2nd Assassination Attempt on Trump

[Bernadette]

https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-says-investigating-assassination-attempt-trump-after-florida-shooting-1954183

Just saw the news conference. Suspect is in custody, and Trump is unharmed.

[james03]

No surprise.  Ukraine is falling apart.

On the plus side, this shows they are at least a little worried that stealing this election is going to be difficult.

[KreKre]

I'm not surprised. Trump is doing very well in the polls, and it is clear the establishment is terrified of him.

Pray that they be unsuccessful in their attempts to murder him.

[Acolyte]

All most of us can do is pray for him.

[Michael Wilson]

 

[TradGranny]

All most of us can do is pray for him.

Amen. That is number one.

Second, we can contact De Santis and ask that he instruct the FBI to back off and let the state and local law enforcement do their job. We already saw what happens when the FBI "investigates" aka stonewalls. Like the fox guarding the henhouse.

[TradGranny]

— Local media and observers released photos from the moment when the Second assassin that tried to kill Donald Trump on I-95 road in Martin County, Southeast of Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach.

🇺🇸🔒📸 — Fox News and American media reports that the would-be-Assassin suspect behind the Assassination attempt against Former President Donald J. Trump was identified as Ryan Wesley Routh

➡️ According to information available, he is said to have been Heavily Involved with the Ukrainian International Legion (ILDU), which he had previously assisted in the recruitment for in 2022, when he was Interviewed by Newsweek in Romania.

➡️ Mr.Routh is known for been an Avid supporter of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) of Taiwan, President Zelensky of Ukraine and for being outspokenly Pro-Palestine/Anti-Israel on on his social media
t.me/BellumActaNews/129238

[drummerboy]

I pray for Trump and RFK daily. Both for their safety and that they come home to the Faith.  Both seem well intentioned but need guidance.  This is actually the 4th attempt, two others were thwarted before they had sights on Trump.  He's a major threat for the deep state if they keep trying like this

[Antonius]

I will keep Donald Trump in my prayers, The people that keep making these attempts on Trumps life, are also taking aim at democracy.

[Acolyte]

.

?

[Bonaventure]

All most of us can do is pray for him.

Amen. That is number one.

Second, we can contact De Santis and ask that he instruct the FBI to back off and let the state and local law enforcement do their job. We already saw what happens when the FBI "investigates" aka stonewalls. Like the fox guarding the henhouse.

I don't find local law enforcement any more trustworthy or any less corrupt than Federal law enforcement.

[TradGranny]

All most of us can do is pray for him.

Amen. That is number one.

Second, we can contact De Santis and ask that he instruct the FBI to back off and let the state and local law enforcement do their job. We already saw what happens when the FBI "investigates" aka stonewalls. Like the fox guarding the henhouse.

I don't find local law enforcement any more trustworthy or any less corrupt than Federal law enforcement.

I tend to agree with you on this. However after seeing the local sheriff discuss their quick follow-up on the citizen who obtained a photo of the vehicle and  the license plate number and tracking down the suspect (without any "assistance" from the fox guarding the henhouse), I was impressed.

[Bonaventure]

The local sheriff is merely a politician and figurehead. He sets the tone and policy, but it is still the grunts and infrastructure. No different than when a new president, attorney general, etc. comes in.

If the DOJ or Federal law enforcement decide to expand the scope, and take jurisdiction, then that's that.

I also disagree with the "fox guarding the henhouse" characterization.

It's not as simple as a caricature or boogeyman as one would like to think. Local police and sheriff departments are just as corrupt, DEI ridden, incompetent and beholden to Leftist mayors, state attorneys general, and governors, as the Federal side.

A friend of mine, on a local PD, is actually running for a nearby county sheriff for this exact reason. We have had many conversations on this. He's a Trump hive mind type, makes for interesting conversations.

[drummerboy]

All most of us can do is pray for him.

Amen. That is number one.

Second, we can contact De Santis and ask that he instruct the FBI to back off and let the state and local law enforcement do their job. We already saw what happens when the FBI "investigates" aka stonewalls. Like the fox guarding the henhouse.

I don't find local law enforcement any more trustworthy or any less corrupt than Federal law enforcement.

They're humans too:

https://www.today.com/news/kentucky-sheriff-shot-judge-kevin-mullins-rcna171955

[TradGranny]

The local sheriff is merely a politician and figurehead. .

