Pandemic was predicted/ Hegel's Dialectic at work

Started by TradGranny, May 17, 2021, 01:58:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TradGranny

"In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval" — Clade X pandemic simulation (May, 2018)

to read with hyperlinks and videos see:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/timeline-great-reset-agenda-foundation-event-201-pandemic-2020/5745205


A Timeline of "The Great Reset" Agenda

Say it's 2014 and you've had this idea for a technocratic Great Reset of the world economy for some time now, but it only works if the entire planet is rocked by a pandemic. How do you go about selling your idea?

"The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future" — Klaus Schwab, WEF

If you are World Economic Forum (WEF) Founder Klaus Schwab, you attempt to sell your vision of a global Utopia via a Great Reset of the world order in three simple steps:

    Announce your intention to revamp every aspect of society with global governance, and keep repeating that message
    When your message isn't getting through, simulate fake pandemic scenarios that show why the world needs a great reset
    If the fake pandemic scenarios aren't persuasive enough, wait a couple months for a real global crisis to occur, and repeat step one

It took Schwab and the Davos elite about six years to watch their great reset ideology grow from a tiny Swiss seed in 2014 to a European super-flower pollinating the entire globe in 2020.

The so-called "Great Reset" promises to build "a more secure, more equal, and more stable world" if everyone on the planet agrees to "act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions."

But it wouldn't have been possible to contemplate materializing such an all-encompassing plan for a new world order without a global crisis, be it manufactured or of unfortunate happenstance, that shocked society to its core.

"In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval" — Clade X pandemic simulation (May, 2018)

So, in May, 2018, the WEF partnered with Johns Hopkins to simulate a fictitious pandemic — dubbed "Clade X" —  to see how prepared the world be if ever faced with such a crisis.

A little over a year later, the WEF once again teamed-up with Johns Hopkins, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to stage another pandemic exercise called Event 201 in October, 2019.

Both simulations concluded that the world wasn't prepared for a global pandemic.

And a few short months following the conclusion of Event 201, which specifically simulated a coronavirus outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially declared that the coronavirus had reached pandemic status on March 11, 2020.

"The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering" — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)

Since then, just about every scenario covered in the Clade X and Event 201 simulations has come into play, including:

    Governments implementing lockdowns worldwide
    The collapse of many industries
    Growing mistrust between governments and citizens
    A greater adoption of biometric surveillance technologies
    Social media censorship in the name of combating misinformation

    The desire to flood communication channels with "authoritative" sources
    A global lack of personal protective equipment
    The breakdown of international supply chains
    Mass unemployment
    Rioting in the streets

    And a whole lot more!

After the nightmare scenarios had fully materialized by mid-2020, the WEF founder declared "now is the time for a "Great Reset" in June of this year.

Was it excellent forecasting, planning, and modeling on the part of the WEF and partners that Clade X and Event 201 turned out to be so prophetic, or was there something more to it?
Timeline

Below is a condensed timeline of events that tracks the Great Reset agenda that went from just a "hope" in 2014 to a globalist ideology touted by royalty, the media, and heads of state the world-over in 2020.

2014-2017: Klaus Schwab calls for Great Reset and WEF repeats message

Ahead of the 2014 WEF meeting in Davos, Switzerland, Schwab announced that he hoped the WEF would push the reset button on the global economy.

The WEF would go on to repeat that message for years.

Between 2014 and 2017, the WEF called to reshape, restart, reboot, and reset the global order every single year, each aimed at solving various "crises."

    2014: WEF publishes meeting agenda entitled "The Reshaping of the World: Consequences for Society, Politics and Business."
    2015: WEF publishes article in collaboration with VOX EU called "We need to press restart on the global economy."

    2016: WEF holds panel called "How to reboot the global economy."

    2017: WEF publishes article saying "Our world needs a reset in how we operate."

Then in 2018, the Davos elites turned their heads towards simulating fake pandemic scenarios to see how prepared the world would be in the face of a different crisis.

