Recent posts

#1

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by Greg - Today at 02:09:10 PM

My theory is that the vaccine when fresh and not correctly administered, (shaking the multi-dose bottle and aspirating the needle) causes a high degree of nasty side effects and deaths. 

One explanation I have seen is that the injection is supposed to be intra-muscular, but that hitting a vein is a more-or-less common side effect which allows the mRNA to travel through the body and attack vital organs such as reproductive organs for women and the heart for men.

This would represent a plausible and predictable level of error that could account for the percentage of deaths and other adverse events linked to the vaccines.

That would be fairly randomly distributed.  The side-effects data definitely showed that there were bad batches and vaccination centres and areas where there were a lot more deaths and serious side effects.

#2

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by Greg - Today at 02:06:01 PM

And if you are right and I am wrong, then you have a HUGE problem.  We all have a REALLY HUGE problem whether we are vaccinated or not.

The Pope himself and VERY many of his bishops said that taking the vaccine was the "morally right" thing to do.  When the Pope speaks on faith and morals or the bishops do we have to take them seriously.  If the head of the Catholic church says there is a moral duty to get a drug that turns out to be an AIDS bioweapon that kills 80% of Europe and the USA then the credibility of the Catholic Church is kaput forever.

The Church is only kaput if Franky boy is Pope.

And even if he is, he can SAY it is a moral issue, but it is not. I'm not well-read in this area, to be fair, but he can say anything is a moral issue - doesn't mean it is.

I don't think that argument will wash with the other 85% of the world who are not Catholics.

He fired Bishops over them saying people had a conscientious right to refuse the vaccine

He will be dead soon.  I don't think the church is likely to declare him an anti-pope anytime soon and certainly NOT BEFORE the posited 10-year Aids timebomb death vaccine kicks in.

#3

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by awkward customer - Today at 01:51:32 PM

The Pope himself and VERY many of his bishops said that taking the vaccine was the "morally right" thing to do.

The globalist stooge apostates who currently occupy the Vatican would say that.

#4

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Michael Voris Forced Out o...

Last post by Greg - Today at 01:36:48 PM

Here is an insider from CM speaking about "the leak"

#5

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by Maximilian - Today at 01:27:27 PM

My theory is that the vaccine when fresh and not correctly administered, (shaking the multi-dose bottle and aspirating the needle) causes a high degree of nasty side effects and deaths. 

One explanation I have seen is that the injection is supposed to be intra-muscular, but that hitting a vein is a more-or-less common side effect which allows the mRNA to travel through the body and attack vital organs such as reproductive organs for women and the heart for men.

This would represent a plausible and predictable level of error that could account for the percentage of deaths and other adverse events linked to the vaccines.

#6

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by LausTibiChriste - Today at 01:26:46 PM

And if you are right and I am wrong, then you have a HUGE problem.  We all have a REALLY HUGE problem whether we are vaccinated or not.

The Pope himself and VERY many of his bishops said that taking the vaccine was the "morally right" thing to do.  When the Pope speaks on faith and morals or the bishops do we have to take them seriously.  If the head of the Catholic church says there is a moral duty to get a drug that turns out to be an AIDS bioweapon that kills 80% of Europe and the USA then the credibility of the Catholic Church is kaput forever.

The Church is only kaput if Franky boy is Pope.

And even if he is, he can SAY it is a moral issue, but it is not. I'm not well-read in this area, to be fair, but he can say anything is a moral issue - doesn't mean it is.

#7

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by Greg - Today at 01:20:47 PM

And if you are right and I am wrong, then you have a HUGE problem.  We all have a REALLY HUGE problem whether we are vaccinated or not.

The Pope himself and VERY many of his bishops said that taking the vaccine was the "morally right" thing to do.  When the Pope speaks on faith and morals or the bishops do we have to take them seriously.  If the head of the Catholic church says there is a moral duty to get a drug that turns out to be an AIDS bioweapon that kills 80% of Europe and the USA then the credibility of the Catholic Church is kaput forever.

#8

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Francis letter against Ger...

Last post by EastWest7 - Today at 01:06:00 PM

Hmm Francis having a slight change of heart maybe, well its possible, great line:

"I sought not to find "salvation" in constantly evolving committees, nor to persist in self-absorbed dialogues rehashing the same themes"

It sounds like a condemnation of the Synod itself.  Absolutely bizarre.

