The optics on these rallies are just terrible.
Given he has ALL of Silicon Valley on his side and his main political point is that Trump is highly irresponsible to be campaigning, why would he not get together with Google, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram and hold on-line rallies, where they could manipulate the viewing figures, precisely target demographics and areas of the country with precise messages etc. They could claim a million people watched it, 2 million, they could have bot accounts sending in questions and emojis.
I see absolutely ZERO upside in holding a rally where less than 20 people show up. It looks INCREDIBLY pathetic.
He is wasting jet fuel and money on staff and travel time. Could claim it was greener and less risky in terms of spreading the virus around.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd_-Hi51ydg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZisVdMXRXFQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TS7l4MS73Qc
Can ANYBODY think of ANY REASON he is doing this? Because as a person involved with marketing for the last 30 years I cannot.
It only has downside as far as I can make out.
He has to campaign. Then when they steal the election via "mail in" ballots, his handlers will claim it was a valid elections, etc... Same reason why they are rigging the polls to show Biden way ahead.
The only thing I can think is: a combination of loss of reason brought on by evil, and that they are so set in there old ways. That is the formula they have always used; and they are not capable of thinking outside the box.
There seems to be a King Canute aspect to this as well. The tide has turned and they are doing everything they can to hold it back. It is driving them slowly into madness.
(https://i0.wp.com/morseandlewisandendeavour.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/whom-the-gods-would-destroy-they-first-make-mad-quote-1.jpg?ssl=1)
Quote from: james03 on October 13, 2020, 02:45:00 PM
He has to campaign. Then when they steal the election via "mail in" ballots, his handlers will claim it was a valid elections, etc... Same reason why they are rigging the polls to show Biden way ahead.
He could campaign very effectively on-line. Everyone has a smartphone.
The videos of him campaigning to a dozen cars or people in white circles look really pathetic and weak.
I find it difficult to believe that that many "mail in" ballots can be faked. It would be extremely difficult to do and get away with fraud on that scale. Even in Minnesota where you have a Somalian bunch of people who are 99% Democrat supporting and corrupt as hell you get a whistleblower.
You know what big complex projects are like. They go wrong.
Quote from: paul14 on October 13, 2020, 02:47:46 PM
The only thing I can think is: a combination of loss of reason brought on by evil, and that they are so set in there old ways. That is the formula they have always used; and they are not capable of thinking outside the box.
Sure they used that formula, but they are well aware of the power of social media also. And BigTech made a commitment last time they would tilt the pitch even more in their favour. It is hard to believe that Zuckerberg et al are not capable of throwing 50 million at a skilled team of data experts and media producers and offering that to the DNC.
They are not used to campaigning to 8 people. None of them have ever done that.
How about it's all a show?
The globalists have already decided that Trump is the best man to go full NWO after the election, and so the Democrats are just going through the motions, keeping up the appearance of a campaign while knowing full well that the winner has already been decided.
The fuss about rigged ballots and postal votes is to encourage more Trump votes in response.
It is not the appearance of a campaign.
It is the appearance of a former VP travelling 1000 miles by air to speak a prepared dull speech to 12 people. It heightens the risk of Biden getting the virus and it looks completely pathetic. If the DNC lose again they are completely discredited after all their leading in the polls bullshit twice in a row.
Look at the comments and down votes. Those rallies are pure fodder the make it easy for Trump supporters to mock Biden
Yeah, today CBC has been airing a piece about Trump back on the campaign trail, which flips to Biden speaking to a group of about 20 sitting in their cars. Meanwhile that live video you posted said they were getting more Trump supporters out than they were in 2016. And the media is still trying to make us believe that Biden is ahead in the polls. Looks like it might be a sequel to 2016.
As you yourself say, it makes Biden look pathetic and makes it easy for Trump supporters to mock him.
Which would be the whole idea if Trump has already been chosen for the job of rolling out the NWO after the election. They would naturally want Biden to lose while pretending they didn't to keep up appearances.
Keir Starmer wants a 'circuit breaker' lockdown for the UK. They're all in on it.
You could not pick a more unlikely candidate to roll out the NWO than Trump.
The new Troll order. Absolutely. Top choice.
Biden has to play out the hand (as in poker).
Since women suburban voters have turned against Trump, I am picking Biden to win.
In the electoral college, Biden 300 to Trump's 240.
Biden will be forced out by Pelosi within six months of his election. Then a full on Marxist state will be created.
A world government is created and spearheaded by Francis soon after.
That is all she wrote folks.
