That excerpt from After the Ball was enlightening and disturbing.
So, if I understand dellery's point, Voris used jamming to manipulate our response to his revelations about his homosexual past. Have I got that right, dellery?
Rather than just come clean on his own or allow the leaks to happen and address them as needed, he used gay agenda tactics, which demonstrates that even if he left the lifestyle behind, he has no qualms about using their tactics, and therefore what he says about anything should be regarded with more suspicion.
This is the first I have ever heard about these tactics, but frankly, once I read it, it made sense. In fact, a lot of swift cultural changes of the past century made more sense. For example, going from the almost unanimous opposition to contraception in Christendom to its almost unanimous acceptance and even expectation of its use by all Christian couples within the space of a few decades is another example where these manipulation tactics were likely at play.
Dellery, I thank you for taking the time to share that excerpt with the forum. I have been following this thread silently up until now because I used to be a monthly subscriber to CMTV, until they started on the witch hunt tactics against Michael Matt and Christopher Ferrara and Loie Verrechio and then the SSPX in general. I had always been a bit disturbed by Voris's mannerisms in his Vortex videos and Mic'D up videos, but did enjoy the Baltimore Catechism series which I watched many times through. Now that he has revealed his homosexual lifestyle in his past (which I do believe he left behind) a lot of what I found disconcerting makes more sense. In fact, I always suspected he might have been a closet SSA man, but never did I suspect 15 years of living the gay life.
Anyway, I have begun to ramble a bit in my post. But I just really wanted to jump in to ask if I understand dellery' point correctly. Thanks again.