Author Topic: Trump's elections fraud sting operation  (Read 1311 times)

Offline Geremia

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 3584
  • Thanked: 1044 times
    • St. Isidore e-book library
  • Religion: Roman Catholic
 
The following users thanked this post: Elizabeth.2

Offline Elizabeth.2

  • Korporal
  • **
  • Posts: 264
  • Thanked: 252 times
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2020, 07:14:02 PM »
 8)
 

Offline drummerboy

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2577
  • Thanked: 352 times
  • Religion: Don't drink the kool-aid
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2020, 11:28:47 AM »
Believe it when I see it, just like when Trump sent the marines to occupy CIA headquarters.... ::)
The bee is small among flying things, but her fruit hath the chiefest sweetness - Ecclesiasticus 3:11

"Our help is in the name of the Lord"
 
The following users thanked this post: Prayerful

Offline Philip G.

  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 917
  • Thanked: 397 times
  • Ordinary Cult
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2020, 03:45:20 PM »
David Knight of infowars seems to think otherwise.  He says in this program that Pachenik is a cia operative who he no longer allows on his show. 

https://banned.video/watch?id=5fa5a6a0b12beb1ca2cc4dd0
For the stone shall cry out of the wall; and the timber that is between the joints of the building, shall answer.  Woe to him that buildeth a town with blood, and prepareth a city by iniquity. - Habacuc 2,11-12
 
The following users thanked this post: TradGranny

Offline james03

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9576
  • Thanked: 4031 times
  • The Brutal Clarity of a Winter Morning
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2020, 08:51:05 PM »
Watched the video.  The dude is a fraud.  Basically he just cliff's what was revealed by Tony Schaffer.  He reveals himself when he tries to "spice it up".  He says they are using "block chain".  Anyone who knows the slightest about block chain knows that this is completely absurd and makes no sense.  Note I looked at Schafer's tweets and as expected, no mention of "block chain".

Schafer has cred.  Note he might be doing a psy-op or just trolling libtards, but he's been a reliable source in the past.  According to him DHS had the ballots marked at the printers with an invisible ink.  The ink shows up under either UV or IR light. 

It all boils down to chain-of-custody.  IF it is tough to get ballots, then the Dems had to forge their own.  Those ballots will be missing the authentication stamp.  In that case, they are nailed.

On the other hand, the Dems could have just stolen blank ballots and filled them out.  In that case the fraudulent ballots would have the stamp, so you didn't accomplish anything.  As I said, it gets down to the Dems ability to steal say 200,000 blank ballots.  That's a huge theft and might have been impossible, so this sting might be true.  We'll find out.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"
 
The following users thanked this post: Lynne, Michael Wilson, TradGranny, Christe Eleison, paul14

Offline TradGranny

  • Mary Garden
  • Wachtmeister
  • ***
  • Posts: 1136
  • Thanked: 824 times
  • Religion: Traditional Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2020, 04:00:05 PM »
Nothing on CI re Tony Schaffer. Who is he?
To have courage for whatever comes in life - everything lies in that.
Saint Teresa of Avila
 

Offline drummerboy

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 2577
  • Thanked: 352 times
  • Religion: Don't drink the kool-aid
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2020, 04:20:22 PM »
Watched the video.  The dude is a fraud.  Basically he just cliff's what was revealed by Tony Schaffer.  He reveals himself when he tries to "spice it up".  He says they are using "block chain".  Anyone who knows the slightest about block chain knows that this is completely absurd and makes no sense.  Note I looked at Schafer's tweets and as expected, no mention of "block chain".

Schafer has cred.  Note he might be doing a psy-op or just trolling libtards, but he's been a reliable source in the past.  According to him DHS had the ballots marked at the printers with an invisible ink.  The ink shows up under either UV or IR light. 

It all boils down to chain-of-custody.  IF it is tough to get ballots, then the Dems had to forge their own.  Those ballots will be missing the authentication stamp.  In that case, they are nailed.