2018-2019: WEF, Johns Hopkins & Gates Foundation simulate fake pandemics

On May 15, 2018, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted the "Clade X" pandemic exercise in partnership with the WEF.

The Clade X exercise included mock video footage of actors giving scripted news reports about a fake pandemic scenario (video below).

The Clade X event also included discussion panels with real policymakers who assessed that governments and industry were not adequately prepared for the fictitious global pandemic.

"In the end, the outcome was tragic: the most catastrophic pandemic in history with hundreds of millions of deaths, economic collapse and societal upheaval," according to a WEF report on Clade X.

"There are major unmet global vulnerabilities and international system challenges posed by pandemics that will require new robust forms of public-private cooperation to address" — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)

Then on October 18, 2019, in partnership with Johns Hopkins and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WEF ran Event 201.

During the scenario, the entire global economy was shaken, there were riots on the streets, and high-tech surveillance measures were needed to "stop the spread."

Two fake pandemics were simulated in the two years leading up to the real coronavirus crisis.

"Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation" — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)

The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security issued a public statement on January 24, 2020, explicitly addressing that Event 201 wasn't meant to predict the future.

"To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction. Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic."

Intentional or not, Event 201 "highlighted" the "fictional" challenges of a pandemic, along with recommendations that go hand-in-hand with the great reset agenda that has set up camp in the nefarious "new normal."

"The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering" — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)

Together, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation submitted seven recommendations for governments, international organizations, and global business to follow in the event of a pandemic.

The Event 201 recommendations call for greater collaboration between the public and private sectors while emphasizing the importance of establishing partnerships with un-elected, global institutions such as the WHO, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the International Air Transport Organization, to carry out a centralized response.

One of the recommendations calls for governments to partner with social media companies and news organization to censor content and control the flow of information.

"Media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though [sic] the use of technology" — Event 201 pandemic simulation (October, 2019)

According to the report, "Governments will need to partner with traditional and social media companies to research and develop nimble approaches to countering misinformation.

"National public health agencies should work in close collaboration with WHO to create the capability to rapidly develop and release consistent health messages.

"For their part, media companies should commit to ensuring that authoritative messages are prioritized and that false messages are suppressed including though [sic] the use of technology."

Sound familiar?

Throughout 2020, Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube have been censoring, suppressing, and flagging any coronavirus-related information that goes against WHO recommendations as a matter of policy, just as Event 201 had recommended.

Big tech companies have also deployed the same content suppression tactics during the 2020 US presidential election — slapping "disputed" claims on content that question election integrity.

2020: WEF declares 'Now is the time for a Great Reset'

After calling for a great reset in 2014, the Davos crowd repeated the same ideology for a few more years before pivoting towards simulating faux pandemic scenarios.

A few months after the WEF established that nobody was prepared to deal with a coronavirus pandemic, the WHO declared there was a coronavirus pandemic.

All of a sudden! the great reset narrative that the WEF had been nurturing for six years, found a place to pitch its tent in the "new normal" camp.

"The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future," Schwab declared on June 3, 2020.

And that's where we're at today.

    The Davos elites said they wanted a global reset of the economy many years ago
    They role-played what would happen if a pandemic were to occur
    And now they're saying that the great reset ideology is the solution to the pandemic, and it must be enacted quickly

The great reset is a means to an end.

Next on the agenda is a complete makeover of society under a technocratic regime of un-elected bureaucrats who want to dictate how the world is run from the top down, leveraging invasive technologies to track and trace your every move while censoring and silencing anyone who dares not comply.

for hyperlinks see:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/timeline-great-reset-agenda-foundation-event-201-pandemic-2020/5745205
To have courage for whatever comes in life - everything lies in that.
Saint Teresa of Avila

Insanis

Compared to other revolutionary take overs and restructuring of society, if this was the best they could do, it was pretty pathetic.

It didn't fundamentally change much besides making small business owners more wary and annoying everyone.

