Indecent scripts / writing systems

Started by Daniel, November 15, 2020, 02:48:21 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Daniel

Might be a stupid question, but...

As Catholics, is it ok to read and write using scripts that contain "indecent" characters?

Some of the ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs are indecent (and at least one or two are explicitly pornographic). (For example, some of the hieroglyphs in Gardiner's D class depict breasts and male genitalia. And supposedly there's an older glyph, not seen very often, which graphically depicts sexual intercourse.)

Also, some Chinese characters are indecent. (For example, the character for "woman"--and especially the character for "mother"--depict shirtless women with breasts. Though with Chinese, the characters are more abstract looking, so it's not as noticeable.) But I believe Catholic missionaries have historically used the Chinese writing system when dealing with the Chinese? And Chinese Catholics to this day use Chinese characters in their everyday lives?

(For me, Egyptian hieroglyphs is a hobby. And I can focus my attention only the other glyphs, but an indecent glyph might always show up in an Egyptian text as well as in the dictionary. You never know.)

Chestertonian

"I am not much of a Crusader, that is for sure, but at least I am not a Mohamedist!"

Daniel

#2
Yes.

However, it's actually a stylized pictogram of a kneeling woman with breasts. (Or, at least that's what scholars believe: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/?#Glyph_origin ) But since you can hardly make it out, I guess maybe it's ok?

The Egyptian hieroglyphics, on the other hand, are far more detailed. Like you can see everything clearly without even trying. (Not even going to post a link since it's kind of vulgar and I don't think we're supposed to be looking at it. Several hieroglyphs depict "parts of the body" such as the mouth and arm and eye and feet and stuff, and that's all fine... except that a few of these body parts happen to be breasts/private parts.)

Chestertonian

"I am not much of a Crusader, that is for sure, but at least I am not a Mohamedist!"

TheReturnofLive

"The task of the modern educator is not to cut down jungles but irrigate deserts." - C.S. Lewis

abc123

There is nothing vulgar about the human body.

Aside from that I think you need help. Have you discussed your extreme scruples with a priest?

MundaCorMeum


Kaesekopf

Quote from: abc123 on November 16, 2020, 08:55:18 PM
There is nothing vulgar about the human body.

Aside from that I think you need help. Have you discussed your extreme scruples with a priest?

This times a million.
Wie dein Sonntag, so dein Sterbetag.

I am not altogether on anybody's side, because nobody is altogether on my side.  ~Treebeard, LOTR

Jesus son of David, have mercy on me.

GiftOfGod

OP, you need to get married to quiet your concupiscence. Are you also concerned about how some trees look?
Quote from: Maximilian on December 30, 2021, 11:15:48 AM
Quote from: Goldfinch on December 30, 2021, 10:36:10 AM
Quote from: Innocent Smith on December 30, 2021, 10:25:55 AM
If attending Mass, the ordinary form as celebrated everyday around the world be sinful, then the Church no longer exists. Period.
Rather, if the NOM were the lex credendi of the Church, then the Church would no longer exist. However, the true mass and the true sacraments still exist and will hold the candle of faith until Our Lord steps in to restore His Bride to her glory.
We could compare ourselves to the Catholics in England at the time of the Reformation. Was it sinful for them to attend Cranmer's service?
We have to remind ourselves that all the machinery of the "Church" continued in place. They had priests, bishops, churches, cathedrals. But all of them were using the new "Book of Common Prayer" instead of the Catholic Mass. Ordinary lay people could see with their own eyes an enormous entity that called itself the "Church," but did the true Church still exist in that situation? Meanwhile, in small hiding places in certain homes were a handful of true priests offering the true Mass at the risk of imprisonment, torture and death.