The Truth about Sugar, Carbs, and Fats

[Croix de Fer]

Peer-reviewed science

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMmTD-U8bIU[/yt]

[Croix de Fer]

Peer-reviewed science

[yt]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMmTD-U8bIU[/yt]

More:

A rice-fruit diet reverses ECG changes in hypertension.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24996514

Dietary intake of fruit & rice, and abstaining from fats, oils & excess animal protein, reverses hypertension and cures type 2 diabetes.

Abstract
In 1940, a young German refugee physician scientist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina began to treat patients with accelerated or "malignant" hypertension with a radical diet consisting of only white rice and fruit, with strikingly favorable results. He reported rapid reduction in blood pressure, rapid improvement in renal failure, papilledema, congestive heart failure and other manifestations of this previously fatal illness. This treatment was based on his theory that the kidney had both an excretory and a metabolic function, and that removing most of the sodium and protein burden from this organ enabled it to regain its normal ability to perform its more important metabolic functions. It was also effective in "ordinary" hypertension, in the absence of the dramatic vasculopathy of the accelerated form. The results were so dramatic that many experienced physicians suspected him of falsifying data. Among these results was the normalization of the ECG changes seen with hypertension. This paper reviews his published experience with this radical therapy, its controversial rise to fame, and its decline in popularity with the advent of effective antihypertensive drugs. It features the ECG changes seen in this then fatal disease, and the reversal of these changes by the rice diet. This treatment, though very difficult for the patient, produced effects which make it equal or superior to current multi-drug treatment of hypertension. A poorly known but important observation was that patients who were able to follow the regime, and who were slowly guided through a gradual modification of the diet over many months, were able to transition into a very tolerable low fat, largely vegetarian diet, while leading a normal, active life, without medications, indicating that the disease state had been permanently modified.

-----------------------------------

Improved Glucose Tolerance with High Carbohydrate Feeding in Mild Diabetes


https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM197103112841004

A diet high in carbs & sugars, and low in fats, oils and animal protein, cures type 2 diabetes.

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of increased dietary carbohydrate in diabetes mellitus, glucose and immunoreactive insulin levels were measured in normal persons and subjects with mild diabetes maintained on basal (45 per cent carbohydrate) and high carbohydrate (85 per cent carbohydrate) diets. Fasting plasma glucose levels fell in all subjects and oral glucose tolerance (0 to 120-minute area) significantly improved after 10 days of high carbohydrate feeding. Fasting insulin levels also were lower on the high carbohydrate diet; however, insulin responses to oral glucose did not significantly change. These data suggest that the high carbohydrate diet increased the sensitivity of peripheral tissues to insulin.

----------------------------------------

A prospective study of sugar intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in women.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12663565

Eating sugar and abstaining from fats, oils and excess animal protein cures type 2 diabetes in women.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate prospectively whether intake of total or type of sugar is associated with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The contribution of sugar intake to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes has not been settled in the context of primary prevention because of limited prospective data.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:
The Women's Health Study is a randomized controlled trial of aspirin and vitamin E in the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. A validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire was completed by 39,345 women aged 45 years and older. The main outcome was the incidence of type 2 diabetes. The predictor was sugar intake, including sucrose, glucose, fructose, and lactose. Using Cox proportional hazard models, multivariate RRs of type 2 diabetes for increasing quintiles of sugar intake compared with the lowest quintile were estimated.

RESULTS:
Compared with the lowest quintile of sugar intake, the RRs and 95% CIs for the highest quintiles were 0.84 (0.67-1.04) for sucrose, 0.96 (0.78-1.19) for fructose, 1.04 (0.85-1.28) for glucose, and 0.99 (0.80-1.22) for lactose, after adjustment for known risk factors for type 2 diabetes. Similar findings of no association were obtained in subgroup analyses stratified by BMI.

CONCLUSIONS:
Intake of sugars does not appear to play a deleterious role in primary prevention of type 2 diabetes. These prospective data support the recent American Diabetes Association's guideline that a moderate amount of sugar can be incorporated in a healthy diet.

