Author Topic: Whos banned from Fisheaters?  (Read 118339 times)

Offline trentcath

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2403
  • Thanked: 726 times
Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« on: February 08, 2013, 06:35:39 PM »
Just wondering who here got banned on there and who actually got banned? Just curious  :)
 

Offline tmw89

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2783
  • Thanked: 19 times
  • Religion: Roman Catholic
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2013, 06:40:50 PM »
I was banned, and I didn't even get a reason listed under my name by Vox "Gonna Cater to the Left for the Money" Clamantis!

The nerve.
Quote from: Bishop Williamson
The "promise to respect" as Church law the New Code of Canon Law is to respect a number of supposed laws directly contrary to Church doctrine.

---

http://tradblogs.blogspot.com

NOW OPEN:  A new Trad forum featuring Catholic books, information, and discussion!
 

Offline Gottmitunsalex

  • "As the head of the Church, I cannot answer you otherwise: The Jews have not recognized Our Lord; therefore we cannot recognize the Jewish people." ---Pope St. Pius X
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2143
  • Thanked: 24 times
  • Magister Generalis - Hochmeister
    • My position.
  • Religion: römisch-katholisch
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2013, 06:44:40 PM »
Got banned twice on FE.
Once for posting a very short, Sean Connery interview.
The other was without explanation. For a week in December. Out of the blue.
Once the ban was lifted. I waited for a miracle, then on December 26 I heard about the new SD forum. "Never again" I said. So I drafted a farewell letter, which has been taken down, stricken from the FE record. Again, I left in good standing. Oh, BTW, I am a monogamous forum member.

 
"Nothing is more miserable than those people who never failed to attack their own salvation. When there was need to observe the Law, they trampled it under foot. Now that the Law has ceased to bind, they obstinately strive to observe it. What could be more pitiable that those who provoke God not only by transgressing the Law but also by keeping it? But at any rate the Jews say that they, too, adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew adores God! Who say so? The Son of God say so. For he said: "If you were to know my Father, you would also know me. But you neither know me nor do you know my Father". Could I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?"  St. John Chrysostom  Sunday Homily

"The two goals of the Jews: The universal domination of the world and the destruction of Catholicism, out of hatred for Christ" --Mgr. Jouin
 

Offline Ben

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 876
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • At my best, I love you!
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2013, 10:43:44 PM »
I troll there occasionally, so I've been banned more than a few times since 2008.

But I expect to be banned, so it's not very traumatic.
 
The following users thanked this post: bedtimeprayers

Offline trentcath

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2403
  • Thanked: 726 times
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #4 on: February 09, 2013, 07:11:17 AM »
I troll there occasionally, so I've been banned more than a few times since 2008.

But I expect to be banned, so it's not very traumatic.

Troll fisheaters? Its only gotten bad recently
 

Offline Archer

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 5580
  • Thanked: 434 times
  • Slow is smooth, smooth is fast, fast is lethal.
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2013, 09:34:56 AM »
I troll there occasionally, so I've been banned more than a few times since 2008.

But I expect to be banned, so it's not very traumatic.

What username did you use?
"All the good works in the world are not equal to the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass because they are the works of men; but the Mass is the work of God. Martyrdom is nothing in comparison for it is but the sacrifice of man to God; but the Mass is the sacrifice of God for man." - St. John Vianney
 

Offline Ben

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 876
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • At my best, I love you!
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2013, 03:47:22 PM »
I troll there occasionally, so I've been banned more than a few times since 2008.

But I expect to be banned, so it's not very traumatic.

Troll fisheaters? Its only gotten bad recently

It's been bad from the beginning. Vox only ever tolerated true traditional Catholics. The members least likely to be banned have always been the DrBombays, WhollyRomanCatholics, and StrictCatholicGirls.
 

Offline trentcath

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2403
  • Thanked: 726 times
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2013, 03:50:11 PM »
I troll there occasionally, so I've been banned more than a few times since 2008.

But I expect to be banned, so it's not very traumatic.

Troll fisheaters? Its only gotten bad recently

It's been bad from the beginning. Vox only ever tolerated true traditional Catholics. The members least likely to be banned have always been the DrBombays, WhollyRomanCatholics, and StrictCatholicGirls.

I disagree. what was your username btw?
 

Offline Ben

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 876
  • Thanked: 2 times
  • At my best, I love you!
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2013, 03:51:10 PM »
Not telling.  :tongue:
 

Offline trentcath

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2403
  • Thanked: 726 times
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2013, 04:14:45 PM »
Not telling.  :tongue:
[/quote
Hmmmmm
 

Offline SouthpawLink

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 995
  • Thanked: 54 times
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2013, 05:28:19 PM »
I've never gotten into trouble at Fish Eaters even though, on ocassion, I lose my patience and become snarky or sarcastic.  I'm also one of the most critical of Pope Benedict XVI; I don't call him a "heretic" but I do point out what I believe to be his errors (by contrasting his statements with those of the pre-Conciliar Magisterium).  There were one or two occasions where I mimicked his unorthodox positions (when being a "good Catholic" was under discussion), but I don't think anything ever came of that.

