Chinese dropping like flies

[Xavier]

An article from a couple of weeks ago arguing Iran's actual death toll is much higher than the reported cases:

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/irans-coronavirus-problem-lot-worse-it-seems/607663/

[John Lamb]

I want the medical "experts" to shut up already.  They are one important but not singularly important part of the equation.  Not normally a violent person, I wanted to punch a doctor in the face last night as he was waxing ecstatically about lockdowns.  To him -- and he admitted this -- the whole world is merely a lab, with his single goal to defeat a virus.  But Dr. whoever you are, we are not mere specimens.  Take off your white coat -- you, too, Dr. Fauci -- and get a reality check.  The United States of America is not merely your personal giant hospital.

This is the problem with putting "experts" in charge generally: they tend to see things only through the eyes of their expertise. Scientists will see the world as a lab, educators as a school, soldiers as a warzone, etc.

[mikemac]

K, man, you're starting to sound like someone playing a broken record...of someone playing a broken record...of someone playing a broken record...of someone playing a broken record.   Reminds me of those posters going on and on about geocentricism.  Which was obtuse.   Just sayin.  Be self-aware bro.

The broken records are those repeating their claims ad nauseam without addressing the objections I have raised to them. One person here has consistently engaged with me over the course of a few posts, and that's MikeMac. Nobody has bothered to address the assumptions behind the viral hypothesis or the problems with the diagnostic tests.

Are you a doctor or a virologist Kreuzritter?  Or do you have any medical credentials at all?

[queen.saints]

"Shelter in place".  Now things are making sense.  If you listen to academics arguing against the free market, you often hear about how the company exploits workers and makes them work in dangerous situations.  When they say that I know they've never worked an industrial job in their lives because everyone knows labor hates the safety fags and it is the company that imposes safety.

"Shelter in place" is a safety fag buzz word.  I just heard it a few weeks ago listening to one of the goofy safety videos we have to watch.  It's been around for going on 10 years, like "lean in".  Bottom line, the safety fags are in control, and that's really bad.

So true. It's absolutely impossible to get any work done if you follow all the safety rules. If you have a good safety officer, he'll just look the other way, but if you have a bad one, you just have to hope he's not looking. 

[Xavier]

Germany reports over 20,000 cases. ICU beds in some countries are in danger of being overwhelmed.

Nearly 12000 deaths worldwide amid 290,000 cases (for a death rate of about 4% among known cases).

https://www.dw.com/en/coronavirus-latest-germany-reports-over-20000-cases/a-52865061

"China has reported no new cases of locally transmitted infections for a third day in a row
Global reported cases surpass 275,000, with the global death toll above 11,000
Germany, Spain and Italy have more confirmed cases combined than China
Singapore has reported its first two deaths from the virus
The EU has suspended budget rules for Member States, allowing greater borrowing
Updates in Universal Coordinated Time (UTC/GMT)

13:30 Calls are growing louder for the Tokyo 2020 Olympic organizing committee to postpone the Summer Games due to the coronavirus crisis.

Brazil's Olympic Committee on Saturday said the event should be pushed back to next year because of the seriousness of the pandemic and "the consequent difficulty for athletes to keep their best competitive level.'' That plea followed similar requests from Norway, Slovenia and Colombia as well as the US track and field team.

The International Olympic Committee has said it plans to go ahead with the event in July, stating that it is too early to make a decision about whether it should be postponed or not."

[Xavier]

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/coronavirus-pandemic-spain-sees-5-000-new-covid-19-cases-in-a-day-1658223-2020-03-21

"Coronavirus pandemic: Spain sees 5,000 new Covid-19 cases in a day

Health authorities in Spain said the viral infections have reached 24,926, up from 19,980 the day before. Total deaths were 1,326, up from 1,002 on Friday."

Cases in Spain reach 25,000, up 5000 from the previous day.

I think the economy will come roaring back once the virus is defeated.

A temporary halt in production is not a permanent damage to the economy.

Companies will mass produce and easily make good for the break when it is over.

The first and most important thing now imho is to pray and work for it to be defeated.

[awkwardcustomer]

Don't panic.

[Kreuzritter]

Nearly 60 nuns test positive for COVID-19 at two convents outside Rome

Test positive according to what reliable test?

Xavier, Vetus, James - none of you can answer this question.

I think the economy will come roaring back once the virus is defeated.