----------------------------------------------------

Increased incidence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus among Japanese schoolchildren correlates with an increased intake of animal protein and fat.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9492119

Eat excess animal protein and fat, get type 2 diabetes.

Abstract
Non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) was diagnosed in 188 of more than 7 million Tokyo schoolchildren tested between 1974 and 1994 for glycosuria followed by oral glucose tolerance testing. The incidence rate of NIDDM in youth has continued to increase since 1976. While the daily energy intake has not changed significantly, the consumption of animal protein and fat by the Japanese population has greatly increased during the past two decades, and this change in diet, with low levels of physical activity, may exacerbate insulin resistance and glucose intolerance.

---------------------------------------

A prospective study of red meat consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women: the women's health study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15333470

Eat red meat, get type 2 diabetes.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the relation between red meat intake and incidence of type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:
Over an average of 8.8 years, we evaluated 37,309 participants in the Women's Health Study aged >/=45 years who were free of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes and completed validated semiquantitative food frequency questionnaires in 1993.

RESULTS:
During 326,876 person-years of follow-up, we documented 1,558 incident cases of type 2 diabetes. After adjusting for age, BMI, total energy intake, exercise, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and family history of diabetes, we found positive associations between intakes of red meat and processed meat and risk of type 2 diabetes. Comparing women in the highest quintile with those in the lowest quintile, the multivariate-adjusted relative risks (RRs) of type 2 diabetes were 1.28 for red meat (95% CI 1.07-1.53, P < 0.001 for trend) and 1.23 for processed meat intake (1.05-1.45, P = 0.001 for trend). Furthermore, the significantly increased diabetes risk appeared to be most pronounced for frequent consumption of total processed meat (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.17-1.75 for >/=5/week vs. <1/month, P < 0.001 for trend) and two major subtypes, which were bacon (1.21, 1.06-1.39 for >/=2/week vs. <1/week, P = 0.004 for trend) and hot dogs (1.28, 1.09-1.50 for >/=2/week vs. <1/week, P = 0.003 for trend). These results remained significant after further adjustment for intakes of dietary fiber, magnesium, glycemic load, and total fat. Intakes of total cholesterol, animal protein, and heme iron were also significantly associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS:
Our data indicate that higher consumption of total red meat, especially various processed meats, may increase risk of developing type 2 diabetes in women.

----------------------------------------

Dietary composition and fat to sugar ratios in relation to obesity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7894521

Eat sugar and abstain from fats, you will lose body fat.

Abstract
The aim of this work was to investigate the relationship between dietary composition and prevalent overweight and obesity in a middle-aged Scottish population. An age and sex stratified cross-sectional study was carried out of coronary risk factors and diet. This was based on a personal health and food frequency questionnaire with a clinic attendance for body measurements which included weight and height. The subjects were 11,626 men and women aged 25-64 who participated in the baseline Scottish Heart Health and MONICA studies. Those reporting to be on slimming diets were excluded. The subjects were contacted via ten general practitioners surgeries from each of 22 Scottish districts (12 Mainland Health Boards) surveyed during 1984-1986. The following were measured: (1) the prevalence of overweight (BMI 25-28.6 for women and 25-30 for men) and obesity (BMI > 28.6 for women, and > 30 for men) according to intake fifths of carbohydrates (starch, total, extrinsic, intrinsic and milk sugars) and fat to carbohydrate ratios; (2) the percentage of the variance in BMI explained by multivariate analysis models which included each of the sugar variables and total energy intake. The overall prevalence of overweight and obesity in the Scottish population were 43 and 11% for men and 38 and 14% for women respectively. Their prevalence increased from the lowest to the highest fifth of Fat:ES intake, respectively for men and women, from 5 to 18.5% and from 13 to 26%. The prevalence of overweight and obesity declined from the lowest to the highest fifth of total carbohydrate, total (TS) and extrinsic (ES) sugar intake.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS).