On the other hand, the Dems could have just stolen blank ballots and filled them out.  In that case the fraudulent ballots would have the stamp, so you didn't accomplish anything.  As I said, it gets down to the Dems ability to steal say 200,000 blank ballots.  That's a huge theft and might have been impossible, so this sting might be true.  We'll find out.

And he's wearing the stereotypical Hawaiian shirt it seems every CIA guy needs to wear, made me laugh.
The bee is small among flying things, but her fruit hath the chiefest sweetness - Ecclesiasticus 3:11

"Our help is in the name of the Lord"
 

Offline james03

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9576
  • Thanked: 4031 times
  • The Brutal Clarity of a Winter Morning
  • Religion: Catholic
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"
 

Offline Lynne

  • Thankful to be Catholic!
  • Mary Garden
  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9961
  • Thanked: 4868 times
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2020, 06:00:21 PM »
https://twitter.com/tom2badcat/status/1325124397729001472

Quote
On Election night, Trump and his campaign team assembled in the Eisenhower Building just west if the White House to watch the results come in.

Know what is there?

A SCIF.


Quote
Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. (SCIF)
The kind used by Army intelligence cyber security division.
They were monitoring the fraud in real time.

Quote
They knew which states were using the voting machines loaded with HAMMER & SCORECARD.
(Software developed for the CIA to manipulate voter tallies remotely in foreign elections.)
It was just deployed against the American people.
Tom Fitton & Sydney Powell put it right in your face


Video and other info at the link.
In conclusion, I can leave you with no better advice than that given after every sermon by Msgr Vincent Giammarino, who was pastor of St Michael’s Church in Atlantic City in the 1950s:

    “My dear good people: Do what you have to do, When you’re supposed to do it, The best way you can do it,   For the Love of God. Amen.”
 
The following users thanked this post: Miriam_M, Christe Eleison

Offline Graham

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 1699
  • Thanked: 1480 times
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2020, 06:18:41 PM »
This sounds like Q stuff so like Drummerboy I'll believe it when I see it.
 
The following users thanked this post: james03

Offline james03

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9576
  • Thanked: 4031 times
  • The Brutal Clarity of a Winter Morning
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #10 on: November 08, 2020, 06:36:22 PM »
I agree with the sentiment.  "Trust the Plan".  "Trust Sessions".  "Trust Wray".  "Podesta has been arrested".  "Clinesmith -- BOOM".

That being said, EVERYONE knew what the "mail in" COVID ballots were all about, and Trump has more intel and more resources by an order of magnitude.  So he had to prepare.  2 Options:

1.  He did prepare, however he was not expecting this level of open corruption, which means his defense was overwhelmed.  Basically you don't prepare for this level of corruption because you are implicitly depending on the press, even a Fox News.  In which case Kamala will be President.

2.  He has it covered.  Him going golfing looks like a signal that his defense is activated and now he just has to be patient.

Right now, the only ones who know are Trump and his team.  We are just speculating.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"
 
The following users thanked this post: Lynne, Michael Wilson

Offline james03

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9576
  • Thanked: 4031 times
  • The Brutal Clarity of a Winter Morning
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #11 on: November 08, 2020, 06:41:40 PM »
Zero hedge picks for AG:  Sally Yates or Phreet Bahara.  Both crooked STASI types.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"
 

Offline Geremia

  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 3584
  • Thanked: 1044 times
    • St. Isidore e-book library
  • Religion: Roman Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #12 on: November 08, 2020, 06:55:42 PM »
The dude is a fraud.

Dr. Steve Pieczenik has an interesting background.


We are just speculating.
Here are some facts:

The U.S. Post Office's August 2020 U.S. patent 0258338 ("Secure voting system"):
Quote
BACKGROUND
Field
This development relates to a voting system that also incorporates the use of cryptographic elements, such as blockchains, as are used with cryptographic currencies, to track and secure the vote by mail system.
Description of the Related Art
Voters generally wish to be able to vote for elected officials or on other issues in a manner that is convenient and secure. Further, those holding elections wish to be able to ensure that election results have not been tampered with and that the results actually correspond to the votes that were cast. In some embodiments, a blockchain allows the tracking of the various types of necessary data in a way that is secure and allows others to easily confirm that data has not been altered.

