Honest Question about Dress codes( warning could be triggering)

Started by AndiA, November 16, 2015, 09:37:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chestertonian

old ladies will hit you in the face with their purse if you wear a hat in churchregardless of canon law
"I am not much of a Crusader, that is for sure, but at least I am not a Mohamedist!"

Older Salt

Stay away from the near occasion of sin

Unless one is deeply attached to the Blessed Virgin Mary, now in time, it impossible to attain salvation.


Older Salt

Stay away from the near occasion of sin

Unless one is deeply attached to the Blessed Virgin Mary, now in time, it impossible to attain salvation.

MilesChristi

The world is charged with the grandeur of God.
    It will flame out, like shining from shook foil;
    It gathers to a greatness, like the ooze of oil
Crushed. Why do men then now not reck his rod?
Generations have trod, have trod, have trod;
    And all is seared with trade; bleared, smeared with toil;
    And wears man's smudge and shares man's smell: the soil
Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod.

And for all this, nature is never spent;
    There lives the dearest freshness deep down things;
And though the last lights off the black West went
    Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs —
Because the Holy Ghost over the bent
    World broods with warm breast and with ah! bright wings.

Lydia Purpuraria

Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 10:37:29 AM
I don't think so.

I will try it this Sunday.

At the Novus Ordo?
No TLM
Both Rites operate under the '83 Code.

Does the '83 Code trump immemorial custom, patristics, and Scripture?  (honest question)

Older Salt

Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 12:37:30 PM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 10:37:29 AM
I don't think so.

I will try it this Sunday.

At the Novus Ordo?
No TLM
Both Rites operate under the '83 Code.

Does the '83 Code trump immemorial custom, patristics, and Scripture?  (honest question)
No
That is why women should wear head coverings in church.
But the 83 code says otherwise.
Stay away from the near occasion of sin

Unless one is deeply attached to the Blessed Virgin Mary, now in time, it impossible to attain salvation.

aquinas138

Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 12:37:30 PM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 10:37:29 AM
I don't think so.

I will try it this Sunday.

At the Novus Ordo?
No TLM
Both Rites operate under the '83 Code.

Does the '83 Code trump immemorial custom, patristics, and Scripture?  (honest question)

No, but the Church has the authority to regulate its life. Previously it was a sin not to veil because the law mandated veiling; the law no longer mandates, so there is no longer a sin in not veiling. The law does not forbid veiling, so women are free to do so. Given that immemorial custom, patristics and Scripture all enjoin the practice, it is better to do so.
What shall we call you, O full of grace? * Heaven? for you have shone forth the Sun of Righteousness. * Paradise? for you have brought forth the Flower of immortality. * Virgin? for you have remained incorrupt. * Pure Mother? for you have held in your holy embrace your Son, the God of all. * Entreat Him to save our souls.

Clare

Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:50:47 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 12:37:30 PM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 10:37:29 AM
I don't think so.

I will try it this Sunday.
At the Novus Ordo?
No TLM
Both Rites operate under the '83 Code.
Does the '83 Code trump immemorial custom, patristics, and Scripture?  (honest question)
No
That is why women should wear head coverings in church.
But the 83 code says otherwise.
I thought the '83 code said nothing on the subject.
Motes 'n' Beams blog

Feel free to play the Trivia Quiz!

O Mary, Immaculate Mother of Jesus, offer, we beseech thee, to the Eternal Father, the Precious Blood of thy Divine Son to prevent at least one mortal sin from being committed somewhere in the world this day.

"It is a much less work to have won the battle of Waterloo, or to have invented the steam-engine, than to have freed one soul from Purgatory." - Fr Faber

"When faced by our limitations, we must have recourse to the practice of offering to God the good works of others." - St Therese of Lisieux

Older Salt

Quote from: Clare on November 20, 2015, 01:41:21 PM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:50:47 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 12:37:30 PM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 12:16:36 PM
Quote from: Lydia Purpuraria on November 20, 2015, 10:48:22 AM
Quote from: Older Salt on November 20, 2015, 10:37:29 AM
I don't think so.

I will try it this Sunday.
At the Novus Ordo?
No TLM
Both Rites operate under the '83 Code.
Does the '83 Code trump immemorial custom, patristics, and Scripture?  (honest question)
No
That is why women should wear head coverings in church.
But the 83 code says otherwise.
I thought the '83 code said nothing on the subject.
Yes, thus abrogating the older law.
Stay away from the near occasion of sin

Unless one is deeply attached to the Blessed Virgin Mary, now in time, it impossible to attain salvation.

piabee


Miriam_M

Quote from: piabee on November 20, 2015, 03:25:45 PM
Quote from: Miriam_M on November 18, 2015, 12:54:58 AM
In the Original Post.

Deference and subjugation are not the same thing.

Whatever.
I spoke neither about deference to men nor subjugation to men.  Please reread my posts; you will not find anything in mine about veiling in relation to men.

Again, I will quote my own post:
Quote from: Miriam_M on November 17, 2015, 07:51:08 PM
Regarding the issue of "subjugation," I never think of it in relation to men.  I think of it in relation to God only.  Before God do I and should I subjugate myself.  I therefore feel privileged to "display" that subjugation -- for want of a more appropriate word.  Affirm is perhaps a better word.

Miriam_M

elaborating more, piabee.

I think perhaps you misunderstood my term of subjugation to mean (for some reason, I'm not sure why)  in relationship to men.  But again, I don't know where you would have gotten that.
:shrug:

However, I do think many Catholic women, especially ones not well read on the issue, and especially modern feminists, regard the gesture as humiliating, and regard everything St. Paul says in his Epistles, regarding men and women, as an affront to women.  Many such women misread Paul.

In addition, I think they interpret the whole thing as a double-standard (vis-a-vis men, without understanding the theology behind it). 

I don't have that problem, however.
:)

Penelope

Quote from: james03 on November 20, 2015, 07:23:09 AM
An uncharitable reply, and I apologize.  I'll be taking this to the confessional.

James, on behalf of Kaesekopf and myself, thank you for your apology. Even though AndiA will not see it, others have seen it and will be assured that you were not trying to cast a bad light on this forum community or traditional Catholicism in general.

red solo cup

non impediti ratione cogitationis