QuoteCommuniqué of the Society of Saint Pius X
April 15, 2024
Source: District of the USA
The American and Canadian districts of the Society of Saint Pius X are deeply affected by the conduct of their former District Superior, whose actions have wounded many souls and scandalized countless others.
On 4th April 2024, appearing before the criminal court in Gap (France), he admitted to sexual offences against minors, which occurred in France between 2003 and 2006, as part of his work with young people, and then again in 2013 and 2018 in a private context, also in France.
As far as we know, no crime was committed by this priest in the United States or Canada.
The Society of Saint Pius X does not have words strong enough to condemn these acts, which have irreparable consequences. It wishes to express its profound compassion for the victims, who it intends to support and help, as much as possible. It deeply regrets not having been able to protect the children entrusted to its care, and having placed its trust in this priest.
In 2014, after ambiguous and inappropriate attitudes were brought to their attention, the Society's Superiors withdrew the incriminated priest from the apostolate, entrusting him with administrative tasks without any responsibility, and under appropriate disciplinary supervision, firstly in Switzerland and then in Canada from 2019.
After his arrival in Canada, the Society's Superiors became aware of the existence of offences, under the jurisdiction of the courts, and they immediately reported them to the judicial authorities, in accordance with the norms in force in our society, and strengthened his disciplinary framework. Following this report, the necessary investigations were launched, culminating in the recent trial.
At no time and in no way were the actions of this priest covered-up by his Superiors.
Deeply distressed by this affair, the Society of Saint Pius X reaffirms its unwavering determination to do everything in its power to prevent the tragedy of pedophilia, and in particularly where priests are concerned. Its plan of vigilance for the protection of minors is the subject of regular reminders.
The Society of Saint Pius X also asks that we pray for the victims, who have been permanently wounded, after having their trust betrayed. It also asks that we pray for priests and for the Catholic Church, which has been tarnished by this new scandal.
sspx.org - 04/15/2024
Quote from: Baylee on April 15, 2024, 03:33:44 PMQuote from: Bonaventure on April 15, 2024, 03:23:38 PMWhatever theory ends up being correct, ultimately, only God will be able fix and solve this crisis. He will do so in such a clear fashion, that no men will be able to take even a morsel of credit.
That's why my days of being a keyboard warrior are mostly behind me. Bergoglio will continue to spew heresy. I will still have to fulfill my duties of state.
Convincing others that my position is the correct one, and stating that FSSPers, SSPXers, and even the Archbishop himself, are taking a position that is aligned with enemies of the Church - where does that get anyone? That savors of Dogmatic Sedevacantism, and goes contrary to the policy and rules of this forum - which is officially opionist.
If everyone on this forum, every single member, embraced Sede Vacante tomorrow, would that change anything?
Let's say that tomorrow, the Superiors General of the SSPX, FSSP, ICRSS, and all "regularized" trads embraced SV. Let's then say that all SV clergy - SGG, CMRI, even SSPV, all met up, conditionally consecrated and ordained everyone so that there were 0 doubts as to validity, did the same to all of the "Ecclesia Dei" or "motu" clergy, and we have all trad clergy officially Sedevacantist.
Would that solve the crisis? No - only God would. The NO apparatus would still continue on, and will continue on, until God decides to end this.
That's why, I am at the point in my life where I don't pay attention to the correct theory- whether the SSPX is right and Rome "converts," the totalist Sedes are right, the CT people are right, an eastern bloc "bishop in the woods" emerges, Siri was actually pope in exile and has his own hierarchy, etc it is going to take a miracle (such as the conversion of Bergoglio), just for the first domino to fall.
I often think of where I was in 2005, or 2006, trying my best to live Catholicism "in the parish," and then, as an FSSPer, SSPXer, and so on. I try to remain humble that this is a long journey that takes decades, and is still not over.
The only people I can think of that immediately declared and went SV in the late 1960s were Francis Schuckhardt and Joaquin Saenz Arriaga. Literally everyone else on earth was a "recognize and resister," at some point.
As to your bolded. If you think my point that those who think a Catholic pope can teach heresy and error to the universal church think similarly to those who have been against the papacy and the Catholic Church is the same as dogmatic sedevacantism, then ban me. I don't think it's the same thing, but I'm not going to pussy foot around here. I'm guessing there are a few posters who will be very happy with that.
QuoteDogmatic sedevacantism may be said to be a general attitude toward the current crisis in the Church which regards the state of the Seat of Peter to be practically de fide. This means that one who believes that the Seat is currently occupied has lost their Catholicity (or, at the very least, experiences a dramatically reduced Catholicity) due to grave error which is likely at least materially heretical.
Dogmatic sedevacantism is forbidden on this forum and is subject to moderation. While Suscipe Domine is a sedeplenist forum, sedevacantists are welcome to post here in all sub-fora. However, it is also the stance of the forum that the question of the loss of a valid papacy in the occasion of heresy is an open one among Catholics with no binding, universal Magisterial teaching on the subject. Therefore, Catholics are free to hold varying opinions on the legitimacy of the post-Conciliar papacies. Any posts which claim or even imply a superiority in the faithfulness or orthodoxy of Catholics who hold a varying opinion on the state of the papacy will be subject to discipline.
QuoteAmbassador Simona Halperin had earlier told the Russian state news agency RIA Novosti that her country expects "our Russian colleagues to condemn the unprecedented Iranian attack on Israeli territory."
In a post on her Telegram channel on Sunday, spokeswoman Maria Zakharova, responded: "Simona, remind me of when Israel condemned even a single strike by the Kiev regime on Russian regions? You don't know? Nor do I."
Quote from: Mushroom on April 06, 2024, 08:41:02 AMPut in a deposit for a Great Pyrenees puppy. Will be getting her in a little more than a week. We wanted something to protect our property from trespassers and guard the chickens and future animals from predators. Might get a second one in a few years. We've never had dogs growing up so this kind of a big deal.
Quote from: diaduit on March 25, 2024, 02:56:37 AMWhat Jews reject the Talmud?
Quote from: Bonaventure on April 15, 2024, 03:23:38 PMWhatever theory ends up being correct, ultimately, only God will be able fix and solve this crisis. He will do so in such a clear fashion, that no men will be able to take even a morsel of credit.
That's why my days of being a keyboard warrior are mostly behind me. Bergoglio will continue to spew heresy. I will still have to fulfill my duties of state.
Convincing others that my position is the correct one, and stating that FSSPers, SSPXers, and even the Archbishop himself, are taking a position that is aligned with enemies of the Church - where does that get anyone? That savors of Dogmatic Sedevacantism, and goes contrary to the policy and rules of this forum - which is officially opionist.
If everyone on this forum, every single member, embraced Sede Vacante tomorrow, would that change anything?
Let's say that tomorrow, the Superiors General of the SSPX, FSSP, ICRSS, and all "regularized" trads embraced SV. Let's then say that all SV clergy - SGG, CMRI, even SSPV, all met up, conditionally consecrated and ordained everyone so that there were 0 doubts as to validity, did the same to all of the "Ecclesia Dei" or "motu" clergy, and we have all trad clergy officially Sedevacantist.
Would that solve the crisis? No - only God would. The NO apparatus would still continue on, and will continue on, until God decides to end this.