A temporary halt in production is not a permanent damage to the economy.

This is delusional. Moreover, it abstracts reality into the word "economy" while ignoring the lives being destroyed. Just one example: a friend is a travelling nurse for surgeries and private surgeries have been shut down except for exceptional cases reviewed by the directors of hospitals, meaning all her upcoming bookings are cancelled and she has no prospect for work in this area for the immediate future; her son is a waiter and all restaurants have now been closed; she just paid her corporate tax and has a mortgage to pay; the son has rent to pay; hopefully she gets a break on the mortgage, but they also need money for food. Another friend works in finance and is waiting for a new venture to launch, which is being delayed; his girlfriend is an orthodontist and might be shut down, leaving them with zero income and large rent to pay, etc. If this persists even a little while longer, there is no "recovery" form this. It will plunge the masses into poverty and destitution. But there's more to it than that: if we are "bailed out", we are surrendering ourselves to socialist government as our keepers.

[Kreuzritter]

You realize that there are doctors inside the hospital in Bergamo being interviewed in the video, right? These are actual doctors, not paid actors.

They are the ones claiming they've never seen anything like this crisis. They're also the ones alerting to the fact that this virus is much more aggressive than the normal flu and that patients are over-flooding the ER and developping severe pneumonia. These are their testimonies, the reporter is merely echoing them.

I don't know about Italian doctors, but doctors in the UK are trained to repeat the claims of Big Pharma and prescribe lots of drugs and invasive procedures.  I've never encountered a doctor who thought outside the box.  They parrot the dietary guidelines, for example, while having zero training in nutrition, the same dietary guidelines which are making people sick across the Western world and beyond.

Italy is 2 trillion Euros in debt and its economy is a basket case.  Doctors are a susceptible as anyone to exaggeration if aid money depends on it.

Let's also not forget the antivirals they're sticking these people on. One of them is Ribavirin.

Ribavirin is a synthetic antiviral nucleoside analogue. In the treatment of hepatitis C it works very successfully in combination with a variety of other treatments but has no impact on hepatitis C on its own. It was originally developed as an antiviral agent for diseases that cause respiratory problems.

Ironically, one of the side effects of the chemical, apart from the usual fever, cough, vomiting diarrhea, etc., is difficulty breathing. In particular, it lowers red blood cell counts, decreasing red cell survival, and inhibiting red cell release from bone marrow. That in itself is going to cause issues with getting enough oxygen. Now give this same toxic shit to elderly people, most of them already chronically ill to begin with, and what do you think is likely to happen?

This is just typical of drugs used to treat alleged viral infections, like AZT used for HIV: it can cause the very symptoms of the disease.

Also from cardiosmart.org:

Ribavirin may decrease the number of red blood cells in your body. This is called anemia and it can be life-threatening in people who have heart disease or circulation problems.

One of the groups dying in Italy are eldery with cardiovascular issues. Can't make this up anymore.

It wouldn't surprise me one bit that the Italians are using some antiviral drug not being used in countries with much lower death rates. In fact, I'd be inclined to bet money on it.

Note how this has been completely ignored by Xavier, Vetus, etc.

[martin88nyc]

We Are Being Played -

Who exactly is handling the Corona Virus Task Force in the US?
I look in to the back ground of Debra Birx which leads us to PEPFAR, which leads us to Bono and Bill Gates and the swampy depths of the Frankenstein Medical Industrial Complex. It's GLOBAL.

read this blog from time to time just in case you get "paralyzed" by the media hype
https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/

[Kreuzritter]

http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

Rockefeller Foundation 2010: Scenarios for the Future ofTechnology and International Development

Scenario
Narratives


Lock Step




LOCK STEP



A world of tighter top-down government control and more
authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing
citizen pushback



In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been
anticipating for years finally hit. Unlike 2009's
HlNl, this new influenza strain — originating
from wild geese — was extremely virulent and
deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared
nations were quickly overwhelmed when the
virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly
20 percent of the global population and killing
8 million in just seven months, the majority of
them healthy young adults. The pandemic also
had a deadly effect on economies: international
mobility of both people and goods screeched to
a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and
breaking global supply chains. Even locally,
normally bustling shops and office buildings sat
empty for months, devoid of both employees
and customers.