So if a Marxist state is created at what point do the non-marxist Constitutionalist start shooting their guns?
Quote from: Greg on October 14, 2020, 04:00:57 PM
So if a Marxist state is created at what point do the non-marxist Constitutionalist start shooting their guns?
non-Marxist constitutionalists are a charade. Do you see any of them in the streets fighting Antifa or BLM? Bunch of fat ass Boomers too scared to tear themselves away from their 60 inch TVs.
Made up by the left to scare white females to vote for Biden. O, o, the big bad violent right wing is coming to get you.
The 19th amendment has finally done its job. The end of freedom in America. I find it very ironic.
90% of all white women in America are unmarriable anyway. They have drank the kool aid of feminism. Time for the great reset.
Good night America!!
Quote from: King Wenceslas on October 14, 2020, 04:40:11 PM
Quote from: Greg on October 14, 2020, 04:00:57 PM
So if a Marxist state is created at what point do the non-marxist Constitutionalist start shooting their guns?
non-Marxist constitutionalists are a charade. Do you see any of them in the streets fighting Antifa or BLM? Bunch of fat ass Boomers too scared to tear themselves away from their 60 inch TVs.
Made up by the left to scare white females to vote for Biden. O, o, the big bad violent right wing is coming to get you.
The 19th amendment has finally done its job. The end of freedom in America. I find it very ironic.
90% of all white women in America are unmarriable anyway. They have drank the kool aid of feminism. Time for the great reset.
Good night America!!
Street fighting with Leftists is stupid no matter how satisfying the thought may be.
We would lower ourselves to their level and look equally bad, right now only the Left is making a heel of themselves. When your enemy is doing something counter-productive do not stop him --The Art of War--.
Also, when one wields overwhelming force they have to be more reserved in its use. For example, if you carry a gun you limit yourself to only deadly encounters, and have to weigh each potential confrontation on the
"is this worth possibly having to kill somebody?" scale. If the confrontation does not necessitate ending somebody's life it has to avoided or walked away from. The same thing goes with the Left. There's no way I'm going to go out and start street-fighting like a Thug, and as infuriating as these Leftists are, presently it would be a severe wrong to go out and start shooting them, both morally and practically. Ideally we convert as many of these Leftists as possible while battling them with organized non-violent resistance of our own and keep the militias in reserve to respond to crisis that merit their level of force. By not getting bogged down in a tit-for-tat against a bunch of brainwashed kids and mentally ill people you remain unburdened and neutral and in a position to rise to vanguard within the Left itself depending on the makeup of the opposition. The higher your enemy is in relation to the social and economic hierarchies the more credibility you have. Just imagine, one group would be fighting Leftists while another taking the fight to the entrenched corporate revolutionary technocrats, who would have more credibility? Not the idiot rolling around in broken glass, getting pepper sprayed in the street, fighting with punks.
As of about a month ago, AmCon is over 50,000 members and Glover can't keep up with the background checks.
The police are neutered and anyone who stands up to Antifa and BLM will be arrested.
QuoteAmerican diplomat George Messerschmidt found himself in an awkward situation while attending a luncheon in Kiel, Germany in August of 1933.
As lunch came to a close, the attendees erupted into song with arms outstretched in the Nazi salute.
First they belted out Germany's national anthem, followed by the anthem of the Stormtroopers– the paramilitary "Brownshirts" who violently enforced Germany's new social rules.
Messerschmidt was the US Consul-General overseeing America's diplomatic ties with Germany, so he politely stood at attention. But he did not salute or sing along.
Germans were required by law to render the Nazi salute, especially during the anthem; Hitler had been awarded supreme executive authority only a few months before, and he made the mandatory salute law of the land.
Foreigners, however, were explicitly exempt from saluting or singing the anthem.
But that didn't help Messerschmidt.
Even though he was legally excused from making the Nazi salute, angry Brownshirts menacingly glared at him for not participating in their rituals.
Messerschidt later wrote in his memoirs that he felt threatened, as if the Brownshirts were ready to attack him.
"I felt really quite fortunate that the incident took place within doors. . . For if it had been in a street gathering, or in an outdoor demonstration, no questions would have been asked as to who I was, and that I would have been mishandled is almost unquestionable."
Messerchmidt was one of the few US officials who grasped just how dangerous the Nazis were in 1933. Others had to witness it first hand before they understood.
A similar event unfolded when a US radio host and his family found themselves amidst an impromptu Nazi parade in Berlin.
And in order to avoid Hailing Hitler, they turned their backs to the parade and gazed into a store window.
But several Brownshirts quickly surrounded the family and demanded to know why they did not salute.