At least, this is the case in the USA.

They reset people's holiday plans more than anything.

Also, almost all the actual decisions were made more locally than the WEF or other distant organizations.

My governor isn't a mastermind of anything but his own enrichment and political career.

diaduit

Quote from: Insanis on May 17, 2021, 02:09:35 PM
Compared to other revolutionary take overs and restructuring of society, if this was the best they could do, it was pretty pathetic.

It didn't fundamentally change much besides making small business owners more wary and annoying everyone.

At least, this is the case in the USA.

They reset people's holiday plans more than anything.

Also, almost all the actual decisions were made more locally than the WEF or other distant organizations.

My governor isn't a mastermind of anything but his own enrichment and political career.

You absolutely have no clue.  It changed everything drastically.  Where to start!!

Masks in public places and restrictions on movement such as can't go beyond 5k, neighbours ratting on each other for breach of rules such as kids birthday parties or more than few at a funeral, teenagers with zero social life and horrible school atmosphere constantly being shouted at by teachers and told which direction to walk, where to sit, sanitizing every surface you touch.  Can't get medical attention for love or money over here (28 days after initial email to dr re fathers health and a reminder and a phonecall where I had to shout to get to the dr, I finally got to speak to him on the phone)  severe isolation of the old and the vulnerable, missed serious illness diagnosis due to hospitals closing their doors practically, SUICIDES, SUICIDES and more SUICIDES.  Decimation of small businesses (go to www.daft.ie and check out the business premises for rent and pubs for sale in Ireland), no tourism industry, lost most of my friends because they don't want to be around someone who doesn't buy into the covid crap,  MASSES ILLEGAL IN IRELAND WHEN LOCKDOWN IN PLACE, we have had 3 lockdowns and last one was 5 months, son can't apply for his drivers licence or get driving lessons, our confirmations have been cancelled as we have a strict two week quarantine in place so the Bishop can't come and so many other ways this has affected us tremendously......

You must be living under a rock, in Spain they have curfew, in France its masks for primary school children all day, in the UK they were allowed out for one hour a day max.

Now I know by and large most people broke some restrictions on some level but most people kept the restrictions mostly on nearly all levels.  I know far too many peers my age who haven't seen their elderly parents in months.  In Europe, we are suffering big time with this, you have no idea.  Do you have teenagers, do you have elderly, do you have friends whom you cannot see? because I cannot understand how you can say it was pathetic, it has been devastating to most of Europe and large swathes of other countries too.  We are on the brink of a complete breakdown of the current system as we know it so it has been very successful.


james03

QuoteCompared to other revolutionary take overs and restructuring of society, if this was the best they could do, it was pretty pathetic.

They took out Trump, which was the goal.  Now China is back in control, illegals are flooding into the US, and US troops are back in Syria.  Looks like a home run to me for only 5 months.  Check back in 2 years from now.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"

Insanis

Quote from: diaduit on May 17, 2021, 02:30:20 PM
You absolutely have no clue.  It changed everything drastically.  Where to start!!

I suppose it depends on the scale one is using what is "drastic".



Quote
Masks in public places...

You must be living under a rock, in Spain they have curfew, in France its masks for primary school children all day, in the UK they were allowed out for one hour a day max.

...

In Europe, we are suffering big time with this, you have no idea.  Do you have teenagers, do you have elderly, do you have friends whom you cannot see? because I cannot understand how you can say it was pathetic, it has been devastating to most of Europe and large swathes of other countries too.  We are on the brink of a complete breakdown of the current system as we know it so it has been very successful.

I'm sorry to hear about your woes, but my statement was qualified by:

Quote from: MeAt least, this is the case in the USA.

Taking a quote out and ignoring that, and then saying I have "no clue" is not honest.

You even quoted me in full for some reason.

If I am talking about the conditions here in the USA, and you bring up Ireland, UK, and Europe, do you think that makes any sense?

If I say the weather is getting warm where I live, and some Canadian says they had freezing temperatures yesterday, does that contradict what I wrote?