The pandemic blanketed the planet — though
disproportionate numbers died in Africa,
Southeast Asia, and Central America, where
the virus spread like wildfire in the absence
of official containment protocols. But even
in developed countries, containment was a
challenge. The United States's initial policy of
"strongly discouraging" citizens from flying
proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the
spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but
across borders. However, a few countries did
fare better — China in particular. The Chinese
government's quick imposition and enforcement
of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well
as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of
all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping
the spread of the virus far earlier than in other
countries and enabling a swifter post-
pandemic recovery.



China's government was not the only one that
took extreme measures to protect its citizens
from risk and exposure. During the pandemic,
national leaders around the world flexed their
authority and imposed airtight rules and
restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face
masks to body-temperature checks at the entries
to communal spaces like train stations and
supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded,
this more authoritarian control and oversight
of citizens and their activities stuck and even
intensified. In order to protect themselves from
the spread of increasingly global problems — from
pandemics and transnational terrorism to
environmental crises and rising poverty— leaders
around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world
gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens
willingly gave up some of their sovereignty— and
their privacy — to more paternalistic states
in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for
top-down direction and oversight, and national
leaders had more latitude to impose order in the
ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this
heightened oversight took many forms: biometric
IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter
regulation of key industries whose stability



was deemed vital to national interests. In many
developed countries, enforced cooperation with a
suite of new regulations and agreements slowly
but steadily restored both order and, importantly,
economic growth.

Across the developing world, however, the
story was different — and much more variable.
Top-down authority took different forms
in different countries, hinging largely on
the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their
leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful
leaders, citizens' overall economic status
and quality of life increased. In India, for
example, air quality drastically improved after
2016, when the government outlawed high-
emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction
of ambitious government programs to improve
basic infrastructure and ensure the availability
of clean water for all her people led to a sharp
decline in water-borne diseases. But more
authoritarian leadership worked less well — and
in some cases tragically— in countries run by
irresponsible elites who used their increased
power to pursue their own interests at the
expense of their citizens.

There were other downsides, as the rise of
virulent nationalism created new hazards:
spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example.



19




Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP



wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch
of their national flag. Strong technology
regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high,
and curbed adoption. In the developing world,
access to "approved" technologies increased
but beyond that remained limited: the locus
of technology innovation was largely in the
developed world, leaving many developing
countries on the receiving end of technologies
that others consider "best" for them. Some

"IT IS POSSIBLE TO DISCIPLINE \

AND CONTROL SOME SOCIETIES \

FOR SOME TIME, BUT NOT THE \

WHOLE WORLD ALL THE TIME." \

- GK Bhat, TARU Leading Edge, India ;

governments found this patronizing and refused
to distribute computers and other technologies
that they scoffed at as "second hand."
Meanwhile, developing countries with more
resources and better capacity began to innovate
internally to fill these gaps on their own.



Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence
of so many top-down rules and norms greatly
inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists
and innovators were often told by governments
what research lines to pursue and were guided
mostly toward projects that would make money
(e.g., market-driven product development) or
were "sure bets" (e.g., fundamental research),
leaving more risky or innovative research
areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and
monopolistic companies with big research and
development budgets still made significant
advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs
remained locked behind strict national or
corporate protection. Russia and India imposed
stringent domestic standards for supervising
and certifying encryption-related products and
their suppliers — a category that in reality meant
all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back
with retaliatory national standards, throwing
a wrench in the development and diffusion of
technology globally.

Especially in the developing world, acting in
one's national self-interest often meant seeking
practical alliances that fit with those



Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP



interests — whether it was gaining access to
needed resources or banding together in order
to achieve economic growth. In South America
and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances
became more structured. Kenya doubled its
trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new
partnerships grew within the continent. China's
investment in Africa expanded as the bargain
of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for
access to key minerals or food exports proved
agreeable to many governments. Cross-border
ties proliferated in the form of official security
aid. While the deployment of foreign security
teams was welcomed in some of the most dire
failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded
few positive results.

By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of
so much top-down control and letting leaders
and authorities make choices for them.



