In gambling, ultimately, the house always wins/comes out ahead. In usury, the lender always has and retains the upper hand, because the issuance of new money devalues the money received, making it more difficult for the borrower to one, make use of the loan, and two repay the loan, and three get ahead in any ways shape or form as a result. The borrower always loses.
Wrong. With inflation, lenders lose. I am a proud debtor because loans have greatly benefitted me.
Lenders never loan out money without collateral.
Wrong again and that's irrelevant because I didn't mention collateral.
Good luck convincing anyone on this forum that your wealth is benefitting you.
"And every one that heareth these my words, and doth them not, shall be
like a foolish man that built his house upon the sand." Now that society has become totally corrupted, and all the markets in the hands of the bankers, sure they can lend out money at low interest to judaics/masons like yourself and in the short term lose academically. But, I am not arguing from a modern point of societal failure/a foundation of sand. Usury in its basic form always has collateral, and its issuance at the very least slowly but surely results in defaults on the loan. When it doesn't the money generated is always funneled into vicious ventures.