The family explained that they were from the US and didn't know the customs in Germany. But the Brownshirts didn't care. The family was assaulted as police officers watched... and did nothing to stop the violence.
News of these sorts of incidents quickly made their way overseas, and foreigners read the about Americans traveling in Germany being savagely beaten or threatened for not engaging in Nazi rituals.
But more surprising is that many foreigners actually sided with the Nazis.
Even the daughter of the US Ambassador to Germany defended the Nazis and their Brownshirt enforcers.
She said that news reports of these assaults and beatings were "exaggerated by bitter, close-minded people" who ignored the "thrilling rebirth" Hitler had ushered in for Germany (The Stockholm syndrome starts very quickly as we see happening in this country).
Of course, we know in retrospect that these early warning signs were not at all an exaggeration. They were a small preview for what would come next.
Today we are obviously in a different time dealing with totally different circumstances (really?).
But it would be foolish to ignore the early warning signs and pretend as if what's happening now is not a preview for what could come next.
This is perhaps best illustrated by a CNN reporter in Kenosha, Wisconsin back in August who stood in front of burning cars and buildings, with a violent mob all around him, yet declared the protests "fiery but mostly peaceful."
This willful ignorance of the undercurrent coursing its way through the Western world will not save anyone from the destruction it brings.
For example, just this past Monday, "peaceful protesters" in Portland, Oregon celebrated Columbus Day with an "Indigenous People's Day of Rage."
They weren't even pretending to be peaceful. They called it what it is: RAGE. That's literally the name they gave to their own actions.
Hundreds of people dressed in all black, covered their faces, and armed themselves with shields and nightsticks. They marched their way through the city, smashed windows, and forced any witnesses to stop filming and delete photographs.
A man who filmed from his apartment's terrace had lasers shined in his eyes and was doused in some sort of liquid.
The protesters tore down statues of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. They smashed the windows of the Oregon Historical Society building, and unfurled a banner that said "stop honoring racist colonizer murderers."
Police did not even attempt to intervene until the rioters had been on the streets for hours and had already caused havoc and destruction.
(Ironically, much of the mainstream media still refuses to acknowledge that this group 'antifa'– the fascists who call themselves anti-fascists– even exists.)
It's obvious that a small, fringe, ideological minority has started to take control.
They have squashed civil discourse and free speech. Dissent is met with violence and intimidation. And if you dare to speak out, you become a target.
That could mean being "cancelled" by the Twitter mob. Or being accosted in public and forced to raise your fist. Several people have already been killed in protests across the nation.
When people like the former CEO of Twitter are calling for capitalists to be "lined up against the wall and shot," it's time to take the threat seriously.
This is far from the first time in history that a tiny fraction of the population has resorted to violence and extremism to force their agenda on an entire nation.
The black shirts are coming and nobody is there to stop them.
Quote from: King Wenceslas on October 14, 2020, 06:06:42 PM
The police are neutered and anyone who stands up to Antifa and BLM will be arrested.
:lol: By the neutered Police?
Quote from: dellery on October 14, 2020, 06:16:53 PM
Quote from: King Wenceslas on October 14, 2020, 06:06:42 PM
The police are neutered and anyone who stands up to Antifa and BLM will be arrested.
:lol: By the neutered Police?
The protesters tore down statues of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. They smashed the windows of the Oregon Historical Society building, and unfurled a banner that said "stop honoring racist colonizer murderers."
Police did not even attempt to intervene until the rioters had been on the streets for hours and had already caused havoc and destruction. :lol:
Quote from: King Wenceslas on October 14, 2020, 06:22:56 PM
Quote from: dellery on October 14, 2020, 06:16:53 PM
Quote from: King Wenceslas on October 14, 2020, 06:06:42 PM
The police are neutered and anyone who stands up to Antifa and BLM will be arrested.
:lol: By the neutered Police?
The protesters tore down statues of Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln. They smashed the windows of the Oregon Historical Society building, and unfurled a banner that said "stop honoring racist colonizer murderers."
Police did not even attempt to intervene until the rioters had been on the streets for hours and had already caused havoc and destruction. :lol:
The Police did good. Let them Lefties tear down those statues, it'll be like coals on their head. We're taking the Salvadoran path and the first step is allowing the Left to show all the ostriches exactly who they are.
Meanwhile ...
(https://media.thedonald.win/post/fuTfBGSM.jpeg)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqS4m-8B4IQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ef1WbLvZmEE
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXmxE1oTxk8&t=32s[/yt]
Will this breaking news story cause Biden to be replaced by the swamp?