Well, indeed it is bizarre. As much as I'd like to think that given Francis' advanced age and his consideration of his eternal destination; I don't trust him.

Given his history of sending mixed messages and the Peronist strategy of "two steps forward, one step backward", I tend to think this is a political move for his agenda.
Or perhaps Francis fears what the pushback might be against his destruction of the Catholic faith if a schism should ensue. 

[The virus can remain dormant in the human body for up to ten years after primary infection; during this period the virus does not cause symptoms.]

#9

General News and Discussion / Re: Argentine Elects New Presi...

Last post by Greg - Today at 12:53:31 PM

I would caution you on this though.

HIV is a member of the genus Lentivirus,[15] part of the family Retroviridae.[16] Lentiviruses have many morphologies and biological properties in common. Many species are infected by lentiviruses, which are characteristically responsible for long-duration illnesses with a long incubation period.[17] Lentiviruses are transmitted as single-stranded, positive-sense, enveloped RNA viruses. Upon entry into the target cell, the viral RNA genome is converted (reverse transcribed) into double-stranded DNA by a virally encoded enzyme, reverse transcriptase, that is transported along with the viral genome in the virus particle. The resulting viral DNA is then imported into the cell nucleus and integrated into the cellular DNA by a virally encoded enzyme, integrase, and host co-factors.[18] Once integrated, the virus may become latent, allowing the virus and its host cell to avoid detection by the immune system, for an indeterminate amount of time.[19] The virus can remain dormant in the human body for up to ten years after primary infection; during this period the virus does not cause symptoms.

Australian COVID vaccine terminated due to HIV 'false positives'
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australian-covid-vaccine-terminated-due-to-hiv-false-positives-20201210-p56mju.html

Not trying to scare those who've taken it and we hope for the best, but I cannot escape the fact that you don't go to that much effort for money alone or some other benign reason and we know how they feel about 'over population' and 'climate change' which they fail to mention, the human being is carbon based and a source which will only increase despite their best efforts with the breakdown of the family, living costs, contraceptives, abortion, feminism and LGBTQIA agendas etc...

OK, I am cautioned.  I'll admit, that it is POSSIBLE that the vaccine is some sort of super duper bio-tech population reduction time bomb.  But we're talking UBER levels of competence to design and build a bio-weapon like that.  It would be way beyond what genetic engineers are capable of today.  I've listened to on-line lectures on this stuff in the last 3 years.

So my money is on that being nonsense.  Cock-up explains things more than conspiracy.  My theory is that the vaccine when fresh and not correctly administered, (shaking the multi-dose bottle and aspirating the needle) causes a high degree of nasty side effects and deaths.  Quality control in the manufacturing could also account for it, the mass production of that vaccine was a quality control nightmare because it was bum-rushed.  There simply were not enough quality control people to monitor the manufacturing process of so many vaccines in such a short space of time.

The other problem is that the people who complied are weak-minded sheep.  The ones that would not die of your hypothesised AIDS-like virus are the conspiracy rebels who hate your guts since they are unvaccinated.  So there is a terrible flaw in the plan there.

If you went to a centre where it was stored properly but administered badly that was the greatest risk.  If you went to somewhere it was stored poorly then your risk went down because the active ingredient was made inert by heat.  This explains the patchy deaths high in some places and low to extremely low in others.

Finally, Bill Gates is involved.  I don't believe the man who screwed up Windows as many times as he did is capable of pulling a team of uber clever bio-engineers together, when he could not get computer software developers to make Windows work properly.  It's just too out of character for Gates.

#10

The Sedevacantist Thesis / Re: Sorry Sedes

Last post by LausTibiChriste - Today at 12:29:57 PM

What was the point of Bennyvacantism?

Ratzinger might as well have been in a coma or dead during his retirement.  He said and did absolutely nothing to oppose Bergoglio.

A more useless twat of a Pope it is hard to imagine.

Ratzinger was worse than JPII - I've said it before. JPII was obvious, Ratzinger hid under a cloak of traditionalism that attracted Trads.

I was generally a Bennyvacantist, in that I'm not a sede but I also do not believe Frank to be Pope, so Bene was it...but what was the point? Hardcore bennyvacantists couldn't see past their own nose - where do you stand when he dies? Now he's dead and they're ignoring the issue of "who's Pope now?"

Logically, you're a sede now. But very very very few BVers will admit that.

If you are a BVer, you should have no logical issue going to a sede Mass now that he's dead.