I still enjoy posting there overall, but I'm also of the opinion that the forum sways conservative ("neo-Cath") rather than traditional (which to me means serious criticism of Vatican II, the New Mass and the post-Conciliar Pontiffs and Magisterium).  Even still, it is far, far better than CAF could ever hope to become, and I am greatly indebted to Vox for all of the articles she wrote; she was certainly instrumental in my becoming a traditional Catholic.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2013, 05:31:31 PM by SouthpawLink »
"Is there no exception to the rule forbidding the administration of the Sacraments to baptized non-Catholics who are in good faith? In the case of those who are in good health, the prohibition is absolute; no dispute on this point is possible in view of the repeated explicit declarations of the Holy Office" (Rev. S. Woywod, A Practical Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, vol. I, sec. 625, p. 322ff.).

Contrast the above with the 1983 CIC, Can. 844 §3 & 4: "Catholic ministers administer the sacraments of penance, Eucharist, and anointing of the sick licitly to members of Eastern Churches which do not have full communion with the Catholic Church. . . .  If the danger of death is present or if, in the judgment of the diocesan bishop or conference of bishops, some other grave necessity urges it, Catholic ministers administer these same sacraments licitly also to other Christians not having full communion with the Catholic Church." — The phrase "properly disposed" does not save the canon from error, because the context shows that no conversion is expected on the part of non-Catholics ("manifest Catholic faith in respect to these sacraments" is the sole requirement).
 

Offline Mithrandylan

  • Doctor of Memeology
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2273
  • Thanked: 33 times
  • PhD in Sarcasticology
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2013, 05:31:49 PM »
It would be nice to see jackalpringeskewjr here
Ps 135

Quia in humilitáte nostra memor fuit nostri: * quóniam in ætérnum misericórdia eius.
Et redémit nos ab inimícis nostris: * quóniam in ætérnum misericórdia eius.
Qui dat escam omni carni: * quóniam in ætérnum misericórdia eius.
Confitémini Deo cæli: * quóniam in ætérnum misericórdia eius.
Confitémini Dómino dominórum: * quóniam in ætérnum misericórdia eius.

For he was mindful of us in our affliction: * for his mercy endureth for ever.
And he redeemed us from our enemies: * for his mercy endureth for ever.
Who giveth food to all flesh: * for his mercy endureth for ever.
Give glory to the God of heaven: * for his mercy endureth for ever.
Give glory to the Lord of lords: * for his mercy endureth for ever.

-I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-
 

Offline Jayne

  • Mary Garden
  • Major
  • ****
  • Posts: 16014
  • Thanked: 8497 times
  • Comic Sans Frontières
  • Religion: Roman Catholic
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2013, 06:14:31 PM »
I've never gotten into trouble at Fish Eaters even though, on ocassion, I lose my patience and become snarky or sarcastic.  I'm also one of the most critical of Pope Benedict XVI; I don't call him a "heretic" but I do point out what I believe to be his errors (by contrasting his statements with those of the pre-Conciliar Magisterium).  There were one or two occasions where I mimicked his unorthodox positions (when being a "good Catholic" was under discussion), but I don't think anything ever came of that.

You are consistently a gentleman.  I always appreciate that no matter how much I might disagree with what you are saying.
Jesus, meek and humble of heart, make my heart like unto Thine.
 

Offline trentcath

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2403
  • Thanked: 726 times
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #13 on: February 09, 2013, 06:29:13 PM »
I've never gotten into trouble at Fish Eaters even though, on ocassion, I lose my patience and become snarky or sarcastic.  I'm also one of the most critical of Pope Benedict XVI; I don't call him a "heretic" but I do point out what I believe to be his errors (by contrasting his statements with those of the pre-Conciliar Magisterium).  There were one or two occasions where I mimicked his unorthodox positions (when being a "good Catholic" was under discussion), but I don't think anything ever came of that.

I still enjoy posting there overall, but I'm also of the opinion that the forum sways conservative ("neo-Cath") rather than traditional (which to me means serious criticism of Vatican II, the New Mass and the post-Conciliar Pontiffs and Magisterium).  Even still, it is far, far better than CAF could ever hope to become, and I am greatly indebted to Vox for all of the articles she wrote; she was certainly instrumental in my becoming a traditional Catholic.

yes, it's certainly been getting more liberal and not by accident either.
 

Offline Kaesekopf

  • Enkindle in us the virtues of humility and patience So we too may obediently do your will faithfully.
  • Oberst
  • Major
  • *****
  • Posts: 21598
  • Thanked: 8360 times
    • Suscipe Domine
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Whos banned from Fisheaters?
« Reply #14 on: February 09, 2013, 09:08:24 PM »
It would be nice to see jackalpringeskewjr here

Took me a while to figure out who you meant.
Wie dein Sonntag, so dein Sterbetag.

I am not altogether on anybody's side, because nobody is altogether on my side.  ~Treebeard, LOTR

Jesus son of David, have mercy on me.