Quote from: Michael Wilson on April 28, 2024, 09:58:15 AM"Serving a usurper"; as far as I have investigated, there is not a single apparition that has happened after Vatican II that is legitimate; and many are probably diabolic in origin; such as the "Divine Will" revelations of Luisa Piccaretta etc. Catholics should avoid all these like the plague.
Quote from: Michael Wilson on April 28, 2024, 09:58:15 AMYou are the prime example of a Catholic that has been misled by erecting yourself as the ultimate judge of the authenticity of private revelations. You have cut yourself off from all objective reality in this matter.
Quote from: Michael Wilson on April 28, 2024, 04:14:41 PMQuote(2) There remains a single Catholic Church which has become unreliable in all of its declarations. (Why stop at sacraments?) As we all know, indefectible does not mean perfect in its individual membership nor its leadership; it means ultimately incorruptible. A Church which lacks credibility in its official declarations of binding dogma (not opinion and theories but binding dogma -- i.e., truths) has become corrupted.This is the crux of the problem; if the Catholic Church is a divine institution, then it should be reliable in all of its declarations, not just in its rare solemn pronouncements on dogma. What good is having a Church that can lead its faithful into sin and perdition except every 100 years or so, when it makes such pronouncements?
Quote from: Michael Wilson on April 28, 2024, 04:14:41 PMQuote(2) There remains a single Catholic Church which has become unreliable in all of its declarations. (Why stop at sacraments?) As we all know, indefectible does not mean perfect in its individual membership nor its leadership; it means ultimately incorruptible. A Church which lacks credibility in its official declarations of binding dogma (not opinion and theories but binding dogma -- i.e., truths) has become corrupted.This is the crux of the problem; if the Catholic Church is a divine institution, then it should be reliable in all of its declarations, not just in its rare solemn pronouncements on dogma. What good is having a Church that can lead its faithful into sin and perdition except every 100 years or so, when it makes such pronouncements?
Quote from: LausTibiChriste on April 25, 2024, 12:30:32 PMWe waited 19 days for my son, same reason as Bonaventure
Quote2. The clergy of the Institute shall not administer any sacraments to those who frequent the Novus Ordo Mass, unless they first manifest an intention of repudiating Vatican II and its reforms.
3. The clergy of the Institute shall not administer any sacraments to those who are invalidly married, or who are living as husband and wife after having received marriage annulments from the Novus Ordo, the Society of Saint Pius X, or any other person or entity.
4. The clergy of the Institute shall not administer any sacraments to those who frequent a Mass, even traditional, which is offered under the auspices of or with the approval of the Novus Ordo hierarchy, nor to those who frequent the traditional Mass in which members of the Novus Ordo hierarchy are mentioned in the Te igitur prayers of the Canon of the Mass, nor to those who recognize the Novus Ordo hierarchy as having the power to teach, rule, and sanctify the Catholic Church.
5. The clergy of the Institute shall not administer any sacraments to those who obstinately hold that the position of recognizing the Novus Ordo hierarchy as having the power to teach, rule, and sanctify the Catholic Church has theological probability, and may be legitimately held.
Quote from: Kaesekopf on April 28, 2024, 08:06:55 PMShe's been on the right-wing commentary sphere since 2019.
She married yet and started making babies?