Is Joseph a moderator?

[andy]

So, are you one of moderators of this Forum?

If you really cannot tell if I am a moderator or involved in running this forum, I am not.

Huh. Is it so hard to just say yes or no? Is it a game for you to play with other people? Besides, I asked the owner of this site, not you. No need to hijack every possible sub-thread.

[TerrorDæmonum]

Huh. Is it so hard to just say yes or no?

No.

Is it a game for you to play with other people?

No.

Besides, I asked the owner of this site, not you. No need to hijack every possible sub-thread.

This is the public forum and you wrote posted this while quoting one of my posts so it was, for all one could judge, a question directed at me:

So, are you one of moderators of this Forum?

So do not fault or accuse me of anything for answering a direct question you asked me.

I also cannot hijack a thread that is my own or about me. If the topic is mine or the topic is me, then how could I hijack it? A "sub-thread" is just a post on a thread, and it is bizarre to think that each individual post is directed only at particulars and it is a "hijacking" for others to respond. That is not how forums work.

As for the rest, if you want to ask the administrator something, contact him:

Not sure why this wasn't handled in a PM to the admin, or simply by reading the Forum Rules.

[andy]

Yes what?

[TerrorDæmonum]

Yes what?

So much for not reading my posts.

Anyway, I do think you are insane, at least, some of the time, and maybe responding to you is a form of game, but it was not intentional. I had no way of predicting that responding to a direct question would result in you saying you weren't asking me that question that you asked me about myself.

While you are not reading what I write, you once made a very strange accusation that I condemn self-defense "quite often" and I don't know why you stated that at the time, but I could only find few passing references and I did not condemn self-defense at all that I can find and you never followed up on this claim.

So, if you are under the impression that I have done things I have not done, I prepared a comprehensive examination of the morality of self-defense earlier today.

It is not really an interesting topic, but it is a topic and it is easy to clear up. Of course, whether you revise your claims about me or comprehend it are another story. You have a pretty strong and consistent record of claiming things about me without any basis in reality and imputing error where none exists and not being able to comprehend simple answers to simple questions.

But that is you, not me, and at least the record will show the truth.

[andy]

Yes what?

So much for not reading my posts.

This pertains to a specific question I asked Kaesekopf:

The moderator(s) are posted in the Forum Rules.

Forum Rules does not list name of moderators last time I checked. So who they are?

You interjected without being asked (the only reasonable explanation of doing so would be that you are indeed one of moderators) and this is the only reason I read those specific posts of yours in this thread. Is it clear enough?

Now, please respect this and let's wait what Kaesekopf says.

[TerrorDæmonum]

This pertains to a specific question I asked Kaesekopf:

Use of personal messages aside, do you think his answer would be any different? He already answered the question with referring to the Rules which lists the moderators and I already answered the question. Why ask it again?

Were you expecting answers to be different?

You interjected without being asked (the only reasonable explanation of doing so would be that you are indeed one of moderators) and this is the only reason I read those specific posts of yours in this thread. Is it clear enough?

It is clear you are not very lucid. I see no reason to think any user posting on the forum as any other user can is explained by being a moderator. That is such a bizarre thought.

Now, please respect this and let's wait what Kaesekopf says.

Respect what?

I'll wait to see what he says...but I wouldn't expect anything in particular. He is less prone to interacting with the insane on the forum repeatedly. If you really need him to answer the question of whether I am a moderator or not, you might want to send him a personal message.

As for this thread, it was made without respect and many responses on it were not concerned with respect, so I am using it the way I see fit.

[andy]

The moderator(s) are posted in the Forum Rules.

It does not seem to. Would update the rules with the current list of moderators?

[TerrorDæmonum]

The moderator(s) are posted in the Forum Rules.

It does not seem to. Would update the rules with the current list of moderators?

Who would update?

Remember, any thread or post about me is something is something I may respond to. You have a post title with my name with a question about me.

So, again, since the question was answered several times by more than one person:

• The Rules as written and quoted do list all moderators clearly by name
• I am not a moderator of this forum at this time.

Whether or not this suffices for you, I cannot tell, but these are clear rational answers to the question that was repeatedly asked and if you intend to have a personal correspondence with someone, you should contact them personally.

Anybody with a lucid mind would recognize that declaring a thread or post made about a person being somehow off-limits to that person is bizarre.

This thread, your post, calls me out by name and I will respond to it as I see fit and your commentary and accusations are meaningless: they are the mad rants of somehow who has a tenuous grasp on reality and logic.

Also, I am not fixated on you - I was just called out in this thread. Leave that thought out of your brain.

In any case, like with Xavier, I pretty much have stopped reading your posts all together. Good luck. Sincerely.

If you were sane, you could not possibly sincerely written this: you are fixated on me.

You repeatedly claim you don't read posts, as you seem to primarily read them, and you state you will ignore people, while you repeatedly respond to them and refer to them, and you go into a read only mode which contains several publications which would be worthy of  moral rejection for they take the form of things that would be grave sins. And it is not just me, it is Xavier, who you think a public thread telling him what to do on his own forum profile is somehow acceptable, but you think that if I respond to posts about me on the public forum, I am somehow playing the part of a moderator.

[andy]

The moderator(s) are posted in the Forum Rules.

It does not seem to. Would update the rules with the current list of moderators?

Given last Joseph's cryptic statement:

I am not a moderator of this forum at this time.

I expand the question to following: has he ever been moderator of this site in the past or are plans to have him in future?

[TerrorDæmonum]

Given last Joseph's cryptic statement:

It was just a singular precise statement. It was not intended to be cryptic.

I expand the question to following: has he ever been moderator of this site in the past or are plans to have him in future?

But now I think cryptic responses could be fun.

The answer to your expanded question is: I have not been a moderator of this forum in the past and there are no current plans to have me be a moderator in the future.

You may, however, want to realize there are more possibilities.

[Kaesekopf]

PM replied to, but the Forum Staff are listed in the Rules, as Joseph quoted.

The Forum Staff:
1) The moderators must be respected. When moderating they will use an italicized dark green font. For example: Please remain calm and charitable during all debates. Arguing with their decisions will not be tolerated. 
2) If you have a concern with a moderator decision, private message a member of the staff to address your concern.
3) The Moderator of Suscipe Domine forum is also the Administrator, Kaesekopf.

I expand the question to following: has he ever been moderator of this site in the past or are plans to have him in future?

Negative, to both.

[TerrorDæmonum]

Negative, to both.

A double negative, eh?

[Baylee]

PM replied to, but the Forum Staff are listed in the Rules, as Joseph quoted.

The Forum Staff:
1) The moderators must be respected. When moderating they will use an italicized dark green font. For example: Please remain calm and charitable during all debates. Arguing with their decisions will not be tolerated. 
2) If you have a concern with a moderator decision, private message a member of the staff to address your concern.
3) The Moderator of Suscipe Domine forum is also the Administrator, Kaesekopf.

I expand the question to following: has he ever been moderator of this site in the past or are plans to have him in future?

Negative, to both.

So, I take the bolded to mean there is only one moderator? You?

[TerrorDæmonum]

I have never seen such a simple and clearly expressed thing belaboured so much.

The reference to this forum as a type of asylum is perhaps more appropriate than I thought.

[Justin Martyr]

I have never seen such a simple and clearly expressed thing belaboured so much.

You don't interact with protestants much, do you?