The corrupt liberal media came for me, just like they came for Kyle Rittenhouse, and if he decides to sue I say go for it and hold the media accountable: NICHOLAS SANDMANN
By Nicholas Sandmann For Dailymail.Com
The parallels between me and Kyle Rittenhouse are impossible not to draw.
Kyle was 17-years-old when he became a household name after that terrible tragedy in Kenosha.
I was 16-years-old when I was catapulted into the national conversation by video of an encounter with a Native American activist on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.
Kyle was almost immediately labelled a 'white supremacist' and a 'domestic terrorist'.
To many, my red MAGA hat clearly meant that I was a racist.
Sandmann is pictured facing a Native American activist at the Lincoln Memorial in January 2019
Rittenhouse is seen in Kenosha on the night he killed two men and injured a third in August 2020
(Left) Nicholas Sandmann is pictured facing a Native American activist at the Lincoln Memorial in January 2019. (Right) Kyle Rittenhouse is seen in Kenosha on the night he killed two men and injured a third in August 2020
'From my own experience, the death threats, feeling of no future ahead, and that millions of people hate you, is enough to alter you in many concrete ways and permanently'
'From my own experience, the death threats, feeling of no future ahead, and that millions of people hate you, is enough to alter you in many concrete ways and permanently'
In only hours, a former CNN host tweeted an image of me, writing: 'Honest question. Have you ever seen a more punchable face than this kid's?'.
Kyle wasn't given his day in court by his critics.
And neither was I.
The attacks on Kyle came from the national news media, just as they came for me.
They came quickly, without hesitation, because Kyle was an easy target that they could paint in the way they wanted to.
This is the problem with liberal media outlets in the United States. They want to get the story first, get the most views, make the most money, and advance the agenda from liberal patrons.
These outlets cover themselves when they are wrong with small footnotes at the ends of long articles, clarifying that new information has come out and that they have updated their coverage.
News shouldn't be a scoreboard that constantly changes.
News is about coverage that includes a statement of facts that does not need to be corrected. But, the liberal media doesn't do this.
The liberal media rushes to be the first to report.
So every single label on Kyle as a 'terrorist', 'white supremacist', and 'school shooter' in the streets of Kenosha, will only ever be withdrawn after the damage has been done.
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.
So to President Joe Biden, Lebron James, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, and every other commentator: please be quiet.
On November 10th, Lebron James tweeted out 'What tears????? I didn't see one. Man knock it off! That boy ate some lemon heads before walking into court'.
Lebron's tweet reflects the insensitivity and resentment of the liberal media and elites that has surrounded this entire ordeal, from its beginning to now.
In the video referenced by James, Kyle breaks down as he tries to describe the moments before he made the decision to fire his weapon at the people he felt were threatening his life.
It is oblivious to the trauma associated with this event and how it severely affects Kyle.
Taking a life, for any reason, sticks with someone forever and yet the liberal elites would rather turn it into a joke for likes.
Rittenhouse broke down on the stand as he testified about the moments before he shot and killed one of two people in Kenosha on the night of August 25, 2020
+4
Rittenhouse broke down on the stand as he testified about the moments before he shot and killed one of two people in Kenosha on the night of August 25, 2020
Not only does Kyle have to deal with that, but it is compounded with the overwhelming stress and trauma of the character assassination taking place against him.
From my own experience, the death threats, feeling of no future ahead, and that millions of people hate you, is enough to alter you in many concrete ways and permanently.
Make no mistake: even the strongest of people cannot resist the mental impact when the media war machine targets you.
With Kyle's name dragged through the mud, and the clear effect it is having on him, many have started to ask the question whether Kyle should sue for defamation.
While I am by no means an attorney, I have gained some experience on the ins and outs of defamation and can offer an educated guess on what the outcome would be if Kyle were to sue.
It is important to note that defamation cases are some of the hardest cases to win.
The plaintiff must first prove that what was published about them was false. This is usually defeated by the protection of the First Amendment as defendants claim that they were expressing their opinion.
The First Amendment is a right that Americans hold dear and our right to free speech should be protected.
