Catholic prophecy do you know that suggests Ukraine beats Russia and a globalist new world order run out of Davos is converted to be Catholic?  If you know of such a prophecy then tell us.

[Melkite]

Born on the feast of the Rosary?  That is an on the nose bet for sure.

That's really interesting!  I never knew that.

[ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez]

But the fact the Russia is the only white civilisation taking a hard stance against homosexual perversion is not wishful thinking.  And prior to them doing this, they were left in relative peace by the west.  It was their support of more conservative moral values and veering away from perversion that really saw the western world (USA) panic about where Putin was taking Russia.

So we have a Catholic prophecy and a confluence of otherwise impossible to predict events.

There are many white former Christian nations.  Why have only Russia taken this hard line stance?

Your view of possible future events is wishful thinking too, since the future is only known to God.

What Catholic prophecy do you know that suggests Ukraine beats Russia and a globalist new world order run out of Davos is converted to be Catholic?  If you know of such a prophecy then tell us.

Look, I think our views are probably more similar than they are different.

I think Russia ought to win this conflict because they are morally superior to their enemy and because a Russian victory improves the odds of lasting peace in the region.

But posting about it on the internet doesn't do anything.

If I were a true believer, I'd move my family there.  But I am hedging because I am not convinced that this conflict will lead immediately to the triumph of the Immaculate Heart.  I'm not saying it can't.  But I'm not convinced it will.