Author Topic: What led you to Catholicism?  (Read 1997 times)

Offline Quaremerepulisti

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 3380
  • Thanked: 1030 times
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2017, 09:01:21 AM »
The divorce argument doesn't work.

Other Churches in union with Rome historically have been allowed to keep their practices of divorce and remarriage.

And at the Council of Trent, the Canon strangely reads the way it does: "If anyone says, that the Roman Church has erred by [teaching that second marriages are not allowed in the case of adultery] let him be anathema" instead of "If anyone says that second marriages are allowed in the case of adultery, let him be anathema" due to this.
 

Offline An aspiring Thomist

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 587
  • Thanked: 144 times
  • Religion: Roman Catholic
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #31 on: November 14, 2017, 02:09:13 PM »
Quote
And at the Council of Trent, the Canon strangely reads the way it does: "If anyone says, that the Roman Church has erred by [teaching that second marriages are not allowed in the case of adultery] let him be anathema" instead of "If anyone says that second marriages are allowed in the case of adultery, let him be anathema" due to this.

It seems like a distinction without a difference. So, would it be true then to say other Churches have not erred by teaching that second marriages are allowed in the case of adultery?
 

Offline Lumen Christi

  • Mary Garden
  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 623
  • Thanked: 639 times
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #32 on: November 14, 2017, 03:38:32 PM »
I would point out that the Orthodox Church only allows divorce up to three times IF AND ONLY IF there is a morally legitimate reason to do so, while the Roman Catholic Church allows divorce - excuse me, annulments - up to infinite times, and let me tell you something - almost every single annulment is granted.

"Only"?

Let me give you an example (although I personally think that this is legitimate):
"I can without a doubt prove that the Council of Trent is wrong about the necessity of only receiving one form of the Eucharist - one must receive both forms.
Why do you think Christ ONLY about the BLOOD said "Drink of this, ALL OF YOU," and He didn't say this about the Body - because Christ knew that in 1000 years time some disobedient Latin priests would come around and forbid the laypeople from receiving the Blood."
We receive the Blood in the Host.

The Host is the Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus, as is the Blood itself.

You don't receive "half" of Jesus under one species and "half" under the other.
 
The following users thanked this post: Vetus Ordo

Offline Vetus Ordo

  • Hopeful Fatalist
  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 1073
  • Thanked: 669 times
  • Religion: Old Christian
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2017, 04:25:55 PM »
"I can without a doubt prove that the Council of Trent is wrong about the necessity of only receiving one form of the Eucharist - one must receive both forms.
Why do you think Christ ONLY about the BLOOD said "Drink of this, ALL OF YOU," and He didn't say this about the Body - because Christ knew that in 1000 years time some disobedient Latin priests would come around and forbid the laypeople from receiving the Blood."

The "all of you" is the clergy (Apostles) to whom Christ is directly speaking when instituting the sacrament. He's not speaking to you and me, since none of us (unless we're priests) is going to do what He asked His apostles and sucessors to do in remembrance of Him.

As we know, the celebrant must eat the sacred host and drink of the chalice. On the other hand, the laymen may or may not do it. It's a matter of convenience and tradition, entirely dependant upon Church discipline. 
"All things are delivered unto me of my Father: and no man knoweth the Son, but the Father; neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son, and he to whomsoever the Son will reveal him." (Matt. 11:27).
 
The following users thanked this post: Gardener, Lumen Christi

Offline St. Columba

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
  • Thanked: 190 times
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #34 on: January 12, 2018, 12:09:09 PM »
The divorce argument doesn't work.

Other Churches in union with Rome historically have been allowed to keep their practices of divorce and remarriage.

Quare, how is this consistent with the safety of the Church's disciplines (which you believe in)?  I suppose one could argue that these concessions to Easterns coming in were not universal laws.  But can the Church make sinful provisions for entire blocks of Catholics?  (Especially on such momentous occasions as being received, en bloc, into the Church)
« Last Edit: January 12, 2018, 12:38:30 PM by St. Columba »
 

Offline St. Columba

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 606
  • Thanked: 190 times
Re: What led you to Catholicism?
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2018, 05:27:23 PM »
In other words, if Catholicism is an intrinsic aid to salvation, why aren't her laws protected from harm not only when universally promulgated, but when applied to specific groups of the faithful as well?

Related question: Is it possible for the 1990 Code of Canons for the Oriental Churches, for example, to be harmful to souls by endorsing a mortal sin?  The answer that it is not universal, therefore possible, seems weak.
« Last Edit: January 13, 2018, 05:29:01 PM by St. Columba »