Wherever national interests clashed with
individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic
pushback became increasingly organized and
coordinated, as disaffected youth and people
who had seen their status and opportunities slip
away— largely in developing countries — incited
civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria
brought down the government, fed up with the
entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those
who liked the greater stability and predictability
of this world began to grow uncomfortable and
constrained by so many tight rules and by the
strictness of national boundaries. The feeling
lingered that sooner or later, something would
inevitably upset the neat order that the world's
governments had worked so hard to establish. •



Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP



HEADLINES in lock step



Qjarantine Restricts
in-Person Contact;
Cellular Networks
Overloaded
(2013)



Italy Addresses
'Immigrant Caregiver'
Gap with Robots
(2017)



Vietnam to Require
'A Solar Panel
on Every Home'
(2022)



African Leaders Fear
Repeat of Nigeria's 2026
Government Collapse
(2028)




Intercontinental
Trade Hit by Strict
Pathogen Controls
(2015)



Will Africa's Embrace
of Authoritarian
Capitalism a la
China Continue?
(2018)



Proliferating Trade
Networks in Eastern
and Southern Africa
Strengthen Regional Ties
(2023)




ROLE OF PHILANTHROPY in lock step



Philanthropic organizations will face hard choices in this world. Given the strong
role of governments, doing philanthropy will require heightened diplomacy skills and
the ability to operate effectively in extremely divergent environments. Philanthropy
grantee and civil society relationships will be strongly moderated by government,
and some foundations might choose to align themselves more closely with national
official development assistance (ODA) strategies and government objectives.
Larger philanthropies will retain an outsized share of influence, and many smaller
philanthropies may find value in merging financial, human, and operational resources.

Philanthropic organizations interested in promoting universal rights and freedoms will
get blocked at many nations' borders. Developing smart, flexible, and wide-ranging
relationships in this world will be key; some philanthropies may choose to work only
in places where their skills and services don't meet resistance. Many governments
will place severe restrictions on the program areas and geographies that international
philanthropies can work in, leading to a narrower and stronger geographic focus or
grant-making in their home country only.



Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP





TECHNOLOGY in lock step



While there is no way of accurately predicting what the important technological
advancements will be in the future, the scenario narratives point to areas where
conditions may enable or accelerate the development of certain kinds of technologies.
Thus for each scenario we offer a sense of the context for technological innovation,
taking into consideration the pace, geography, and key creators. We also suggest a few
technology trends and applications that could flourish in each scenario.

Technological innovation in "Lock Step" is largely driven by government and is
focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological
improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments'
dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens. In states with poor governance,
large-scale projects that fail to progress abound.

Technology trends and applications we might see:

• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect
abnormal behavior that may indicate "antisocial intent."

• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages
is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business
environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.

• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The
application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite
for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many
diseases.

• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lower-
bandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel
is restricted.

• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their
own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China's firewalls.
Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but
these efforts nevertheless fracture the "World Wide" Web.



Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP



1

LIFE IN LOCK STEP

Manisha gazed out on the Ganges River, mesmerized by what she saw. Back in
2010, when she was 12 years old, her parents had brought her to this river so that she
could bathe in its holy waters. But standing at the edge, Manisha had been afraid. It
wasn't the depth of the river or its currents that had scared her, but the water itself:
it was murky and brown and smelled pungently of trash and dead things. Manisha
had balked, but her mother had pushed her forward, shouting that this river flowed
from the lotus feet of Vishnu and she should be honored to enter it. Along with
millions of Hindus, her mother believed the Ganges's water could cleanse a person's
soul of all sins and even cure the sick. So Manisha had grudgingly dunked herself
in the river, accidentally swallowing water in the process and receiving a bad case
of giardia, and months of diarrhea, as a result.

Remembering that experience is what made today so remarkable. It was now 2025.
Manisha was 27 years old and a manager for the Indian government's Ganges
Purification Initiative (GPI). Until recently, the Ganges was still one of the most
polluted rivers in the world, its coliform bacteria levels astronomical due to the
frequent disposal of human and animal corpses and of sewage (back in 2010, 89
million liters per day) directly into the river. Dozens of organized attempts to clean
the Ganges over the years had failed. In 2009, the World Bank even loaned India
$1 billion to support the government's multi-billion dollar cleanup initiative. But
then the pandemic hit, and that funding dried up. But what didn't dry up was the
government's commitment to cleaning the Ganges — now not just an issue of public
health but increasingly one of national pride.