A plaintiff must then prove that as a result of the publishings of the defendant that they were negatively impacted in their community.
As for the previous terms Kyle has been labelled (white supremacist, terrorist, school shooter), I have my doubts as to whether these legal claims would be successful in court.
If 'Person A' was to say that Kyle was a white supremacist (or any of these other terms), 'A' would be able to claim that being a white supremacist or a racist was their opinion and Rittenhouse's conduct.
The case law on defamation argues that these terms are opinions because a term like 'racist' or 'white supremacist' does not specifically imply a fact that can be proven false.
But one claim where Kyle may have a chance (albeit still a challenging case to win) is on the issue of him allegedly crossing state lines with a weapon.
That claim was proven to be false.
If terms like 'racist' and 'school shooter' were used in conjunction with false facts it can create a defamatory gist that he crossed state lines with weapons and his actions were done in a racist or white supremacist manner.
Should Kyle sue? It first depends on what happens in the trial, as those elements would come into play were he found guilty. However, if Kyle is innocent it would create an easier road to winning.
Again, the chances are still low and nothing is guaranteed in a defamation trial. Kyle should also be prepared for a long trial which will be present in his mind for years.
I personally am still involved in six media lawsuits as January approaches marking three years since the confrontation took place at the March for Life.
'One of the saddening parts of this media onslaught is that it has taken young people like Kyle and myself to expose how corrupt the media really is'
'One of the saddening parts of this media onslaught is that it has taken young people like Kyle and myself to expose how corrupt the media really is'
So, if Kyle is prepared to take on another burden in his early life, with the acceptance that it might result in nothing, I answer, give it a shot and hold the media accountable.
One of the saddening parts of this media onslaught is that it has taken young people like Kyle and myself to expose how corrupt the media really is.
From my own experience, I know that this cannot be easy for Kyle. While I have waited to comment on the facts of Kyle's case until the trial ends. I cannot hold back on the media's public execution of him before the trial has concluded.
At this time I would like to use my platform to let Kyle know that I am here for you and if you ever would like to reach out to me, I am about the only person our age to have an idea of how the media is treating you. The way the media has treated you is terrible, and you don't have to face it alone.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10208119/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-NICHOLAS-SANDMANN-media-defamation.html
He can sue, and probably will win. The problem are the damages. It was the prosecution that caused his legal bills.
He can probably get pain-and-suffering and other immaterial damages, but I don't think he can retire off of that.
Should a 19 year old offer legal advice? No.
Quote from: TradGranny on November 20, 2021, 05:27:29 PM
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.
He's 100% correct, which is why Kyle's mother should have kept him home that night.
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
By the way, is there any reason we have at least 7 threads on Kyle Rittenhouse. I have no idea which ones I have participated in at this point.
Can someone merge these? Why do people keep creating new ones?
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:28:04 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
His family couldn't afford the defense he got either. I believe some 2 million was raised by conservative groups.
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:46:15 PM
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:28:04 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
His family couldn't afford the defense he got either. I believe some 2 million was raised by conservative groups.
$500K for defense was raised by e-begging. $1.5 million was of his bail was funded by conservative groups and the remaining $500K was raised by his mother out of her money and that of her family and friends.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:48:14 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:46:15 PM
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:28:04 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
His family couldn't afford the defense he got either. I believe some 2 million was raised by conservative groups.
$500K for defense was raised by e-begging. $1.5 million was of his bail was funded by conservative groups and the remaining $500K was raised by his mother out of her money and that of her family and friends.
I agree with Goggy. He's had one close shave with the law. He should thank his lucky stars he got away with it. He's no Maxwell or Adolph. He's just a sad well meaning teenager who hasn't a clue of what the world out there is like.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 07:28:30 PM
Should a 19 year old offer legal advice? No.
Quote from: TradGranny on November 20, 2021, 05:27:29 PM
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
'In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.'
In our hyperpolarized society, the first impression of Kyle has been set in stone, probably for the rest of his life.
He's 100% correct, which is why Kyle's mother should have kept him home that night.
Again, Kyle drove himself to his job and then paid a visit to a family member, and the rest is history.