Now, if I said nobody was drastically effected anywhere or that the weather is warm everywhere, that would be false.

But I didn't say that.

As for those restrictions: where I am, in my state, which is what had the power to implement the mitigation orders and enforce them for me, we didn't have the measures you described to that degree, except for people in certain industries.

Insanis

Quote from: james03 on May 17, 2021, 02:39:44 PM
QuoteCompared to other revolutionary take overs and restructuring of society, if this was the best they could do, it was pretty pathetic.

They took out Trump, which was the goal.

They took him out by waiting for his term to be over and holding an ordinary election.

This is like a person about to be executed saying their last request is to be executed by "old age".

james03

QuoteThey took him out by waiting for his term to be over and holding an ordinary election.
We never had mail in ballots like we did in 2020.  So you are already wrong on "ordinary".  The there was the first-time-ever halting of counting, which coincidently was in swing States: Georgia, PA, WS, MI, and AZ.  When the halt occurred, Trump was up big.  When the restart happened, Biden gets all the votes.  And of course we are told the Georgia count was stopped due to a water main leak.  Which didn't happen.

And then there is the logical evidence.  Biden getting an insane amount of votes, beating Obama by a large margin, despite a large contingent of the Left rebelling against the Dems because they hate Biden and Kamala, and the absolute pathetic rallies Biden had.

All of this has been presented.  For me, you just have to tell me they shut down counting when Trump was winning by a landslide, and I don't need anymore details.  Others can believe what they want.  However, luckily we finally got what we wanted, an audit for one voter district in Arizona.  If it is close to reported, I'll concede.  If it shows huge fraud, will the doubters also concede and admit the election was stolen?  No, because that would mean admitting you were taken in for a sucker, and pride won't allow it.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"

Insanis

Quote from: james03 on May 17, 2021, 06:27:28 PM
No, because that would mean admitting you were taken in for a sucker, and pride won't allow it.

I consider every election corrupted and pointless most of the time. It is manipulated and set up by the two Parties which jointly share power and cooperate to maintain this shared power.

The electoral college votes for the president, not the people, and their votes were clear.

The rest is just theatre.

To play or care about federal politics, one has to associate with a Party, and simply put, I don't do that.

The politicians are flexible with their views. It is very public: look at Trump and Biden. They both align themselves with something to get where they are. They aren't following their own beliefs other than they are willing to align themselves with one of the structures which they need the blessing of.

Trump pretended to care about things he doesn't, and Biden aligned core moral beliefs to fit the required role.

In short, whatever ballots were cast, it was already decided, either way, every time.

Tennessean

#8
Who was plotting against Trump's reelection? How does that work when the whole world practically shut down? Faucci was his man, all this transpired under Trump and with his authorization under Nat'l Emergency/Stafford/Public Health Service Acts. Hillary could never have done it, so they hired an actor to play a maverick populist. Demographics cost the election, fraud can' account for the change that's been going on over multiple generations now.

james03

No, this was more corrupt than ever.  As I said, we finally got the audit we wanted, almost 6 months after the election.  I'm open to the outcome as it appears to be very transparent including live stream cameras.  If it comes in close (I know that no audit comes in and matches exactly), I'll concede.  If they uncover a pile of ballots missing the UV watermark, and they are all for Biden, then we'll know conclusively that Biden is not legit.

And I refuse to be gas lighted on the "water main break" at the Georgia counting center.  Let's approach this rationally.  Suppose you are Fed law enforcement.  You discover this bogus story.  What is your first move?  You grab the guy that issued the press release and indict him for elections tampering.  Then you get him to squeal up the chain of command.  Didn't happen.  Corrupt as heck.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"

Tennessean

Demographics don't lie. If he wasn't the last token right winger president in 2020, he would be in 2024. The country's been changing for many years, the south especially. With more boomers croaking, it'll speed up the leftward swing.

james03

"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"

james03

QuoteDemographics don't lie. If he wasn't the last token right winger president in 2020, he would be in 2024. The country's been changing for many years, the south especially. With more boomers croaking, it'll speed up the leftward swing.
Totally agree.  I'm just salty because Trump was going to buy us 4 more years to prepare.  I fully expected the dems to take over in 2024.  Now I'm behind the eight ball in my preps.  The inflation alone is going to cost me big in building my survival redoubt. 

