Letter To Priests And Faithful, Father Joseph Pfeiffer

Started by Gottmitunsalex, March 11, 2013, 08:36:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Gottmitunsalex


LETTER TO PRIESTS AND FAITHFUL
FATHER JOSEPH PFEIFFER

Dear XXXX,

In order to justify before God, your staying quietly in the SSPX mainstream you must be  able to agree with each of the numbered statements at least "essentially." If you see that any ONE of them is a danger to souls, then you are obliged before God to speak out and to act.

1. The General Chapter official unretracted declaration of July 14, 2012 with its absence of the teaching of the 2 Magisteria and its presence of 6 conditions as well as its ambiguous language regarding the meaning of Tradition both is not a danger to the Faith of Souls and will not lead souls down the slippery path of Modernism.

If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

2. The General Chapter's official "determined and approved" "the SSPX bind herself" acceptance of the placing ourselves under Modernist Rome's Authority is not a danger to the Faith of our Sheep and will not lead souls down the slippery path of Modernism.
If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

3.The Superior General's March 18 Cor Unum directive to "change our attitude towards Rome," to  no longer have "the Bulldozer approach"  to be open to a deal with Rome as long as Rome 1. allows us to have the 1962 liturgy and 2. allows us to "operate with a certain real freedom in concrete circumstances" is not a principle of compromise and not a danger to the Faith of our SSPX priests or laity and will not lead souls down the slippery path of Modernism.
If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

4.The SSPX new "positive approach" to neo-modernist Rome does not endanger souls into falling into the modernism of the "neo-conservatives" such as FSSP, Institute of Christ the King, the Sons of the Redeemer, Micheal Voris etc.

If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

5. The SSPX posting in its official communications (SSPX.org and DICI.org) stories from Rome, articles from Neo-cons intermixed with similar SSPX authors, without correction or commentary about what is erroneous, is not a danger to the faith of Souls receiving official SSPX literature and will not lead souls down the slippery path of Modernism..

If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

6. It is a more grave evil against unity and obedience to criticize the Superior General in his "seeming" liberal unretracted, unclarified statements of the May 11 CNS interview, his own DICI interviews, his own directives of March 18 his letter to the Three Bishops of April 14, and July 14, 2012 than to criticize them publicly on the grounds of there being a "grave danger to Faith that leads souls down the slippery path of Modernism." i.e. Unity is greater than Faith.

If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you, as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

7. An SSPX priest is only justified to speak out if and when (not before) that priest is commanded to celebrate the New Mass or is commanded to preach a direct heresy. Anything less can only be criticized or corrected in private and certainly not before the Faithful since they are not being affected negatively until they see the New Mass. i.e. The Doctrine is secondary behind the Traditional Liturgy. If this Statement is True then you must align yourself with the FSSP or any other Novus Ordo appendage of your choice.
If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.

8. The priests and faithful must have trust in their Superiors and should not read or research anything related to the present crisis of the SSPX except from SSPX approved sources, namely SSPX.org and Dici.org. Disobedience is against God in these matters. The Faithful should not study these matters but have confidence in the track record and wisdom of the Superior General and follow his judgment since he was chosen by God and Archbishop Lefebvre and has the grace of state that the priests and faithful don't have. Hence the faithful should simply follow blindly this Superior General Auxiliary Bishop of a Pio Unio who has no jurisdiction over them.
If the above statement is a danger to the Faith of Souls then you as a priest of God must speak out and warn the flock.
St. Bernard says that a priest is a watchdog and a watchdog is useless unless he barks. Where is thy bark. St. Felix II said "to not condemn error is to approve it, to not teach the truth is to condemn it." This statement does not refer to errors presently unknown or untaught, but to the errors of our day, our time, our place. In a world of pagans one does not speak of the errors of Molinism or Monotheletism. Hence, if there are errors in our own SSPX as our own Catholic Church, the same principle demands that the Catholic priest condemn both.

in Christ,

Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer

Attached is an incomplete collection of recent communications from SSPX officialdom, compiled by an SSPX parishioner in the USA.  20 pages of liberal, neo-modernist official texts of the Neo-SSPX. You cannot claim that all is well because you refuse to read, listen or study what is happening in SSPX 2012-13.

Attachment:
http://www.mediafire.com/view/?yljaiql8k2d9k6q
"Nothing is more miserable than those people who never failed to attack their own salvation. When there was need to observe the Law, they trampled it under foot. Now that the Law has ceased to bind, they obstinately strive to observe it. What could be more pitiable that those who provoke God not only by transgressing the Law but also by keeping it? But at any rate the Jews say that they, too, adore God. God forbid that I say that. No Jew adores God! Who say so? The Son of God say so. For he said: "If you were to know my Father, you would also know me. But you neither know me nor do you know my Father". Could I produce a witness more trustworthy than the Son of God?"  St. John Chrysostom  Sunday Homily

"The two goals of the Jews: The universal domination of the world and the destruction of Catholicism, out of hatred for Christ" --Mgr. Jouin