CISA's 7/31/2020 infographic:
Quote
Most ballots have proprietary style codes, such as timing marks, code channels, or QR codes. If the codes are not recognized by the voting machines, the ballot is rejected, and an election official manually reviews it.
The infographic mentions that some ballots have watermarks, too.

A hash of voter information with, say, a mailing date could be put in a blockchain, enabling proof of existence and time-stamping of the ballot; priority disputes between a valid ballot and later, fraudulant ones can be resolved by looking up the ballots' respective hashes in the blockchain and seeing which one came first.

Dr. Steve Pieczenik said:
Quote
This is really a sting operation, contrary to what everyone else said. We watermarked every ballot with QFS blockchain encryption code. In other words, we know pretty well where every ballot is, where it went and who has it, so this is not a stolen election.

Also, that DHS has oversight in U.S. elections, per Trump's 12 Sept. 2018 executive order on foreign interference in elections.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2020, 07:35:37 PM by Geremia »
 

Offline james03

  • Hauptmann
  • ****
  • Posts: 9576
  • Thanked: 4031 times
  • The Brutal Clarity of a Winter Morning
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #13 on: November 09, 2020, 12:10:29 AM »
But the ballots are blank.  Granny in the nursing home isn't scanning a QR code and entering it into a block chain.  The Dems just steal the ballots, fill them out, then scan the QR codes when they return them.  You accomplish nothing. 

If you want to stop forged ballots, invisible ink is the way to go.  A QR code would tip off the forgers that the ballots are individualized.

I don't buy the block chain "sting".  I can see a future where block chain is used by the voting kiosk to register a vote.  But it makes no sense in a sting operation.
"But he that doth not believe, is already judged: because he believeth not in the name of the only begotten Son of God (Jn 3:18)."

"All sorrow leads to the foot of the Cross.  Weep for your sins."

"Although He should kill me, I will trust in Him"
 

Offline martin88nyc

  • St. Joseph's Workbench
  • Feldwebel
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Thanked: 2304 times
  • Religion: Catholic
Re: Trump's elections fraud sting operation
« Reply #14 on: November 09, 2020, 12:25:13 AM »
Wait Just a Minute! Some Very Good News May Be Coming
By Jay Valentine
Like many, I spent the last few nights waking up at 2:03 A.M., no reason, then looking at my phone for news, any news, that might be positive for President Trump.  I survived on Rush, Bongino, Mark Levin.  When the news continued to be ugly, I even checked in on ridiculous bloggers promising that ballots were watermarked and D.J. (our household name for a president we love) was actually launching a sting on the Deep State.

Enough already.  Stop the madness. 

Hey, I have a degree in statistics, and I have some level of critical thought.  If there is such pessimism in my tribe, I am not going along.

So today, I started to dig into the numbers, and as I did, I fought my confirmation bias at every step.  I realized that I, like millions of others, had been numbed into despondency by the overwhelming press, media, social media push to certify President-Elect Biden.  (I put that in there so you can see how repellent it is.)

Hey guys, this thing is not only not over; it is scary for Biden.  I mean really scary, and most of all, the media know it.  Thus, the rush to get everyone in line with the narrative that a 78-year-old, early-dementia former V.P., who could not draw a crowd larger than a dozen, just beat D.J. in a fair election.

Process that for a moment.

Start with Pennsylvania.  Biden, as of this writing, is at 290 electoral votes.  Pennsylvania is 20.

I read the Justice Alito opinion, and it is pretty clear that he wants the after election night at 8:00 P.M. votes separated for a reason.  Biden is going to lose at the Supreme Court, and they know it.  Four justices already said the Pennsylvania Supreme Court cannot adjust voting rules.   A new arrival, Justice Barrett, says she is there to apply the rules in the Constitution.  OK, wanna bet she does?