THE CCCCOUNTY SSSSHERIFF
COUNTY SHERIFF conservator of the peace -- The County Sheriff is a Constitutional Officer;
elected by the People; and, bound by oath as guardian of the Peoples' unalienable rights secured by the
Constitution. The Constitution for the United States of America and
its capstone Bill of Rights is the "Law of the Land"; and, all statutes
and state constitutions repugnant to the Constitution for the United
States of America are null and void. If the Sheriff lacks a full
understanding of the Constitution which is "Common Law", it
would stand to reason that he is vulnerable to violation of his oath in
that he may not recognize and comprehend when judges and
politicians violate the Common Law; thus, making himself
technically guilty of treason.
THE DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITIES OF THE SHERIFF CANNOT BE DIMINISHED by those
in the legislature and courts; nor can it be diminished by any state constitution. When it comes to
enforcing the Law, which is to say enforcing the Constitution for the United States of America, the
Sheriff, being the "Chief Law Enforcement Officer", answers to We the People; no one else, not even
the Governor; like any other elected official, the Sheriff cannot be removed from office by another
elected official. He can only be removed by the People at the ballot box; or, by recall; or, by indictment
by the Grand Jury.
The United States Supreme Court said: "The Sheriff is the 'Chief Executive and Administrative
Officer' of a county, chosen by popular election. His principal duties are in aid of the criminal and
civil courts of record [Common Law Courts] such as serving process, summoning juries, executing
judgments, holding judicial sales and the like. He is also the 'Chief Conservator of the Peace' within
his territorial jurisdiction."
The Sheriff, being the Chief Law Enforcement Officer and the highest Peace Officer of the entire
County in which he was elected, is under the obligation to secure the peace; he answers to the People
alone – unlike the State Police, who are code enforcement officers, serving the state and answering to
the governor; and, unlike city, town or village police, who are also code enforcement officers serving
the corporate municipalities, answering to commissioners or mayors. All these officers have a conflict
of interest because they have no constitutional authority or concerns; they serve the system of codes
and statutes instead of upholding the Constitution and serving the People; whereas, the Sheriff reports
directly to the People, not the corporate municipalities; the duties, responsibilities and authorities of the
County Sheriff, as a Constitutional Officer, are, at a minimum, the same as they were when the State
Constitutions were originally written.
When a Sheriff or a U.S. Marshall consults a BAR judge, a BAR attorney or a bureaucrat to ask
whether the judge, attorney or bureaucrat is acting outside of his authority, the Sheriff is doing
something no different than consulting the fox as to whether the fox is raiding the hen house. If the
Sheriff cannot ascertain whether a judge, or any other government servant, is abusing his powers,
NLA – www.NationalLibertyAlliance.org Page 6 of 36
thereby violating the unalienable rights of the People, without asking that servant whether he is doing
so, how can the Sheriff perform his duty? If a politician, judge or prosecutor violates the Constitution,
it is the duty of the Sheriff and the U.S. Marshall to call the Grand Jury and ask the People for an
Indictment. This is the Sheriff's responsibility. Were the Sheriff to seek "permission" of a prosecutor
or judge for an arrest of a politician, judge or prosecutor whom the Sheriff finds in violation of the
Constitution, the Sheriff would be disempowering his own authority; he would be functioning as a tool
to the very ones violating the Constitution; he would, thereby, be violating his own oath. Obviously
then, no politician can come between the Sheriff and the People. Regardless of what they have been
taught, it is the duty of the Sheriff to seek an indictment, not the prosecutor. Prosecutors call the Grand
Jury when the state has an issue; but, the Peoples' business is the Sheriff's business; and, it is the
Sheriff's duty to protect the People from those who would encroach upon their rights. Likewise, the
courts were designed to exist for the purpose of serving and protecting the People from criminals and
tyrants.
What the Sheriff needs to realize is that all states, cities, towns, and villages in America have been
moving towards corporatism; that is to say they have corporate charters; and, that the police forces,
such as State Police, City Police, Town Police and Village Police work for the corporation, not the
People; they are hired by the corporate municipality to uphold codes, not the Constitution; they are
code enforcement officers, not law enforcement officers; and, it is the duty of the Sheriff to know
when the People within his county are suffering violation of their unalienable rights by code
enforcement officers; and, if he fails that duty, then that County is Lawless and the Sheriff is to blame.
The Sheriff works for and answers to the People alone. His sole duty is to protect the unalienable rights
of the People within his County and within the courts against police brutality, tyrannical judges and
abusive government agencies. Sheriffs rarely perform the duties that they were actually elected to
exercise, because they are, unfortunately, constitutionally ignorant.
The Sheriff is to make sure that "Due Process of Law" is met before any arrest or seizure by police
enforcement within his County; and, before any executions of judgments. Even a U.S. Marshal or other
Federal Agent cannot execute a Warrant of any sort within a county without first notifying the Sheriff;
and, it is the duty of the Sheriff to make sure "Due Process of Law" is met before allowing a Code
Enforcement Officer, a U.S. Marshal or other Federal Agent to proceed

https://constitutionallawenforcement.us/docs/NLA-03-The-Power-and-Authority-of-The-County-Sheriff.pdf