[POLL] Which Easter Triduum Rite did you attend?

[Michael Wilson]

The Tradi in me says: "Only the pre-1955" service; the slothful me says: "1962 all the way" 

[Bonaventure]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

[AlfredtheGreat]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

[Bonaventure]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

[LausTibiChriste]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

You're a moderator - shouldn't you follow your own rules?

I know sedes are hell bent on disobeying everyone but themselves, but does that really have to apply to your moderation?

[Bonaventure]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

You're a moderator - shouldn't you follow your own rules?

I know sedes are hell bent on disobeying everyone but themselves, but does that really have to apply to your moderation?

I may be sede but I am more of a "kung fu" sede. If that makes sense.

[LausTibiChriste]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

You're a moderator - shouldn't you follow your own rules?

I know sedes are hell bent on disobeying everyone but themselves, but does that really have to apply to your moderation?

I may be sede but I am more of a "kung fu" sede. If that makes sense.

That's fine, I'm kung fu too in a lot of things - kind of have to be in this day and age, given the situation we're in. At least with the Faith.

But why set a rule book for the forum if moderation won't follow it?

[Bonaventure]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

You're a moderator - shouldn't you follow your own rules?

I know sedes are hell bent on disobeying everyone but themselves, but does that really have to apply to your moderation?

I may be sede but I am more of a "kung fu" sede. If that makes sense.

That's fine, I'm kung fu too in a lot of things - kind of have to be in this day and age, given the situation we're in. At least with the Faith.

But why set a rule book for the forum if moderation won't follow it?

I've been necromancing threads because I have found it to be useful to catch users who have signed up for multiple accounts.

They tend to take the bait.

Kind of like this. I'm prepared to go all the way to remove these vermin from the forum.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=xPZ6eaL3S2E&si=tyH50jH1FxQNmCgq

[Michael Wilson]

I saw this posted on a sede site criticizing those sedes that reject Pope Pius XII's post 1955 Holy Week Services. Pretty much saying, that rejecting the liturgical legislation of a Pope is a schismatic act.
I remember asking a sede priest about the fact that the group he was with didn't use the 1955 Missal; and how to explain this in conformity with their claim that Pius XII was a true Pope? He kind of shrugged his shoulders; but latter I read that he had left the group and was associated with the SSPX (at least for a time).
Unfortunately the "right click" has been disabled and I cannot copy and paste the article here, but I highly recommend everyone to read it, as it is not very long and it brings out allot of truths of the Catholic doctrine on the infallibility of the liturgical laws of the Church:
https://cmri.org/articles-on-the-traditional-catholic-faith/the-liturgical-changes-of-pope-pius-xii/

Can we refuse the liturgical reforms of Pius XII?
Fr. Dominic Radecki

Bottom line: "NO"

[Michael Wilson]

The Tradi in me says: "Only the pre-1955" service; the slothful me says: "1962 all the way" 

Given the above article I have to amend my response to: "As a tradi, "1958" rites; 1962 I will attend, but with a very disapproving look on my face. 

[awkward customer]

I'm prepared to go all the way to remove these vermin from the forum.

Vermin ......?  You are actually referring to people who have posted here as "vermin"?

Go and have a lie down or examine your motives or something.

You really are showing yourself up.

[Bonaventure]

I'm prepared to go all the way to remove these vermin from the forum.

Vermin ......?  You are actually referring to people who have posted here as "vermin"?

Go and have a lie down or examine your motives or something.

You really are showing yourself up.

Yeah, the ones you and your gal pal complained about and reported in your sede debates.

Perhaps I should've used...how did you phrase it...

"Obnoxious little prat" or "little man"

That is a term that should be acceptable to you.

[Greg]

I assisted at the pre-1955* as offered by the ICKSP. 

*They sadly used the Benedict XVI Good Friday prayer, as opposed to the traditional one.  Alas.

Full communion cuckoldry.

One could argue that the ICRSS uses the 2008 Holy Week, then. 

So when are you going to ban yourself for transgressing the clearly stated forum rule about bumping threads more than 120 days old, Bonnie?

If you want my lynching, ask @Kaesekopf

You're a moderator - shouldn't you follow your own rules?

I know sedes are hell bent on disobeying everyone but themselves, but does that really have to apply to your moderation?

I may be sede but I am more of a "kung fu" sede. If that makes sense.

That's fine, I'm kung fu too in a lot of things - kind of have to be in this day and age, given the situation we're in. At least with the Faith.

But why set a rule book for the forum if moderation won't follow it?

I've been necromancing threads because I have found it to be useful to catch users who have signed up for multiple accounts.

They tend to take the bait.

Kind of like this. I'm prepared to go all the way to remove these vermin from the forum.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=xPZ6eaL3S2E&si=tyH50jH1FxQNmCgq

I don't mind.  At least you are necromancing interesting ones.