Manisha had joined the GPI in 2020, in part because she was so impressed by
the government's strong stance on restoring the ecological health of India's most
treasured resource. Many lives in her home city of Jaipur had been saved by the
government's quarantines during the pandemic, and that experience, thought
Manisha, had given the government the confidence to be so strict about river usage

V J



Scenario Narratives LOCK STEP





now: how else could they get millions of Indian citizens to completely shift their
cultural practices in relationship to a holy site? Discarding ritually burned bodies
in the Ganges was now illegal, punishable by years of jail time. Companies found
to be dumping waste of any kind in the river were immediately shut down by the
government. There were also severe restrictions on where people could bathe and
where they could wash clothing. Every 20 meters along the river was marked by
a sign outlining the repercussions of "disrespecting India's most treasured natural
resource." Of course, not everyone liked it; protests flared every so often. But no
one could deny that the Ganges was looking more beautiful and healthier than ever.

Manisha watched as an engineering team began unloading equipment on the banks.
Many top Indian scientists and engineers had been recruited by the government to
develop tools and strategies for cleaning the Ganges in more high-tech ways. Her
favorite were the submersible bots that continuously "swam" the river to detect,
through sensors, the presence of chemical pathogens. New riverside filtration
systems that sucked in dirty river water and spit out far cleaner water were also
impressive — especially because on the outside they were designed to look like
mini-temples. In fact, that's why Manisha was at the river today, to oversee the
installation of a filtration system located not even 100 feet from where she first
stepped into the Ganges as a girl. The water looked so much cleaner now, and recent
tests suggested that it might even meet drinkability standards by 2035. Manisha
was tempted to kick off her shoe and dip her toe in, but this was a restricted area
now - and she, of all people, would never break that law.

V J

This reads like the blueprint for the narrative now being enacted live.

[Kreuzritter]

October 2019. What a joke. It takes the "big lie" effect to believe this is coincidence.

[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoLw-Q8X174[/yt]

[martin88nyc]

Kreuz, I posted the same PDF document at least 20 pages ago but it seems like no one is taking it seriously. We are dismissed as conspiracy theorists while Bill Gates "The Vaccine Wiz", Roceffeler Foundation, NATO, UN, and other diabolical bodies have been boldly programming the masses for years, "in-your-face" style.

[martin88nyc]

Epidemic: quarantining real science

by Jon Rappoport

March 20, 2020

This article is about fake science and the medical professionals who are hypnotized by it.

32 years ago, just after my first book, AIDS INC., was published, I was speaking with a doctor friend, a brilliant man. He criticized my strategy of showing how NON-VIRUS factors had destroyed the immune systems of "people with AIDS."

As evidence, he cited a UCLA study which had looked into the possibility that vast overuse of antibiotics was shredding the immune systems of gay men. "You see," he said, "the study found that many gay men who had been diagnosed with AIDS didn't abuse antibiotics. Therefore, those drugs couldn't be the cause of AIDS."

I was shocked. I was shocked that this doctor had fallen for absolute nonsense.

First of all, I had never said antibiotics were the cause of AIDS. He was confused at the starting gate.

To boil it down, my argument, in the book, was: for various specific reasons, HIV had never been proved to be the cause of what was being called AIDS. And—this was the key—"AIDS" was a label that had been placed, like an umbrella, over a whole host of diverse health conditions. At the root, AIDS was really IMMUNE SYSTEM DESTRUCTION coming from a number of different causes, depending on which group of people you were talking about.

And, in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, ONE OF THOSE CAUSES, IN SOME GAY MEN, was vast overuse of antibiotics.

My doctor friend hadn't understood this.

WHY NOT?

Here is the punch line. Through his training, he had been hypnotized into thinking that AIDS was one syndrome with one basic cause. "It had to be." 99 percent-plus of all doctors in the world had also been hypnotized in exactly the same way.

One label, one basic condition, one germ.

AIDS couldn't actually be a whole variety of causes, all of which suppress the immune system. No, no, no. That would be heresy.

The hypnosis sets up an either-or situation. "Show us the one cause of the one condition, or go away." And that is called medical science.

Imagine the following: six men in New Jersey suffer from sudden bleeding. So do eight women in New Guinea. So do twelve children in Uganda. A team of virus hunters from the CDC decides that all these occurrences must be linked by a common cause. Which, of course, will turn out to be a virus. But they're wrong. Dead wrong. It's not a virus.