Quote from: Prayerful on November 21, 2021, 07:33:49 AM
Again, Kyle drove himself to his job and then paid a visit to a family member, and the rest is history.
As I understand it, Kyle was visiting a close friend to whom he sometimes referred as a brother, rather than a literal family member. But Kyle did have actual family living in Kenosha. There is little basis for claims that he had no business being there.
There is also NO basis for a major news network, CBS, announcing at the top of the hour just yesterday (Alison Keyes, announcer) that Rittenhouse "killed a black man." I heard this with my own ears while driving. This is not shading the truth; this is an outright lie, published around the globe, and should be included in defamation suits.
Quote from: Frank on November 21, 2021, 04:37:30 AM
He's had one close shave with the law. He should thank his lucky stars he got away with it. He's no Maxwell or Adolph. He's just a sad well meaning teenager who hasn't a clue of what the world out there is like.
I am certain that he's been educated by his treatment from the government and news media. Rittenhouse's lawyer said during the post-verdict press conference that Kyle wishes the incident hadn't happened and will move out of the area for his safety.
Who's Maxwell or Adolph?
Quote from: Miriam_M on November 21, 2021, 10:25:39 AM
There is also NO basis for a major news network, CBS, announcing at the top of the hour just yesterday (Alison Keyes, announcer) that Rittenhouse "killed a black man." I heard this with my own ears while driving. This is not shading the truth; this is an outright lie, published around the globe, and should be included in defamation suits.
Are you sure you heard that correctly? She was probably talking about how Kyle was at BLM protests that were being held because a Kenosha police officer killed a black man (Jacob Blake).
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:28:04 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
Wrong. Nick Sandman's lawyer Lin Wood worked pro bono. And he has offered to do the same for Kyle Rittenhouse.
Sandmann Lawyer L. Lin Wood Offers to Represent 17-Year-Old Kenosha Shooter Pro Bono
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/08/29/sandmann-lawyer-l-lin-wood-offers-to-represent-17-year-old-kenosha-shooter-pro-bono/
Quote from: mikemac on November 21, 2021, 04:27:13 PM
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 10:28:04 PM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on November 20, 2021, 10:19:17 PM
Of course he should sue. Just like that young Catholic man who smiled and did not retract from that Injun banging a drum in Washington D.C. during a Pro Life rally a couple of years ago.
Really, "just like"? Apples and oranges because Sandmann wasn't put on trial. By the way, Sandmann came from a well to do family who could afford to sue. Rittenhouse does not. He needs to save his pennies for a GED.
Wrong. Nick Sandman's lawyer Lin Wood worked pro bono. And he has offered to do the same for Kyle Rittenhouse.
Sandmann Lawyer L. Lin Wood Offers to Represent 17-Year-Old Kenosha Shooter Pro Bono
https://tennesseestar.com/2020/08/29/sandmann-lawyer-l-lin-wood-offers-to-represent-17-year-old-kenosha-shooter-pro-bono/
Wrong.
Your article is about representing Kyle in the criminal trial and doesn't have anything to do with defamation. Here's a more recent news article on Sandmann and Wood:
https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2021/01/26/nick-sandmann-fired-attorney-lin-wood-after-twitter-telegram-posts/4260538001/
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 21, 2021, 03:10:42 PM
Are you sure you heard that correctly? She was probably talking about how Kyle was at BLM protests that were being held because a Kenosha police officer killed a black man (Jacob Blake).
This what it says on the CBS "Weekend Roundup" site: http://feeds.cbsnews.com/podcast_weekend_1 (http://feeds.cbsnews.com/podcast_weekend_1)
QuoteA Wisconsin jury acquits Kyle Rittenhouse of all charges for the shooting deaths of two men and the wounding of another during a night of violent protests over the police wounding of a Black man. .. Host Allison Keyes will have these stories and more on the CBS News "Weekend Roundup."
I would imagine a person who is focussing on driving is especially vulnerable to mishearing or misunderstanding items.
Quote from: Jayne on November 21, 2021, 04:33:07 PM
I would imagine a person who is focussing on driving is especially vulnerable to mishearing or misunderstanding items.