Quote from: Frank on October 15, 2020, 08:07:10 AM
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXmxE1oTxk8&t=32s[/yt]
Will this breaking news story cause Biden to be replaced by the swamp?
If it does then I know somebody who will win a shitload of money.
[yt]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNuzgDrUXP0[/yt]
If he is replaced he wins less on the bet.
He is hedged against a Biden win of less than 100 ECVs, if Biden is replaced he just gets the stake back.
They won't replace Biden. There is no way to do that without massive damage. They are pot committed.
The next release is Hunter Biden's sex tape, with him fornicating with a prostitute whilst smoking crack. Like the good Catholic Boy he is.
That will draw the attention of millions of eyeballs all over the world and spark 10,000 memes. I think enough people will be so disgusted that they might secretly switch votes to Trump or a 3rd Party Candidate or just not vote at all. Does not take much and the battleground states are pretty conservative. I cannot see Mormons and notional Christians being happy with a drug taking whoremonger passing half of his income to his father.
This is blowing up over LinkedIn and the blogs and YouTube. In 24-48 hours the MSM will have to cover it.
This can't be Antifa, they're just an idea, remember...?
Quote from: Greg on October 15, 2020, 09:23:28 AM
If he is replaced he wins less on the bet.
He is hedged against a Biden win of less than 100 ECVs, if Biden is replaced he just gets the stake back.
No, he bet NOT biden. That means if Biden does not run he wins regardless of who wins.
from the rules:
If any candidate withdraws for any reason, including death, all bets on the market will stand and be settled as per the defined rules (Updated - 20/06/2020)note: he is also hedged though, and it is true that the hedge would not pay, and that he would get his stake back for the hedge.
The odds on NOT Biden are currently 2/1.
I get it.
QuoteWe're taking the Salvadoran path
Care to elaborate?
Here's the problem that gives Biden a shot:
In the past, Ohio decided the election. Ohio is solid Trump. However,
Due to demographics and the migration of Californicators, we lost Colorado and Virginia. So Ohio is now a must win. I'm also assuming Trump wins Florida. Not a done deal due to demographics.
Also, I'm assuming Arizona goes Trump, and that is very iffy due to recent election results.
So the election comes down to Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. All run by Dem governors. So cheating is very doable.
Ignoring cheating, a Trump win would include Florida, Arizona, and Wisconsin. If he loses Florida, Biden wins. If he loses one of the other two, he would need to backfill with Michigan or Pennsylvania.
Wisconsin is the whitest at over 80%. Arizona is down to 54% white.
This Hunter Biden story is getting a lot of attention and the laptop emails look genuine. Soon that sex-video will be leaked.
Now it looks like Ukraine was the tip of the iceberg and he got $10m from China for introducing people to his father.
The question is how many people will conclude Biden is completely corrupt and stay away from the polls, figuring that 4 more years of Trump is not that bad.
Do most people truly give a shit about a virus that is killing 0.2% of the people it infects and then only old people? I think many people will want to just get on with their lives and see their businesses start earning again, travel for business again and there is no chance of that with Biden in charge.
The self-appointed Opinionators and out-of-touch pollsters forget how important visuals are. Here's vigorous Trump, rapidly recovered from a widely exaggerated virus, confidently greeting crowds, while there's Biden, masked as if he's ultra-susceptible to infection, limping along to greet no crowds or thin crowds, living in a cocoon even when out in public. One candidate looks vigorous and ready for the job; the other looks weakened, sickly (mask-protected), and not up to the job at all, even without the many signs of cognitive decline.
Sex tape already leaking. OANN reporter stated she saw it. Makes Weiner look mild in comparison.
Quote from: james03 on October 15, 2020, 12:57:23 PM
QuoteWe're taking the Salvadoran path
Care to elaborate?
I've talked about it before on here a while ago, but resistance to a revolution has to come from the people themselves, and not the force of the state.
The people the state is trying to protect, and maintain order for, will criticize the state for excessive force when it confronts a non-violent (grey area of escalation) revolution. So the people need to be enabled to protect, and maintain order, themselves.
Counterrevolution needs to be an expression of the popular will. The people need to be empowered to reject the revolution because the government can not reject it for them. We learned this is El Salvador, hence the name.
So this is why the Police are, and should be, taking a step back and allowing these Leftists to let loose and destroy. It's been studied that in a large number people the more you attack their beliefs the stronger they hold on to them. Leftist terror not only exposes the Left for what it truly is, but also solidifies the underlying beliefs that inform people against it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Option