Author Topic: Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail  (Read 247 times)

Offline ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 1513
  • Thanked: 2253 times
  • LET'S GO BRANDON!
  • Religion: Catholic
Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail
« on: December 12, 2021, 04:16:12 PM »
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/turley-gavin-newsom-calls-california-gun-ban-modeled-after-texas-abortion-law

Quote
California Gov. Gavin Newsom thrilled many this weekend by saying that his administration will model a new law on Texas’ abortion ban that would let private citizens sue anyone who makes or sells assault weapons or ghost guns. It won’t work. Legally, that is. It will be hugely successful politically, but not without costs to the state and potential litigants.
this page left intentionally blank
 
The following users thanked this post: TradGranny, Christe Eleison

Offline GiftOfGod

  • "The new mass, sacraments, and priests are bastards." - Archbishop Lefebvre, An Open Letter to Confused Catholics, page 116
  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2206
  • Thanked: 756 times
  • Religion: Catholic (traditional)
Re: Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2021, 05:37:16 PM »
Quote
First, the Texas law was quickly found to be unconstitutional, as would the California law. Indeed, many of us declared the law as facially unconstitutional under existing precedent on the day that it was enacted.
This came from the article. Do you agree that the Texas law is "facially unconstitutional"?
If attending Mass, the ordinary form as celebrated everyday around the world be sinful, then the Church no longer exists. Period.
Rather, if the NOM were the lex credendi of the Church, then the Church would no longer exist. However, the true mass and the true sacraments still exist and will hold the candle of faith until Our Lord steps in to restore His Bride to her glory.
We could compare ourselves to the Catholics in England at the time of the Reformation. Was it sinful for them to attend Cranmer's service?
We have to remind ourselves that all the machinery of the "Church" continued in place. They had priests, bishops, churches, cathedrals. But all of them were using the new "Book of Common Prayer" instead of the Catholic Mass. Ordinary lay people could see with their own eyes an enormous entity that called itself the "Church," but did the true Church still exist in that situation? Meanwhile, in small hiding places in certain homes were a handful of true priests offering the true Mass at the risk of imprisonment, torture and death.

 

Offline ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 1513
  • Thanked: 2253 times
  • LET'S GO BRANDON!
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2021, 06:53:42 PM »
Quote
First, the Texas law was quickly found to be unconstitutional, as would the California law. Indeed, many of us declared the law as facially unconstitutional under existing precedent on the day that it was enacted.
This came from the article. Do you agree that the Texas law is "facially unconstitutional"?

Who knows
this page left intentionally blank
 
The following users thanked this post: Christe Eleison

Offline GiftOfGod

  • "The new mass, sacraments, and priests are bastards." - Archbishop Lefebvre, An Open Letter to Confused Catholics, page 116
  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2206
  • Thanked: 756 times
  • Religion: Catholic (traditional)
Re: Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2021, 06:58:48 PM »
Quote
First, the Texas law was quickly found to be unconstitutional, as would the California law. Indeed, many of us declared the law as facially unconstitutional under existing precedent on the day that it was enacted.
This came from the article. Do you agree that the Texas law is "facially unconstitutional"?

Who knows
You shouldn't celebrate the law being temporarily allowed to stay in place if you don't even know if it's constitutional or not.
If attending Mass, the ordinary form as celebrated everyday around the world be sinful, then the Church no longer exists. Period.
Rather, if the NOM were the lex credendi of the Church, then the Church would no longer exist. However, the true mass and the true sacraments still exist and will hold the candle of faith until Our Lord steps in to restore His Bride to her glory.
We could compare ourselves to the Catholics in England at the time of the Reformation. Was it sinful for them to attend Cranmer's service?
We have to remind ourselves that all the machinery of the "Church" continued in place. They had priests, bishops, churches, cathedrals. But all of them were using the new "Book of Common Prayer" instead of the Catholic Mass. Ordinary lay people could see with their own eyes an enormous entity that called itself the "Church," but did the true Church still exist in that situation? Meanwhile, in small hiding places in certain homes were a handful of true priests offering the true Mass at the risk of imprisonment, torture and death.

 

Offline ChairmanJoeAintMyPrez

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 1513
  • Thanked: 2253 times
  • LET'S GO BRANDON!
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Gov. Nuisance's Stunt to Fail
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2021, 06:59:24 PM »
Quote
First, the Texas law was quickly found to be unconstitutional, as would the California law. Indeed, many of us declared the law as facially unconstitutional under existing precedent on the day that it was enacted.
This came from the article. Do you agree that the Texas law is "facially unconstitutional"?

Who knows
You shouldn't celebrate the law being temporarily allowed to stay in place if you don't even know if it's constitutional or not.

Disagree
this page left intentionally blank
 
The following users thanked this post: Christe Eleison