Remove the after 8:00 P.M. ballots, and Biden loses Pennsylvania.  Biden 270.

Let's visit Nevada.  I have lots of friends in California who have condos in Nevada to evade state taxes.  There are not a couple of people doing this; there are tens of thousands.  Everyone knows it, and California seeks them out.

Our old pal Harry Reid knows it as well, and he apparently has them voting in droves in this election.  Probably not a big D.J. constituency.  Within 72 hours of the election, the Trump team found, validated over 3,500 of them.  I do not suspect that Trump's people stopped counting.

Every one of these is a ballot reduction for Biden

Nevada, as of now, is well within reach for DJ and the Trump team — particularly when the California crowd is reduced.  And a few of them may testify since a false vote is a very bad thing, with jail time if convicted.  Maybe a bigger story here.

Remember where we are, people.  Biden is at 270 after a highly probable Supreme Court decision (read Alito and concurring opinions).

Lose Nevada, lose the election.

But wait: it gets better.

Let's visit Wisconsin.  Right now, it is 20,000 votes in Uncle Joe's direction.  Lots of stories out there, well below the Google fold, that there are way more Wisconsin votes than there are registered voters.  OK, maybe the dead can vote up there — probably a Midwest thing.

Well, last night, we found that Wisconsin election clerks were told, and followed the direction, to modify mail-in ballots and fill in the blanks where witnesses left out critical info.

I am sure it was just a good customer service thing and they meant no harm.  The problem is every such ballot is now toast.

There were "thousands" of such prima facie wrongful votes.  Oops.  Biden up 20,000 — now that number is in question.  No more truckloads of votes coming in, so every ballot D.J.'s team eliminates gets President-Elect Biden one step closer to former V.P. Biden who lives in a basement.  Not good here.

North Carolina.  That one pretty much looks like as though it is over and D.J. won it.  Fox News is rumored to call it for Trump around April 2021.

Remember where we are here.  Biden is probably going to lose Pennsylvania, so if he loses even one state, even one Electoral College vote, ouch!

Either D.J. wins outright, or it goes to the House, which means that D.J. has four more years.

We're not done yet.

Michigan.  Oh, yes, the land of the "glitches" in the voting machines.  Six thousand votes for Trump given to Biden in one of 47 counties where that software is used.  About 150,000 votes in Biden's favor right now. 

Google the 130,000 Biden votes that showed up in the middle of the night, and you can see how the wonderful people at Google are fact-checking this "debunked" story.  In fact, for fun, Google "Michigan voter fraud," and you get literally three pages of "this was fact checked and proven to be false."  Why would Google be so assiduous?

They too see that if Amy votes with the four, Biden is one vote away from the basement.

Lawsuits in Michigan and the other states are being launched, and discovery will take place.  Google will not be there. 

Voter fraud is kind of like larceny.  A little is OK.  It is even kind of entertaining.

Dead people have been voting for a hundred years in Democratic cities.  It is such a constant that one would think the Republican Party would consider a Dead Voter Outreach program to get their share.

But voter fraud on this scale is just not sustainable.  It does not pass the common sense test.

We have bloggers with lots of time on their hands going through voter rolls and showing that person after person who voted in a swing state also fought in the Civil War or maybe the War of 1812.  It was funny at first, but the overwhelming number now goes beyond humor and rubs our faces in it.

I think D.J. has to swing one state.  Actually, one electoral vote.  Not only is this thing not over, but the Biden team must be sweating bullets.

Voter fraud at scale seemed like a really cool idea until D.J. went to the mattresses.  Now that he is fighting it out one voter at a time, with the Supreme Court likely to create the starting point at Biden 270, Biden has everything to lose.

Perk up!
"These things I have spoken to you, that in me you may have peace. In the world you shall have distress: but have confidence, I have overcome the world." John 16:33
 
The following users thanked this post: mikemac, Lynne, Miriam_M