-------------------------------------------

Insulin Deficiency and Insulin Inefficiency

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2177399/?page=1

Diet high in carbs & sugar, and low in fats, oils and animal protein, increases insulin SENSITIVITY, thereby, curing type 2 diabetes. Conversely, a diet high in fats, oils & animal protein, and low in carbs & sugar, increases insulin RESISTANCE, thereby causing type 2 diabetes. A diet high in both carbs/sugar & fats/oil/animal protein has a synergistic effect of maximizing insulin RESISTANCE, thereby, inducing, more expeditiously and intensely, type 2 diabetes, hypertension & obesity.
------------------------------------------

The relation of the hypophysis to changes in sugar tolerance and insulin sensitivity induced by changes of diet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1395148/

A diet with moderate to high sugar, and low fats, oils & animal protein increases insulin sensitivity, thereby, helping prevent or cure type 2 diabetes.
-----------------------------------------

Carbohydrates, fat, and insulin action.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8116551

A diet high in carbs/sugar and low in fats, oils & animal protein induces insulin sensitivity. The effect of insulin sensitivity is helping prevent and cure type 2 diabetes. A diet high in fats, oils & animal protein induces insulin resistance, and this effect is a higher probability of type 2 diabetes, hypertension & obesity.

Abstract
Insulin resistance is a common disorder and is seen in many conditions that are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (eg, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cigarette smoking). The role of the diet, irrespective of degree of obesity, in modulating insulin sensitivity is uncertain. An extremely high carbohydrate-fat ratio improves insulin sensitivity whereas more moderate changes (40-60% carbohydrate) produce less convincing results. However, increased fasting concentrations of triglycerides and lower concentrations of high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol have frequently been seen with these diets, together with lower concentrations of low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. High-carbohydrate diets based on foods with a low glycemic index combined with a high dietary fiber content should be evaluated. Such diets may produce the desired effects while they prevent unwanted increases in fasting triglyceride concentrations and lower HDL cholesterol.

----------------------------------------

[Greg]

Aren't a lot of the top scientists joos?

[awkwardcustomer]

You've blown it now, Croix de Fer.

Dr John McDougall is a vegan and the term  'peer-reviewed science' means nothing other than flaky and deceptive science. He is talking so much rubbish in the video that it is almost unbearable. 

The vegan diet is the NWO slave diet and Dr John McDougall is just another stooge.  Fat does NOT make people fat.  Carbohydrates make people fat.  The great health disaster of the modern age has been cause by fools like Dr John McDougall and his cohorts hectoring people to give up healthy saturated animal fats and replace them with toxic industrial seed oils, to name but one example.

I could go on and on.  But there is not  a single randomised controlled study anywhere in the world that demonstrates a causal link between saturated fat consumption and heart disease.  Peer-reviewed science is soft science and is subject to confirmation bias, which is hardly surprising since the entire dietetics industry was founded by the cultish Seventh Day Adventist Church which advocates a plant based diet because an angel told a founding member to do this.  This is true, believe it or not.  Mr Kellog, who invented cornflakes and persuaded everyone to eat toxic peanut butter, was also a Seventh Day Adventist.  You couldn't make it up.

You should look into this.  It's the biggest conspiracy theory of all, except it isn't a theory. Also look into the NWO plan to turn everyone vegan and check out how Ancell Keys fiddled his figures.

[awkwardcustomer]

Dr Gary Fettke is an orthopedic surgeon based in Tasmania, Australia.  He put his diabetic patients on a low carb diet and found that their need for further amputations decreased.  When his low carb diet actually started to reverse Type II Diabetes among patients in general, he came up against the power of the Australian Dietetics Industry which tried to silence him. 

Here his wife, Belinda Fettke describes how her husband's battle with the dietary establishment led her to investigate how the plant based diet came to be accepted as ideal, when in fact it is the cause of myriad health problems.

[Jayne]

Aren't a lot of the top scientists joos?

McDougall is clearly Jewish.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he is a Jew which is all the proof we need.  Only a Jew would be able to destroy all the evidence like that.

[paul14]

Aren't a lot of the top scientists joos?

McDougall is clearly Jewish.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he is a Jew which is all the proof we need.  Only a Jew would be able to destroy all the evidence like that.

https://soundcloud.com/ssinger1485/magical-shape-shifting-jews

[Graham]

And now a diet kook on the opposite extreme emerges. Crazy diet horseshoe theory when?