QuoteWho was plotting against Trump's reelection? How does that work when the whole world practically shut down? Faucci was his man, all this transpired under Trump
Likely the jews who wanted Syria.  Plus a lot of felons in the State Department and Department of Justice who risked being indicted.  But yeah they were plotting against Trump.  Look at Barr.  Had a chip shot tee'd up for him with Clinesmith.  When he sat on indicting him, then agreed to a plea agreement, no jail time, AND NO COOPERATION AGREEMENT, that broke my heart.  Even Barr was dirty.  Clinesmith is a soft little weasel that would have squealed.  That one hurt.

Quoteso they hired an actor to play a maverick populist.
I actually subscribe to something like this.  Trump was either played, blackmailed, or was a fraud.  Since he ordered the troops out of Syria and refused to start a war with Iran, I don't think he was a fraud.  I think he was owned and negotiated to a stale mate.  Mutually Assured Destruction.  The jews go a lot of goodies in Israel, and a defense agreement, and Trump got a few wins like tariffs and part of his wall.  They knew he'd be gone in 2020, so they were patient.

The blackmail would have been Ivanka, set up by Jared.  Or his weird daughter Tiffany.  Or Trump was stabbed in the back.  I think he was blackmailed because of his pardons of the spy (((Pollock))) and that high ranking dude in the jewish mafia.  Zero argument for clemency for that dude.  And Assange, who has the goods on everyone, no pardon.  Strange crap going on in the Trump admin, but my bet is on blackmail.  Maybe he did ride around with Epstein or something.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"

King Wenceslas

#13
Quote from: Insanis on May 17, 2021, 02:09:35 PM
Compared to other revolutionary take overs and restructuring of society, if this was the best they could do, it was pretty pathetic.

It didn't fundamentally change much besides making small business owners more wary and annoying everyone.

At least, this is the case in the USA.

They reset people's holiday plans more than anything.

Also, almost all the actual decisions were made more locally than the WEF or other distant organizations.

My governor isn't a mastermind of anything but his own enrichment and political career.

Tell that to the 15,000 old people that died in Cuomo's death camps called nursing homes. It changed them from living to DEAD. By the stroke of a pen Cuomo forced covid patients from the hospitals into those nursing homes.

Cuomo and Mengele are of the same pedigree. Just like 9/11, Covid has changed this country forever. Travel plans indeed!!

Insanis

#14
Quote from: King Wenceslas on May 17, 2021, 08:50:08 PM
Tell that to the 15,000 old people that died in Cuomo's death camps called nursing homes. It changed them from living to DEAD. By the stroke of a pen Cuomo forced covid patients from the hospitals into those nursing homes.

Cuomo and Mengele are of the same pedigree. Just like 9/11, Covid has changed this country forever. Travel plans indeed!!

Tom Wolf too.

However, I am talking about the general society, not nursing homes and hospices.

Also, the fact that people died of this disease are largely people who were vulnerable to almost every disease and which were at the end of their lives just shows my point. Compare this to the virus that killed people in 1918, called the Spanish Flu (in the USA). It killed across demographics, not to mention it was occurring during a horrific war full of young men drafted to fight and die for almost no gains or losses in actual terrain gained or lost.

That was upheaval.

Old sick people dying, unjustly or not, doesn't shake society.

Everybody dies: just look at the CDC statistics. It is a massacre of epic proportions every year in the USA from lifestyle, yet, we tolerate that, even though it affects the population at every age and is a national security issue (reduces the already low number of eligible young people fit enough to protect the nation).

So I stand by my assessment for the area around me.