Recent posts

#1

Ask a Traditionalist / Re: Opulence in Restaurant Foo...

Last post by Heinrich - Today at 01:22:25 PM

That was a lovely steak. It is a shame I could not finish it. I think if you had not eaten it I would have got them to box it and eaten it cold.

I am not sure which steak we had.  Below is a list.  Can you remember?

https://www.longhornsteakhouse.com/menu/legendary-steaks-combos/legendary-steaks

I can't believe you remember a steak that you ate 7.5 years ago. That must have been an excellent steak.

No European(or Canadian) ever forgets his trip to the US. It's that special.

#2

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Bonaventure - Today at 12:40:20 PM

Politeness for the sake of keeping the peace can have its drawbacks though, you must admit.   

2 or 3 posts were made in jest, and Baylee said that this place was intolerable, that the owner and I are childish and rude, and that this would be a farewell from the forum.

There have been no moderation sanctions, such as bans, or even formal warnings given.

I can, in jest, post what others do unironically, no?

People often huff and puff, and say they will leave, sometimes add a little uncharitable spice, but end up not doing so.

I've seen that take place more than once.

The Forum Owner and I usually are quite lax and laissez faire with most moderation.

People have said many things to me, such as it being a good thing that my wife miscarried, or a variety of other phraseology, and they have not been banned.

It is no different in this case.

#3

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by awkward customer - Today at 12:13:33 PM

I am not going to stand by and allow one invited into our virtual "house" or "coffee shop" to proceed to call all of my guests who are non-sede as having a position aligned with non-Catholics/enemies of the Church, or to constantly tell people who go to their local parish that all of their sacraments are invalid. It would be bad hospitality on my part, if nothing else.

But Baylee doesn't post her Sede views all over the forum. She just doesn't.  You've given one example.

And I understand that you and KK want Sedism to stay in its own sub-forum because you don't want to put people off SD. But you can both be a bit cavalier at times not to mention upsettingly rude, although that could be because of my own thin skin.

Politeness for the sake of keeping the peace can have its drawbacks though, you must admit.   

#4

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Baylee - Today at 11:34:26 AM

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Sorry MW. This wasn't just a friendly joking around. Clearly, I'm not the kind of sede welcome here. I'm not willing to keep my mouth shut nor to accept rude comments from anyone no matter their position on the forum just to keep the peace.  This was brewing for me for a while now.

Things like the opinion that the NO Rites is invalid is basically a forbidden topic because it offends those who are not thick-skinned around here.  It's just not in the forum rules. If they were honest, they would add it to the forum rules.

#5

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Bonaventure - Today at 11:33:11 AM

I will leave when I decide I'm done.

Ah, so you have no other place to go!

If this place were so intolerable, and I were as uncharitable, rude, and childish as you've claimed, your continued participation here would make you...what was that word you used to describe me...a "hypocrite!"

Last I checked, CathInfo is taking new members. You could always go there, and tell @MatthewCI that his recognize and resist position is aligned with enemies of the Church.

Let's see how long you'd last.

I'd give it...two days.

Otherwise, your continued participation here only weakens your claims.

#6

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Baylee - Today at 11:22:17 AM

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.

I've written plenty of posts not related to Sedevacantism.

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.

"All over the forum". I'd love to see the evidence.   

I've already given the examples.

I called you out and you said "I'm leaving."

That appears to be false.

I will leave when I decide I'm done. 

"examples"? Plural?    I saw one (which was written respectfully).  That doesn't constitute "all over the forum".  Basically, your comment that I do this "all over the forum" is a lie.  Plain and simple.

The truth is you don't like what I've been writing about a lot of things lately (i.e. not just my sede posts) and you (and K) chose to mock it. So charitable of you.     

#7

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Bonaventure - Today at 11:15:29 AM

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.

I've written plenty of posts not related to Sedevacantism.

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.

"All over the forum". I'd love to see the evidence.   

I've already given the examples.

I called you out and you said "I'm leaving."

That appears to be false.

#8

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Baylee - Today at 11:14:22 AM

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.

"All over the forum". I'd love to see the evidence. 

#9

The Sedevacantist Thesis / Re: 1P5 Article: The New Rite ...

Last post by Michael Wilson - Today at 11:10:11 AM

I missed J.M's response:

No Protestant would every dare to state that the Lord's Supper is celebrated under the presidency of a sacerdos, as to them it is considered a blasphemy to assert that any one is a priest of the new covenant aside from Christ; but that aside, Cardinal Ottaviani is not an authority to quote in your favor, as we shall see.

But a Protestant would say that the priest merely "presides" over the assembly and that the Mass is merely a commemoration of the Last Supper, and not the "unbloody renewal of the bloody sacrifice of Mt. Calvary"; and that Our Lord's presence is merely a "spiritual" one, not His real physical presence.
There are real historical reasons to doubt the note signed by Cardinal Ottaviani in which he ostensibly
gives his O.K. To the N.O.M. Based on some discourse given by Paul VI; said discourse which did nothing to correct the evident deficiencies of the N.O.M. Which persist even to this day.
Which of course leads inevitably to the question of the legitimacy of the Conciliar Popes. 

#10

General Catholic Discussion / Re: Would you rather...?

Last post by Bonaventure - Today at 11:08:20 AM

Baylee,
clearly they were joking back and forth at our (sedes) expense; I was going to do the same back at them, but it came out sounding too snarky. Don't get in a huff and leave, just take it for what it is worth.

Some do not have the thick skin needed for fora life.

Oh, I've got plenty thick skin otherwise I would not have challenged you a number of times in the past few weeks.  I choose to walk away.   

I refuse to worry that my comments are too much for others to handle.  It seems that you coddle those who don't have thick skin and can't possibly deal with my strong opinions on certain matters. Despite them and contrary to your assertion, I have striven to be charitable.  You, on the other hand, do not strive to do so. Hypocrite.

Those who huff and puff "I'm leaving" usually don't tend to do so.

The issue has never been your strong opinions. It has been your posting of them all over your forum.

As @Kaesekopf remarked, there's more to life than sedevacantism. Maybe not for you, though.