In fact, there is no unifying "it." The six men in New Jersey were working in a factory where leaking acid fumes were getting into their lungs and creating hemorrhages. The eight women in New Guinea were farm workers overcome by highly dangerous pesticides, and they bled. The children in Uganda had been drinking water directly connected to sewage outlets, and in the sewage there were industrial poisons, and they bled.

This was not one condition. It did not have one cause. But too late—the CDC moves in, declares it's all a virus, and the name of the condition is X-32f54d. Journal articles are rushed into print. Public health officials warn that X-32f54d could spread...

You get the idea. The hypnosis works. It has nothing to do with science.

In the current "epidemic," we have the same old story. IT IS NOT ONE CONDITION. IT DOES NOT HAVE ONE CAUSE.

What are some of the causes which can induce the general flu-like and pneumonia-like symptoms being labeled "coronavirus?"

Ordinary flu. Pneumonia from different bacteria, fungi, toxic air. TB. Common colds. Allergies. In some places, perhaps the rollout of 5G technology. Toxic vaccination campaigns. Toxic medical drugs. Highly toxic and destructive antiviral drugs, given to people who are called "COV cases." Immobilization, long-term, in nursing homes for the elderly. Pesticides causing lung problems. Industrial poisons causing lung problems. People who have slight or serious congestion and are afraid they might "have the virus" and show up at hospitals. Corporate chemical dumping. Expired and unrefrigerated medical drugs shipped to the Third World. (The mere detection of elevated body temperature during airport screenings. People who had contact with other people who have been called "coronavirus cases." Overeager and work-harried doctors diagnosing "suspected cases.")

And so on and so forth.

NOT one condition with one cause.

NOT one condition.

NOT one cause.

Therefore, the "spread and containment of the one virus" is wrongheaded.

"But...but...suppose the patient tests positive for the coronavirus? Isn't that some kind of proof? Doesn't a positive test connect all these people with different conditions, under one banner?"

No. I have covered this in other articles. Even assuming that researchers actually discovered COV—the diagnostic test, at best, might indicate the patient has a tiny, tiny amount of COV in his body. But, in order to cause illness, he would need to have millions and millions of virus actively replicating in his body. The test has never been proved to be capable of detecting that.

And on top of all this, the overwhelming percentage of "COV cases" in the world have been diagnosed WITHOUT THE DIAGNOSTIC TEST for the virus.

Therefore, what we're left with are many people, with all sorts of different conditions, caused by many different factors—irrationally collected together under one label.

"But...but...what about all these people all over the world suddenly getting sick and dying?"

That's not a true picture. In many, many cases, these are people who have been getting sick and dying in the same ways people been getting sick for a long, long time, down through history For example, TB and pneumonia. In other cases, the causes could/would be new. For instance, new pollution, a recent vaccination campaign(s), the new rollout of 5G, the accelerated use of antiviral drugs. The other new factors are the re-labeling of all these people with a novel term: "COV";

And the press coverage, and the pronouncements of governments.

And then the lockdowns. And the economic warfare against the people.

[John Lamb]

This reads like the blueprint for the narrative now being enacted live.

Yeah this all does look like a grand psychological operation. I understand your frustration Kreuzritter, but I think your anger is misplaced. You should be angry at the demonic and human architects of this madness. Jesus was angry at the pharisees; He was compassionate towards the masses, "who were like sheep without a shepherd." Coincidentally the Jewish authorities were fans of psy-ops: the high priest's justification for murdering Jesus was, "it's better for one man to perish than the whole nation", so he used Our Lord as a tactical pawn in his game against the Roman occupants. That's the way the powers of this world tend to think. They look down on the people as pawns to be used to enact their grand strategies and ambitions, like Plato and his precept of using noble lies to string along the masses. The current world oligarchs are especially repugnant because of how smugly humanitarian they believe themselves to be. Champagne socialists in boardrooms and limousines who think they are the advocates of humanity when they are completely out of touch and sympathy with the common peoples of the world, unlike Jesus who went and lived with and among them. In any case, there's no need to fret. The wonderful thing is how God turns the plots of the wicked to good. Recently I've been letting go of the typical Trad view of history that we peaked in the middle ages and it's a slow and inevitable decline since then. I think the medieval church reached only a partial and rather compromised evangelisation of the world, and that the efforts of the masons (and the like) these past centuries to liberalise the nations and promote a global secular humanist NWO will backfire on them because it will turn into a platform for the gospel to truly spread to all peoples and for the Church to become truly universal.