Fr Joe Pfeiffer of the "Resistance" on Benedict XVI's "Satanism"

[Chestertonian]

Well, I hope this priest has some darn solid proof.  Otherwise he is in mortal sin.  It is called calumny.

I think if you spread rumors like this about a pope it is double-secret calumny.

[james03]

It's a mortal sin no matter what you call it.

[Arun]

Fr Pfeiffer was a real good priest back in the day. He did quite a lot for our family at one point. What the hell happened?

If that is the case, then I would think that you would feel an obligation to demonstrate common decency, if not charity, towards someone to whom you owe so much.

ok. where did i not?

if i go by the "do unto others" rule - i wouldn't smack a guy in the mouth for saying the same thing about me.... figure thats fair enough. feel free to hop off that horse and fill me in though.

[LouisIX]

This is ridiculous.  How did Father feel it was ok to come out with this if he has no proof?

[Elizabeth]

The talk is given on the 9th of this February, and more details are supposed to emerge in a couple of weeks...which gives us one more week of suspense or giving the benefit of the doubt or something.

[Kaesekopf]

Fr Pfeiffer was a real good priest back in the day. He did quite a lot for our family at one point. What the hell happened?

If that is the case, then I would think that you would feel an obligation to demonstrate common decency, if not charity, towards someone to whom you owe so much.

One of the other forums had supposedly first-hand news that Fr. Pfeiffer had brought a man (his family member) who had died 10 minutes previously back to life, and given him the Sacraments before he died for good.

If that is the case, then I would not want to risk my soul by attacking a man of God.

And yet this completely baseless calumny against Pope Emeritus Benedict is A-OK, when its source is the absolutely insane "ITCSS"?



Surely, you must be an agitator of some kind!

[Arun]

Surely, you must be an agitator of some kind!

i was wondering what washing machine he'd crawled out of

[Kaesekopf]

What moron would take Kevin Annett at his word?

Oh, and, by the way, Annett has been at this type of shenanigans for months now...

[Kaesekopf]

This is ridiculous.  How did Father feel it was ok to come out with this if he has no proof?

He read a story online man. 

[Elizabeth]

Why is this not being discussed at the "Resistance" forums?  The silence is deafening.

[Elizabeth]

And yet this completely baseless calumny against Pope Emeritus Benedict is A-OK, when its source is the absolutely insane "ITCSS"?

Are we certain this is Fr. Pfeiffer's source?  I am confused, but admittedly I only listened to about 5 minutes of his talk, starting at 23 minutes in. 

Considering the scrutiny of of each and every thing about the SSPX we have read over the past two years, I think it is safe to say they are not applying the same rigorous standards to themselves!!

[Kaesekopf]

Google for benedict and Satanism.  Itcss is the only source.   You think some of the anti Catholic media would pick up that ball and yknow,  beat it like a dead horse.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[Kaesekopf]

But cults don't have to worry about credibility, so Pfeiffer is ok.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

[Elizabeth]

Google for benedict and Satanism.  Itcss is the only source.   You think some of the anti Catholic media would pick up that ball and yknow,  beat it like a dead horse.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk

  Or those who despise what they've nicknamed, 'church of Fellay' -- and the bishop who was dying to make a deal with a satanic pope who sacrifices babies.  Wouldn't this be the most profound validation for their position, ever? 
   

[Kaesekopf]

Probably, Elizabeth.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk