Whos banned from Fisheaters?

[Kaesekopf]

I read the user agreement when I registered to this forum.  So I was hesitant about posting any of this.  But after reading this whole thread I decided to.  I hope it doesn't get me banned from this forum too, but if it does so be it.  You might note that I didn't name names, other than twiddler who should be disgraced anyway.  It would be interesting to know what is beside my name over at the other forum for the reason why I was banned.

Haven't seen you post any bannable stuff yet.

Plus, we try to stick as close to possible our rules.  And we're a bit forgiving.  Which doesn't mean take advantage of us!   

[mikemac]

Okay, thanks Kaesekopf.  Yeah I'll try to stick as close to the rules as possible.

[Innocent Smith]

Something was said in that long "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread in the other forum that explains some of the irregularities of the owner.  You know that thread that should have turned into a thread to inform good young men that are discerning the priesthood what seminaries they could go to where they wouldn't be harassed by homosexuals.  But instead right from the first reply it got turned into a thread for a few guys with same sex attraction to "come out" and be loud and proud just like the gay pride movement.  And those that "came out" were coddled, encouraged and put up on a pedestal by the owner and a "former" gay rights activist (she knows who she is cause she has posted in this very thread).  Well in that same long "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread, where just about everyone was disagreeing with the owner and the "former" gay rights activist the owner "came out" herself to say that she has a bipolar disorder.  I feel sorry for her.  But that clearly is not a traditional Catholic forum anymore.  In fact after that thread and a couple of others I don't think that forum should even be using the name Catholic in it's title.

That "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread was clearly wrong.  If the "former" gay rights activist, who I'm sure will be reading this still does not agree that thread was wrong then we need to start another thread about it in this forum.  I had more members PMing me agreeing with what I said in that thread than any other thread in the few years that I was a member of that forum.  So I joined this forum, prepared a long letter to the owner (that I still have) that I was going to post in the "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread then I was going to say good by to that forum.  But I decided against it.

Within a week the same member that twisted how that long "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread ran to his own benefit, Impytwiddler (or what ever his handle was) posted a homosexual innuendo in another thread.  So I called him out on it.  He replied by slandering the Blessed Virgin Mary's title the Queen of Canada, which I had in my avatar, the same one that I'm using here.  By this time I am fed up to the ears.  Someone had already mentioned in this thread that the owner likes to start provocative threads, and it was a provocative thread even before twiddler's remark.  So I replied to twiddler saying that first he comes out loud and proud, then he posts a homosexual innuendo and then he slanders the Mother of God's title, the Queen of Canada.  Because it was a provocative thread I also quoted what the owner had said in the "Catholics and Homosexuals" thread about a forum would die without controversy.  Makes you wonder whether she is just running the forum for money.  I finished off my post to twiddler by asking the owner if she had raised the lavender flag over her forum and if she has I didn't care if she banned me.

The last post in that thread that night was by twiddler calling per_passionem_eius a fag hag right in the forum when she had also tried to defend Our Lady's honor after twiddler slandered Mary's title the Queen of Canada.  I woke up the next morning with an e-mail PM from twiddler telling me to f*** off.  And I was banned from using the forum.

So to be honest I hope she runs out of money to keep that forum going.  Obviously she is not in the right mental state to be operating that forum anyway.  It's not a traditional Catholic forum anymore.  And she shouldn't even be using Catholic in the name of the forum with what's been going on there lately.

I read the user agreement when I registered to this forum.  So I was hesitant about posting any of this.  But after reading this whole thread I decided to.  I hope it doesn't get me banned from this forum too, but if it does so be it.  You might note that I didn't name names, other than twiddler who should be disgraced anyway.  It would be interesting to know what is beside my name over at the other forum for the reason why I was banned.

All in favor of an anti-mini-modding amendment to the Forum Rules, please let me know by replying "Ay!" to this post.  Thanks.

I'm a little late but ... "Ay!".

I take it that RealJayneK is JayneK over at that other forum.

Yeah, double "Ay!".

What can I say, Mike. The sods will be the end of us.

Didn't Rome really fall when it came out loud and proud.

It's worse in our own current time and place.

[mikemac]

What can I say, Mike. The sods will be the end of us.

Didn't Rome really fall when it came out loud and proud.

It's worse in our own current time and place.

Yeah Innocent Smith, I certainly hope that Pope Francis takes swift action against the homosexual infiltration of the Church.  Yes the sods will be the end of us and put the Church back into the catacombs if it's not corrected.  I can't go back to that other forum to check, so correct me if I'm wrong to think that they were reliable sources that were saying that there is a homosexual cabal in the Church.  Was it just the media that was reporting that the 300 page Vatileaks investigation papers reported a homosexual cabal even in the cardinals, or did that come from a reliable source?  If it was from a reliable source then if Pope Francis does not make this a priority very soon then we'll know that we are in trouble.

[Innocent Smith]

What can I say, Mike. The sods will be the end of us.

Didn't Rome really fall when it came out loud and proud.

It's worse in our own current time and place.