You took the words right out of my mouth. I didn't want to say it.
It's crazy how the human mind can hear some words but "remember" other words. "Police wounding of a black man" becomes Rittenhouse "killed a black man".
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 21, 2021, 03:10:42 PM
Quote from: Miriam_M on November 21, 2021, 10:25:39 AM
There is also NO basis for a major news network, CBS, announcing at the top of the hour just yesterday (Alison Keyes, announcer) that Rittenhouse "killed a black man." I heard this with my own ears while driving. This is not shading the truth; this is an outright lie, published around the globe, and should be included in defamation suits.
Are you sure you heard that correctly? She was probably talking about how Kyle was at BLM protests that were being held because a Kenosha police officer killed a black man (Jacob Blake).
Wrong again. You are just guessing now, aren't you. A Kenosha police officer did not killed a black man by the name of Jacob Blake. Jacob Blake is not dead. I have no doubt that Miriam heard exactly what she is saying that she heard.
Quote from: mikemac on November 21, 2021, 04:49:26 PM
I have no doubt that Miriam heard exactly what she is saying that she heard.
Really?
Quote from: Miriam_M on November 21, 2021, 10:25:39 AM
There is also NO basis for a major news network, CBS, announcing at the top of the hour just yesterday (Alison Keyes, announcer) that Rittenhouse "killed a black man." I heard this with my own ears while driving. This is not shading the truth; this is an outright lie, published around the globe, and should be included in defamation suits.
Quote from: Jayne on November 21, 2021, 04:33:07 PM
This what it says on the CBS "Weekend Roundup" site: http://feeds.cbsnews.com/podcast_weekend_1 (http://feeds.cbsnews.com/podcast_weekend_1)
QuoteA Wisconsin jury acquits Kyle Rittenhouse of all charges for the shooting deaths of two men and the wounding of another during a night of violent protests over the police wounding of a Black man. .. Host Allison Keyes will have these stories and more on the CBS News "Weekend Roundup."
I think Kyle has a pile of choices to choose from to sue for slander. Here's a couple that I happened to see yesterday.
'Chilling' Rittenhouse Verdict 'Emboldens' Vigilantes, Warns Wisconsin Newspaper
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/chilling-rittenhouse-verdict-emboldens-vigilantes-010325271.html
First of all the title implies that Kyle was a vigilante. Then there is a photo of Kyle and someone else with this caption under it; "Kyle Rittenhouse at a Kenosha protest before he fatally shot two unarmed men. (Photo: Adam Rogan/The Journal Times via Associated Press)." Note "two unarmed men"; they don't seem to mind lying at all. At the bottom of this Yahoo News article it says;
"Read the entire Wisconsin State Journal editorial .
Also on HuffPost
This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated."
Kyle Rittenhouse trial was designed to protect white conservatives who kill
The shooter's homicide acquittal coddles conservatives and may lead to even more violence.
https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/kyle-rittenhouse-acquitted-homicide-rcna5748
MSNBC is clearly trying to divide here; "protect white conservatives who kill".
At 4:08 minutes on this video it is showing a Independent news article titled "Kyle Rittenhouse cleared of murder after shooting dead two Black Lives Matter protesters". If you keep watching for a second it scrolls down to show a sub-title that reads "Full story: Teenager who shot three black men with rifle found not guilty on all charges."
"shot three black men". The liars.
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSxWzcGi8io[/yt]
I still have no doubt that Miriam heard exactly what she thought she heard.
You all are nuts if you think that calling Kyle a "vigilante" is defamatory. He admitted on the witness stand that he saw that there was lawlessness and disorder in Kenosha and he wanted to do something about it. The fact that he did strapped a gun onto himself and started protecting property, even though he wasn't supposed to be outside due to a riot curfew, makes him a vigilante.
90% of Kyle supporters praise him for cleaning the streets of degenerates like Rosenbaum and Huber, saying that those two finally met justice. Well, it wasn't through a court of law; it was through Kyle. If that's not vigilante justice, I don't know what is.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 07:28:30 PM
Should a 19 year old offer legal advice? No.