[Graham]

Diet Cuck 1: "Eat nothing but meat and saturated fat! Everything else will kill you!"

Diet Cuck 2: "Eat nothing but white rice and fruit! Everything else will kill you!"

The Balanced Chad eschews both extremes

[Greg]

This is what Croix de Fer said about Peer Reviewed science at the other place.

https://www.cathinfo.com/the-catholic-bunker/high-profile-researcher-admits-fabricating-scientific-results-published/msg467082/#msg467082

Too many sheeple take "science" as dogmatic truth. Their (lib-tards, atheists, humanists, agnostics, et al) "bibles" are peer review studies and academic journals.

[awkwardcustomer]

Aren't a lot of the top scientists joos?

McDougall is clearly Jewish.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he is a Jew which is all the proof we need.  Only a Jew would be able to destroy all the evidence like that.

I think Greg was joking.  Besides, it's the Seventh Day Adventist Church that we should be looking at for the background to the plant foods are good/animal foods are bad nonsense that is accepted as truth today.

Didn't you mention this earlier somewhere?   Ellen G White, one of the founder members of the Seventh Day Adventists was visited by an 'angel' who told her to promote plant based diets. This raises the question - how did a cult inspired by messages from an 'angel' become a major player in the dietary industry, influencing the eating habits of millions of people?   This reminds me of Alcoholic Anonymous, another cult that has a complete stranglehold on the addiction industry.  Bill Wilson, an AA co-founder, was inspired by the spirit of a 12th century monk to write the 12 Step Programme.

How did this happen?  Our low fat/high carb, plant food diets diets are the result of advice from dubious supernatural beings, as are our addiction treatment programmes.  You couldn't make it up.

[Jayne]

Aren't a lot of the top scientists joos?

McDougall is clearly Jewish.  There is no evidence whatsoever that he is a Jew which is all the proof we need.  Only a Jew would be able to destroy all the evidence like that.

I think Greg was joking.  Besides, it's the Seventh Day Adventist Church that we should be looking at for the background to the plant foods are good/animal foods are bad nonsense that is accepted as truth today.

Greg was making a reasonable point about inconsistencies in Croix-de-Fer's views.  I was using sarcasm to agree with Greg.  (Nobody expects me to agree with Greg. My chief weapon is the element of surprise.)

But seriously, the medical establishment's acceptance of the false idea that animal foods are bad reminds me of the circumcision debate.  The Jewish-dominated medical profession accepted and spread the idea that circumcision was a medically necessary procedure when there is little, if any, science to support this view.  Yet it is now commonly believed.  Similarly, religious views of Seventh Day Adventists were foisted on society under the guise of science.

[awkwardcustomer]

Similarly, religious views of Seventh Day Adventists were foisted on society under the guise of science.

Which is why it's so important that people realise that the plant-based diet is not being promoted for the sake of people's health, but for ideological/religious reasons.  And it's especially important because the NWO diet will be the vegan diet.

[Croix de Fer]

I know from experience. My longtime diet has been 80% - 90%  carbs/sugar, 10% - 15% protein, and 5% - 10% fat.
I'm single digit body fat and lean musculature. I have the energy to run at least 55 miles a week. My strength-to-weight ratio is in the top 1% of men. I still have the mental and physical energy to get things done in life, even after all of my fitness training.

I'm willing to bet every dissident who commented here is at least somewhat overweight and they can't tackle 1/10 of my physical regimen. What's your body fat %? The scale doesn't lie. Even more true, the body fat scale doesn't lie. Your ketosis brains and bodies simply can't hang with a specimen like me.

I have the science and experience to back it all up.

[Greg]

And this is me leading the London Marathon in 1988.  Every dog has his day.



Since then I got married to a beautiful Russian woman, had six children and got fat and old.

You're thin, but single.  You'll be old too, just like the rest of us.  But you'll always be single, because you're a giant w4nker and women are not stupid enough to marry you.

I have the experience of neo-nazi Trads, and their failed lives, to back this up.