Yeah Innocent Smith, I certainly hope that Pope Francis takes swift action against the homosexual infiltration of the Church.  Yes the sods will be the end of us and put the Church back into the catacombs if it's not corrected.  I can't go back to that other forum to check, so correct me if I'm wrong to think that they were reliable sources that were saying that there is a homosexual cabal in the Church.  Was it just the media that was reporting that the 300 page Vatileaks investigation papers reported a homosexual cabal even in the cardinals, or did that come from a reliable source?  If it was from a reliable source then if Pope Francis does not make this a priority very soon then we'll know that we are in trouble.

Not just the end of the Church, Mike. The end of civilization.

Wankers and bankers are in the ninth circle of Hell.

As far as the other forum. Just delete your cache or cookies and you should be able to go back as a reader.

Right now it identifies you as trying to log on. Since you are banned, no can do.

[KumbayaDominumMeum]

Given Papa Francesco's history of support for homosexual civil unions as an alternative to homosexual "marriage" when he was a cardinal, and the enthusiastic support he's getting from extreme liberals like Cdl. Mahony, somehow I don't think it's very likely that his new broom is going to sweep away much besides Tradition, unless it's "Tradition" that's been illumined by Vatican II to the point that it's been stood on its head.

As Bishop Williamson has pointed out more than once, things today are worse than they were in Noah's time... and look at what happened then. And look at what happened to Sodom and Gomorrah. And as Bishop Williamson has also pointed out more than once, World War II was a chastisement for the sins of mankind during the 1920s and '30s, but the sins of today are many times worse.

And then there's Akita, plus what we know of Fatima.

There are storm clouds on the horizon. I think we had better look to the state of our souls as though we were on our deathbeds.

[LouisIX]

There's no merit in discussing different persons and what we do or don't think of them here.  What we know is that FE has become (or maybe already was) a breeding ground of trad-lite neocathism.  That is enough.

Well said, Mith.

I think everyone here is aware of the situation there.  There's no need to get personal or spend an inordinate amount of time on it.  Most of us don't even post there anymore because of SD so the bitterness does us no good (and trust me, I still feel bitter about it too).

[mikemac]

As far as the other forum. Just delete your cache or cookies and you should be able to go back as a reader.

Right now it identifies you as trying to log on. Since you are banned, no can do.

Yeah that worked.  Thanks.

[voxxpopulisuxx]

They just Banned Peter the Rock.....it was for calling 911 truthers nutjobs all the time. I agreed with this one...but why now..... Anyway I have yet to be banned....I have not changed anything about my topics or style....(and I reported IMPY for the faghag comment in the thread Mike mac was mentioning)...and I havent given a nickle....Im not sure what the big deal is if I still post there....its not a part of the holy office..its just an odd duck forum that has Trad forum topics (even if those topics get twisted to the left). SD is the real deal and interesting ...FE is....hmmm....just interesting..to me.

[Archer]

They just Banned Peter the Rock.....it was for calling 911 truthers nutjobs all the time. I agreed with this one...but why now..... Anyway I have yet to be banned....I have not changed anything about my topics or style....(and I reported IMPY for the faghag comment in the thread Mike mac was mentioning)...and I havent given a nickle....Im not sure what the big deal is if I still post there....its not a part of the holy office..its just an odd duck forum that has Trad forum topics (even if those topics get twisted to the left). SD is the real deal and interesting ...FE is....hmmm....just interesting..to me.

He got banned for that? After all those years of outbursts and tantrums?

There really is no rhyme or reason to the moderating over there. 

[voxxpopulisuxx]

They just Banned Peter the Rock.....it was for calling 911 truthers nutjobs all the time. I agreed with this one...but why now..... Anyway I have yet to be banned....I have not changed anything about my topics or style....(and I reported IMPY for the faghag comment in the thread Mike mac was mentioning)...and I havent given a nickle....Im not sure what the big deal is if I still post there....its not a part of the holy office..its just an odd duck forum that has Trad forum topics (even if those topics get twisted to the left). SD is the real deal and interesting ...FE is....hmmm....just interesting..to me.

He got banned for that? After all those years of outbursts and tantrums?

There really is no rhyme or reason to the moderating over there.

Peter Just joined here...I invited him...but warned him to be good. I never really disliked him....he just annoyed the crap out of me.

[Petertherock]

Yup, I am here. I joined the ranks of the banned from FE crowd. Thanks for the invite Joe. I will try to be good.

I was banned for calling people "nut jobs" which is a joke because people have said a lot worse to me and nothing's happened to them. This time, Vox took it personally when I called a group of people nut jobs. Some people know what group of people I am talking about, but I am trying to be good here so I won't mention what group I called a nut job. But I think Vox needs to get thicker skin on some things and clamp down on the real problems over there which are the trad bashers which she seems to support and defend.

[Bonaventure]

[tmw89]

PTR, great to see you over here!  Hope you like and enjoy your time on SD.

[FaithByProxy]

PTR, great to see you over here!  Hope you like and enjoy your time on SD.

Agreed, welcome! 

Things are much more chill over here, I've found. I think you'll be fine.