Those who actually read the article know that Nicholas offered NO legal advice. He simply offered moral support.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 20, 2021, 07:28:30 PM
y Kyle's mother should have kept him home that night.
Kyle's mother had just completed a double shift and was SLEEPING when her son left. Stop throwing stones.
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 22, 2021, 02:11:28 PM
90% of Kyle supporters praise him for cleaning the streets of degenerates like Rosenbaum and Huber, saying that those two finally met justice.
Wrong. Actually 99% of supporters of Natural Law, the U.S. Constitution, the 2nd Amendment which all protect the right of self-defense AND who watched the trial recognize that prosecutors had NO CASE and were either part of the mob mentality or were appeasing the mob. THAT is why we support Rittenhouse's right to defend himself. The other 1% are, well something I cannot say because I am a Catholic woman.
If you actually believe your words above, you are projecting your own warped thinking onto others.
Quote from: TradGranny on November 22, 2021, 04:24:54 PM
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 22, 2021, 02:11:28 PM
90% of Kyle supporters praise him for cleaning the streets of degenerates like Rosenbaum and Huber, saying that those two finally met justice.
Wrong. Actually 99% of supporters of Natural Law, the U.S. Constitution, the 2nd Amendment which all protect the right of self-defense AND who watched the trial recognize that prosecutors had NO CASE and were either part of the mob mentality or were appeasing the mob. THAT is why we support Rittenhouse's right to defend himself. The other 1% are, well something I cannot say because I am a Catholic woman.
If you actually believe your words above, you are projecting your own warped thinking onto others.
His supporters also support that, including me. But I am saying that 90% of "90% of Kyle supporters praise him for cleaning the streets of degenerates". I'm in the 10% that are not praising him for that.
Don't know who these people are but...
https://news.0censor.com/the-lawsuits-begin-rittenhouses-file-60m-defamation-suit-against-joy-behar-and-whoopi-goldberg/?fbclid=IwAR2IYS_mUnmNTIjTeSJfz-DNtMCdXabTenRsM0fbkFUgv5Cn-15ADToJK3k
Quote from: red solo cup on November 28, 2021, 02:16:53 PM
Don't know who these people are but...
https://news.0censor.com/the-lawsuits-begin-rittenhouses-file-60m-defamation-suit-against-joy-behar-and-whoopi-goldberg/?fbclid=IwAR2IYS_mUnmNTIjTeSJfz-DNtMCdXabTenRsM0fbkFUgv5Cn-15ADToJK3k
Cool. Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg. It couldn't happen to a more deserved pair of liars.
Quote from: red solo cup on November 28, 2021, 02:16:53 PM
Don't know who these people are but...
https://news.0censor.com/the-lawsuits-begin-rittenhouses-file-60m-defamation-suit-against-joy-behar-and-whoopi-goldberg/?fbclid=IwAR2IYS_mUnmNTIjTeSJfz-DNtMCdXabTenRsM0fbkFUgv5Cn-15ADToJK3k
What's the source for this information? It looks like a Russian fake news web site.
https://www.bbb.org/us/wi/green-bay/profile/social-media-marketing/0censor-0694-1000035173
Quote from: GiftOfGod on November 28, 2021, 06:58:34 PM
What's the source for this information? It looks like a Russian fake news web site.
I have to partially agree with Gog.
Fake news yes; story does not check out.
But Russian? Not so, only to those who wear Russia-hoax-goggles.
Smells more like controlled opposition -- like Q.
Quote from: red solo cup on November 28, 2021, 02:16:53 PM
Don't know who these people are but...
https://news.0censor.com/the-lawsuits-begin-rittenhouses-file-60m-defamation-suit-against-joy-behar-and-whoopi-goldberg/?fbclid=IwAR2IYS_mUnmNTIjTeSJfz-DNtMCdXabTenRsM0fbkFUgv5Cn-15ADToJK3k
Snopes debunked it: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/rittenhouses-file-defamation-suit-behar-goldberg/
It originated on a "satire" web site.
Well it's such good news maybe we can talk him into it. :)